| Challenge: | Existing systems that can handle a user's utterance are unable to handle Q&A or SLU. |
| Approach: | They build a transfer learning framework for executable semantic parsing . they show it is effective for Q&A and for spoken language understanding . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is effective for Q&A and Spoken Language Understanding . it can be learned by exploiting data on other domains, the authors show . |
Similar Papers
Neural Semantic Parsing (P18-5)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing is the study of translating natural language utterances into machine-executable programs. |
| Approach: | They will describe the various approaches researchers have taken to translate natural language into a formal language . they will also discuss why much recent work has chosen to use standard programming languages instead of more linguistically-motivated representations. |
| Outcome: | This paper will describe the various approaches researchers have taken to translate natural language into a formal language. |
Learning from Executions for Semantic Parsing (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing aims at translating natural language (NL) utterances onto machine-interpretable programs. |
| Approach: | They propose to encourage a parser to generate executable programs for unlabeled NL utterances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed training objectives outperform conventional methods on Overnight and GeoQuery. |
Grounding language acquisition by training semantic parsers using captioned videos (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new method for parsing sentences using captioned videos is being developed . we use video clips to ground the semantics of language, but without annotations . |
| Approach: | They develop a semantic parser that is trained in a grounded setting using captioned videos . they use a corpus of sentences paired with videos without other annotations to train it . |
| Outcome: | The proposed parser recovers the meaning of English sentences despite no annotations . learning a grounded semantic parsers can expand the range of data that parseurs can be trained on . |
The Interpreter Understands Your Meaning: End-to-end Spoken Language Understanding Aided by Speech Translation (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern artificial intelligence is characterized by large pretrained language models with strong language capabilities to be adapted to various downstream tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the task of speech translation (ST) to pretrain speech models for end-to-end SLU on intra- and cross-lingual scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves higher performance over baselines on monolingual and multilingual intent classification as well as spoken question answering using SLURP, MINDS-14, and NMSQA benchmarks. |
Semantic Parsing for English as a Second Language (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on domain adaptation in NLP focus on learning challenges at the syntax-semantics interface during second language acquisition. |
| Approach: | They propose to use English Resource Grammar and TLE to parse ESL data using a reranking model to evaluate the quality of the annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can obtain a very promising quality in comparison to human annotations. |
Context Dependent Semantic Parsing: A Survey (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing is the task of translating natural language utterances into machine-readable meaning representations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextual information to translate natural language utterances into machine-readable meaning representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods do not utilize contextual information, which could boost the semantic parsing systems. |
Is Supervised Syntactic Parsing Beneficial for Language Understanding Tasks? An Empirical Investigation (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Traditional NLP has long held (supervised) syntactic parsing necessary for successful higher-level semantic language understanding (LU). |
| Approach: | They empirically examine the usefulness of supervised parsing for semantic LU in LM-pretrained transformer networks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on LM-pretrained transformer networks with a biaffine parsing head and fine-tuned for LU tasks. |
Active Learning for Multilingual Semantic Parser (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual semantic parsing datasets are limited in translation effort due to data imbalance. |
| Approach: | They propose a first active learning procedure for multilingual semantic parsing (AL-MSP) it selects only a subset from existing datasets to be translated, they propose . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly reduces translation costs with ideal selection methods. |
Semantic Parsing with Dual Learning (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to parse natural language queries are limited by lack of labeled data and constrained decoding. |
| Approach: | They propose a semantic parsing framework with the dual learning algorithm that makes full use of data through a dual-learning game. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on ATIS dataset and gets competitive performance on overnight dataset. |
Learning Cross-lingual Distributed Logical Representations for Semantic Parsing (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research efforts have looked into the problem of learning semantic parsers in a multilingual setup, but how to improve the performance of a monolingual semantic parsed system remains a research question that is under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose to use data annotated in different languages to learn distributed representations of logical forms for improving a monolingual semantic parser. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on the standard multilingual GeoQuery dataset. |