Distant Supervision Relation Extraction with Intra-Bag and Inter-Bag Attentions (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to extract relational data generated by distant supervision generate noisy training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural relation extraction method to deal with noisy training data generated by distant supervision. |
| Outcome: | Experimental results show that the proposed method is more accurate than state-of-the-art methods on the New York Times dataset. |
Similar Papers
A Dataset for Inter-Sentence Relation Extraction using Distant Supervision (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for intra-sentence relation extraction use a distance supervision method to extract relations between entities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark dataset for the task of inter-sentence relation extraction using relations previously used for intra-sentent relation extraction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is compared with baseline models and recurrent neural network models on the developed dataset. |
SENT: Sentence-level Distant Relation Extraction via Negative Training (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction use bag labels, which introduce noise, to train the model. |
| Approach: | They propose to use negative training to train a model using complementary labels to separate the noisy data from the training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on previous methods on sentence-level evaluation and de-noise effect. |
Combining Distant and Direct Supervision for Neural Relation Extraction (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to train relation extraction with distant supervision use noisy labels and implicitly assumes that all the KB facts are mentioned in the text. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine distant supervision data with additional directly-supervised data to train relation extraction models by using sigmoidal attention weights with max pooling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art on the widely used FB-NYT dataset. |
Denoising Relation Extraction from Document-level Distant Supervision (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate auto-labeled sentences for relation extraction (RE) are difficult to extend to document-level relation extraction as noise from DS may be even multiplied in documents. |
| Approach: | They propose a pre-trained model which de-emphasizes noisy DS data via multiple pre-training tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can capture useful information from noisy data and achieve promising results on the large-scale DocRE benchmark. |
Relation Extraction with Explanation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies focus on improving relation extraction accuracy but little is known about their explanability. |
| Approach: | They propose to automatically generate "distractor" sentences to augment the bags and train the model to ignore the distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves extraction accuracy while also explanability. |
Neural Relation Extraction via Inner-Sentence Noise Reduction and Transfer Learning (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for extracting relations are slow and lack precision . a novel approach to extract relations is proposed to reduce noise between sentences . |
| Approach: | They propose a word-level distant supervised approach for relation extraction using New York Times and Freebase. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the area of precision/call(PR) from 0.35 to 0.39 over the state-of-the-art methods. |
Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction using Multi-Layer Revision Network and Confidence-based Multi-Instance Learning (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distantly supervised relation extraction is used in knowledge bases but its low quality and noisy sentences are present in sentence bags. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-layer revision network which emphasizes inner-sentence correlations before extracting relevant information within sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on two New York Times datasets. |
Hierarchical Relation Extraction with Coarse-to-Fine Grained Attention (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction use knowledge graphs to automatically label training data . but, it suffers from the wrong labeling problem because not all sentences containing two entities can express their relations in KGs . |
| Approach: | They propose a distant supervision approach to automatically label training instances . they integrate hierarchical information of relations into distantly supervised relation extraction . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on a large-scale dataset. |
Improving Long-Tail Relation Extraction with Collaborating Relation-Augmented Attention (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to handle wrong labeling and long-tail relations are labor-intensive and scarce training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural network to handle wrong labeling and long-tail relations by collaborating relation-augmented attention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed neural network improves the state-of-the-art on the NYT dataset . |
A Simple Model for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent methods focus on exploiting bag representations with complex de-noising scheme to achieve remarkable performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a BERT-based Graph convolutional network model that exploits bag representations . their model extracts key information from each instance and constructs a bag graph . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on two benchmark datasets, i.e., NYT10 and GDS. |