Challenge: Multiple annotation conventions have been proposed for representing dependency structures.
Approach: They propose to consider a set of syntactic references encoding alternative syntak representations to train a parser with a dynamic oracle.
Outcome: The proposed approach can predict the best syntactic representation among all possible references.

Similar Papers

A Dynamic Oracle for Linear-Time 2-Planar Dependency Parsing (N18-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing dynamic oracles for greedy parsers can handle non-projective syntax, but none are available for these types of training.
Approach: They propose an efficient dynamic oracle for training the 2-Planar transition-based parser with over 99% coverage on non-projective syntactic corpora.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the static training strategy in the vast majority of languages tested and scored better on most datasets than the arc-hybrid parser enhanced with the Swap transition.
Enhancing Structure-aware Encoder with Extremely Limited Data for Graph-based Dependency Parsing (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Dependency parsing is an important natural language processing task which analyzes the syntactic structure of an input sentence.
Approach: They propose a structure-aware encoder pre-trained on auto-parsed data to improve dependency parsing . they propose combining gold dependency trees with existing parsers to improve parser performance .
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms baselines under different parsers and dependency standards under different parameters and model architectures.
Dynamic Oracles for Top-Down and In-Order Shift-Reduce Constituent Parsing (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Top-down and in-order shift-reduce constituent parsers are the most accurate known shift-reducing algorithms for constituent paring.
Approach: They propose to use dynamic oracles to train two of the most accurate shift-reduce algorithms for constituent parsing.
Outcome: The proposed top-down and in-order shift-reduce parsers improve on the WSJ benchmark.
Viable Dependency Parsing as Sequence Labeling (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on dependency parsing by sequence labeling suggested that it was impractical.
Approach: They propose to use dependency trees as sequence labels to obtain fast and accurate parsers using a conventional BILSTM-based model.
Outcome: The proposed models are conceptually simple, not needing traditional parsing algorithms or auxiliary structures, and provide a good speed-accuracy tradeoff, with results competitive with more complex approaches.
A Root of a Problem: Optimizing Single-Root Dependency Parsing (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Graph-based dependency parsers can be improved without compromising on accuracy or accuracy.
Approach: They propose two approaches to single-root dependency parsing that yield speed ups . they show that one approach is fully correct and finds the optimal dependency tree .
Outcome: The proposed approach finds the optimal dependency tree without loss of accuracy or optimality.
Simpler but More Accurate Semantic Dependency Parsing (P18-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Syntactic dependency parsing is the most popular method for automatically extracting low-level relationships between words in a sentence.
Approach: They extend a syntactic dependency parser to train on and generate graph-structured representations that capture between-word relationships that are more closely related to the meaning of a sentence.
Outcome: The proposed system beats the current state-of-the-art system by 0.6% and linguistically richer representations push the margin even higher.
Automatic Correction of Syntactic Dependency Annotation Differences (2022.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Annotation inconsistencies between data sets can cause problems for low-resource NLP . a simple method for automatically detecting annotation mismatches between corpora is proposed .
Approach: They propose a method for automatically detecting annotation mismatches between dependency parsing corpora . they also propose three related methods for automatically configuring the mismatch .
Outcome: The proposed method improves performance on both converted and unconverted data.
Dynamic Head Selection for Neural Lexicalized Constituency Parsing (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Lexicalized parsing has traditionally been neglected in favor of unlexicalized, span-based methods.
Approach: They propose a latent lexicalization framework that dynamically infers lexicals from data without relying on predefined head-finding rules.
Outcome: The proposed model learns lexical dependencies directly from data, offering greater adaptability across languages and datasets.
Parsing as Tagging (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for dependency parsing treat parse as tagging, but they are not perfect.
Approach: They propose a simple yet accurate method that treats parsing as tagging . they use a sequence model with a bidirectional LSTM over BERT embeddings .
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art method on universal dependency (UD) by 1.76% unlabeled attachment score (UAS) for English, 1.98% UAS for French, and 1.16% UAS in German.
Neural Reranking for Dependency Parsing: An Evaluation (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work shows that neural rerankers can improve dependency parsing results over the top k trees produced by a base parser.
Approach: They propose to use a discriminative reranker to improve dependency parsing results . they propose to incorporate global information into the model to improve parse accuracies .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing models on English and German and Czech, and is the only one to improve on German and Chinese data.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations