Analyzing Sentence Fusion in Abstractive Summarization (D19-54)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization systems struggle to combine information from multiple sources, resulting in poor grammar and incorrect facts.
Approach: They analyze the outputs of five abstractive summarization systems and examine their grammatical accuracy and faithfulness.
Outcome: The proposed summarization systems are able to combine information from multiple sources, but they often fail to remain faithful to the original document.

Similar Papers

Scoring Sentence Singletons and Pairs for Abstractive Summarization (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for summarizing content from single sentences are inadequately understood.
Approach: They propose to combine singletons and pairs to create a summarizing sentence . they use a dataset of human-written abstracts to examine human-writing methods .
Outcome: The proposed framework is based on human-written abstracts from three large datasets.
Learning to Fuse Sentences with Transformers for Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization systems that fuse sentences are not rewarded for correctly fusing sentences.
Approach: They propose to leverage the knowledge of points of correspondence between sentences to enhance their ability to fuse sentences.
Outcome: The proposed algorithms improve the ability of the proposed summarization systems to fuse sentences and show that they can fuse sentences in a way that retains the original meaning.
Abstractive Unsupervised Multi-Document Summarization using Paraphrastic Sentence Fusion (C18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new method for abstractive summarization is being developed for document summarizing . abstractive methods require extensive natural language generation to rewrite the sentences .
Approach: They propose an unsupervised abstractive summarization system in multi-document context . they use a paraphrastic sentence fusion model which performs sentence synthesis and paraphrazing .
Outcome: The proposed model improves information coverage and abstractiveness of generated sentences.
Source Identification in Abstractive Summarization (2024.eacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies define input sentences that contain essential information in the generated summary as source sentences.
Approach: They define input sentences that contain essential information in the generated summary as source sentences and analyze the source sentences to determine how abstractive summaries are made.
Outcome: The proposed method performs well in abstractive settings, while similarity-based methods perform robustly in extractive settings.
On the Abstractiveness of Neural Document Summarization (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that document summarization systems are abstractive . authors suggest that automated summarizing systems could be improved .
Approach: They propose to use a pure copy system to verify abstractiveness of document summarization systems.
Outcome: The proposed system produces abstractive summaries while being far more efficient.
Abstractive Summarizers are Excellent Extractive Summarizers (2023.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization systems have traditionally been fragmented, limiting the benefits of compatible models.
Approach: They propose three new inference algorithms using sequence-to-sequence architectures to model extractive summarization with an abstractive summmarization system.
Outcome: The proposed algorithms outperform existing models on CNN and Dailymail and show that they are more efficient than existing models.
Legal Case Document Summarization: Extractive and Abstractive Methods and their Evaluation (2022.aacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Summarization of legal case judgement documents is a challenging problem in Legal NLP.
Approach: They propose to use extractive and abstractive summarization methods to evaluate legal document summarizing systems.
Outcome: The proposed methods have been evaluated on three legal summarization datasets.
Abstractive Document Summarization without Parallel Data (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization typically relies on large collections of paired articles and summaries.
Approach: They propose a system that relies only on example summaries and non-matching articles . they use an unsupervised sentence extractor that selects salient sentences .
Outcome: The proposed system performs well on CNN/DailyMail benchmark and automatic generating a press release from a scientific journal article.
Understanding the Behaviour of Neural Abstractive Summarizers using Contrastive Examples (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Neural abstractive summarization systems generate summary texts conditioned on the input source text, and have recently achieved high ROUGE scores on benchmark summarizing datasets.
Approach: They propose to analyze existing neural abstractive summarization systems by comparing their performance to human-written summaries.
Outcome: The proposed systems perform better than human-written summarizations on different datasets and show that they are able to understand deeper syntactic and semantic structures.
Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization (D19-54)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: EMNLP 2017 is a workshop on enhancing natural language processing's ability to produce concise, fluent summaries.
Approach: the workshop provides a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas towards automatic summarization . four invited speakers will be present at the workshop .
Outcome: the workshop aims to provide a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas towards automatic summarization.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations