‘Aye’ or ‘No’? Speech-level Sentiment Analysis of Hansard UK Parliamentary Debate Transcripts (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Transcripts of UK parliamentary debates are difficult for human readers to process due to the large quantity of textual data and the specialised language used. |
| Approach: | They propose to use annotated sentiment labels and labels derived from speakers' votes to classify the sentiment polarity of speakers as being either positive or negative towards motions proposed in the debates. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on a dataset of parliamentary debate transcripts using textual and contextual features. |
Similar Papers
ParlVote: A Corpus for Sentiment Analysis of Political Debates (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Debate transcripts from the UK Parliament contain information about the positions taken by politicians towards important topics, but are difficult for humans to process manually. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a linear classifier and a transformer word embedding model to classify sentiment polarity in debate speeches to evaluate sentiment analysis systems for the political domain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs better on the largest dataset and is more robust to other datasets. |
Investigating Political Herd Mentality: A Community Sentiment Based Approach (P19-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | polarities inherent in political speeches and debates pose an important problem today. |
| Approach: | They propose to use community-based graphs to augment hand-crafted features based on topic modeling and emotion detection on debate transcripts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach surpasses the benchmark results on the same dataset. |
GPolS: A Contextual Graph-Based Language Model for Analyzing Parliamentary Debates and Political Cohesion (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Parliamentary debates are a valuable language resource for analyzing comprehensive options in a functional, free society. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural model for political speech sentiment analysis exploiting semantic representations and relations between debate transcripts, motions, and political party members. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exploits semantic representations and relations between debate transcripts, motions, and political party members to predict political polarity and polarities. |
Inference Annotation of a Chinese Corpus for Opinion Mining (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tools for opinion mining can accurately predict the writer's attitude in simple explicit sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose to define inference, classify different types and provide an annotation framework to analyze the annotation results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework defines inference type, polarity and topic and analyzes the results. |
Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hao Li, Yuping Wu, Viktor Schlegel, Riza Batista-Navarro, Tharindu Madusanka, Iqra Zahid, Jiayan Zeng, Xiaochi Wang, Xinran He, Yizhi Li, Goran Nenadic
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have made it difficult to build an automated debate system that helps people to synthesise persuasive arguments. |
| Approach: | They propose to use an argument mining dataset to capture the end-to-end process of preparing an argumentative essay for a debate. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that it performs better on individual tasks than on human-centred evaluations. |
Classifier-based Polarity Propagation in a WordNet (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a wordnet-based sentiment lexicon can be built to express sentiment polarity in a way shared across domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to build a sense-level sentiment lexicon on the basis of a wordnet . they use a rich set of wordnet-based features to recognize and assign sentiment polarity values . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method allows for the construction of a more reliable sentiment lexicon . the proposed method is partially automated, but it's performance drops in cross-domain applications . |
An Ensemble of Humour, Sarcasm, and Hate Speechfor Sentiment Classification in Online Reviews (D19-55)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm, humor, hate speech, and sentiment are a complex language attribute . sentiment classification models are used for complex language understanding tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a two-step model that extracts features pertaining to sarcasm, humour, hate speech, as well as sentiment from online reviews and feeds them to inform sentiment classification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on sarcasm, humor, hate speech and sentiment classification . it can be combined with other models to achieve similar results . |
Revisiting the Importance of Encoding Logic Rules in Sentiment Classification (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural models that explicitly encode word order, syntax and semantic features are unequipped to deal with complex syntactic structures that affect sentiment, such as contrastive conjunctions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextualized ELMo embeddings instead of logic rules to compare models on syntactically complex sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform baseline models even on sentences with ambiguous sentiment labels. |
The ParlaSent Multilingual Training Dataset for Sentiment Identification in Parliamentary Proceedings (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The paper presents a new training dataset of sentences in 7 languages, manually annotated for sentiment, which is used in a series of experiments focused on training a robust sentiment identifier for parliamentary proceedings. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset of sentences manually annotated for sentiment to train a robust sentiment identifier for parliamentary proceedings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs very well on languages not seen during fine-tuning and additional fine- tuning data from other languages significantly improves the target parliament’s results. |
A Recorded Debating Dataset (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Tamar Lavee, Hong-Kwang Kuo, Samuel Thomas, Leslie Sager, Lili Kotlerman, Elad Venezian, Noam Slonim
| Challenge: | Existing research in computational argumentation and debating technologies focuses on argumentation mining, but other tasks are being addressed as well. |
| Approach: | They describe a dataset of debating speeches in English that is used for research . they use an automatic speech recognition system to produce a more "nLP-friendly" text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset contains 60 speeches on various controversial topics, each in five formats corresponding to different stages in production. |