DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a large body of work has highlighted the brittleness of reading comprehension systems . a crowdsourced, adversarially-created, 55k-question benchmark requires a more comprehensive understanding of paragraphs . |
| Approach: | They propose a reading comprehension benchmark that requires Discrete Reasoning over the content of paragraphs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the best systems only achieve 38.4% F1 on the generalized accuracy metric, while human performance is 96%. |
Similar Papers
Numerical reasoning in machine reading comprehension tasks: are we there yet? (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Numerical reasoning based machine reading comprehension models have achieved near-human performance on a variety of benchmarks, but are they capable of learning to reason? |
| Approach: | They propose to use a DROP benchmark to measure machine reading comprehension and investigate models that have achieved near-human performance over standard metrics. |
| Outcome: | The DROP benchmark has inspired the design of specialized BERT and embedding the results into a specialized model. |
How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarks (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research addresses reading comprehension, where examples consist of (question, passage, answer) tuples. |
| Approach: | They establish sensible baselines for bAbI, SQuAD, CBT, CNN and Who-did-What datasets and compare them to their previous work. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform on 14 out of 20 bAbI, SQuAD, CBT, CNN and Who-did-What datasets. |
Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | End-to-end reading comprehension models have been successful at extracting text answers, but there are still problems with generalizing them to abstractive numerical reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment a BERT-based reading comprehension model with a set of executable ‘programs’ which encompass simple arithmetic as well as extraction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform 33% absolute improvement on the DROP dataset, with very few training examples. |
Quoref: A Reading Comprehension Dataset with Questions Requiring Coreferential Reasoning (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reading comprehension benchmarks do not contain complex coreferential phenomena . obtaining questions focused on such phenomena is difficult because of lexical cues . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a crowdsourced dataset to examine the ability of models to resolve coreference among entities in Wikipedia paragraphs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs significantly worse than humans on the reading comprehension benchmark . paragraphs and other longer texts typically make multiple references to the same entities . |
NumNet: Machine Reading Comprehension with Numerical Reasoning (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing numerical MRC models are weak in numerical reasoning, such as addition, subtraction, sorting and counting. |
| Approach: | They propose a numerical MRC model that integrates numerical reasoning into existing MRC models and achieves an EM-score of 64.56% on the DROP dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all existing machine reading comprehension models by considering the numerical relations among numbers on the DROP dataset. |
Looking Beyond the Surface: A Challenge Set for Reading Comprehension over Multiple Sentences (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a dataset of 6,500+ questions, we found that human solvers achieved an F1-score of 88.1%. |
| Approach: | They propose a reading comprehension challenge in which questions can only be answered by taking into account information from multiple sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed reading comprehension challenge is based on a reading comprehension dataset with 6,500+ questions and 1000+ paragraphs across 7 domains. |
On Making Reading Comprehension More Comprehensive (D19-58)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Getting machines to "understand" text is a vast and long-standing problem, made more challenging by the fact that it is not even clear what it means to understand text. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-based approach to machine reading comprehension that uses a natural language question to test a system's comprehension of a passage of text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed questions have surface cues or other biases that allow a model to shortcut the intended reasoning process. |
Benchmarking Machine Reading Comprehension: A Psychological Perspective (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MRC is a task that tests the ability of a machine to read and understand unstructured text. |
| Approach: | They propose a theoretical basis for the design of MRC datasets based on psychology and psychometrics and propose shortcut-proof questions and explanations as a part of the task design. |
| Outcome: | The proposed datasets should evaluate the model's ability to understand context-dependent situations and ensure substantive validity by shortcut-proof questions and explanation as a part of the task design. |
LILA: A Unified Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Swaroop Mishra, Matthew Finlayson, Pan Lu, Leonard Tang, Sean Welleck, Chitta Baral, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Oyvind Tafjord, Ashish Sabharwal, Peter Clark, Ashwin Kalyan
| Challenge: | Towards evaluating and improving AI systems in this domain, we propose a mathematical reasoning benchmark based on 23 diversetasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a mathematical reasoning benchmark that includes 23 diverse tasks . they extend the benchmark by collecting task instructions and solutions in the form of Python programs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on multi-tasking while the best performing model only achieves 60.40%. |
Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task (ARCT) focuses on inferences, not just discovering warrants. |
| Approach: | They propose to build an adversarial dataset on which all models achieve random accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset provides a more robust assessment of argument comprehension and should be adopted as the standard in future work. |