Author Commitment and Social Power: Automatic Belief Tagging to Infer the Social Context of Interactions (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Social power is a difficult concept to define, but is often manifested in how we interact with one another. |
| Approach: | They employ extra-propositional semantics extraction within NLP to study author commitment . they find that subordinates use significantly more instances of non-commitment than superiors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that subordinates use significantly more instances of non-commitment than superiors, and that enriching lexical features with commitment labels captures important distinctions in social meanings. |
Similar Papers
Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | 146 papers analyzing "bias" in NLP systems lack normative reasoning, we find . authors propose three recommendations for work analyzing “bias” in Nlp systems . |
| Approach: | They propose three recommendations for analyzing "bias" in NLP systems . they propose to focus on what kinds of system behaviors are harmful, in what ways, to whom, and why . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods for measuring or mitigating “bias” are poorly matched to their motivations and do not engage critically with literature outside of NLP. |
ContractNLI: A Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inference for Contracts (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Contract review is a time-consuming procedure that costs companies millions of dollars each year . linguistic characteristics of contracts, such as negations by exceptions, contribute to the difficulty of this task . |
| Approach: | They propose a document-level natural language inference (NLI) task for contracts . they annotate and release the largest corpus to date consisting of 607 annotated contracts a linguistically rich system is proposed . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is based on a contract review task that includes 607 annotated contracts. |
Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Language (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language has enormous power to project social biases and reinforce stereotypes on people. |
| Approach: | They propose a new conceptual formalism that aims to model the pragmatic frames in which people project social biases and power differentials onto others. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can model the pragmatic frames in which people project social biases and power differentials onto others. |
Guilt by Association: Emotion Intensities in Lexical Representations (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | linguistic models have a higher correlation with human ground truth ratings than labeled data . word vectors have often been evaluated on standard word relatedness benchmarks . |
| Approach: | They propose to use unsupervised, supervised, and finally supervised methods to extract emotional associations from pretrained vectors and models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows higher correlation with ground truth ratings than state-of-the-art lexicons based on labeled data. |
Towards Author-informed NLP: Mind the Social Bias (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models of text understanding fail when opinions are conveyed implicitly or sarcastically. |
| Approach: | They propose to model user contexts within a social embedding space that was learned from the Twitter network at large-scale. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves generalization of stance prediction and toxicity detection, and also toxicity and incivility detection. |
Do You Know That Florence Is Packed with Visitors? Evaluating State-of-the-art Models of Speaker Commitment (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for speaker commitment fail to generalize to diverse linguistic constructions, highlighting directions for improvement. |
| Approach: | They evaluate two state-of-the-art speaker commitment models on the CommitmentBank . they analyze linguistic correlates of model error on a naturalistic dataset . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform well on some classes but fail to generalize to diverse linguistic constructions. |
Do Language Models Exhibit Human-like Structural Priming Effects? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent exposure to a structure facilitates processing of the same structure, a study finds . structural priming is well attested in humans, for both language production and comprehension . |
| Approach: | They use the structural priming paradigm to investigate where priming effects manifest . they find that rarer elements within a prime increase priming effect . |
| Outcome: | The findings provide an important piece in the puzzle of understanding how properties within their context affect structural prediction in language models. |
From Text to Context: Contextualizing Language with Humans, Groups, and Communities for Socially Aware NLP (2024.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Adithya V Ganesan, Siddharth Mangalik, Vasudha Varadarajan, Nikita Soni, Swanie Juhng, João Sedoc, H. Andrew Schwartz, Salvatore Giorgi, Ryan L Boyd
| Challenge: | This tutorial will cover the latest techniques and libraries for doing so at each level of analysis. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will cover the latest techniques and libraries for doing so at each level of analysis. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial covers human-centered techniques that provide benefit to traditional document- or word-level NLP tasks. |
On learning and representing social meaning in NLP: a sociolinguistic perspective (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | linguistic variation allows for the expression of social meaning, information about the social background and identity of the language user. |
| Approach: | They introduce the concept of social meaning to NLP and discuss how sociolinguistics can inform work on representation learning in NLP. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to learn social meaning in NLP and identify key challenges. |
Not that much power: Linguistic alignment is influenced more by low-level linguistic features rather than social power (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | linguistic alignment between interlocutors of higher power is attributed to their relative social power, but studies on low-level linguistic features do not account for these factors. |
| Approach: | They characterize the effect of power on alignment with logistic regression models in two datasets and find it vanishes after controlling for low-level features such as utterance length. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that the effect vanishes or is reversed after controlling for low-level features such as utterance length. |