Challenge: Existing evaluation methods for summarization systems measure semantic overlap between a system summary and a human reference on word-string level.
Approach: They propose to use distributed representations to evaluate system summary and human reference on word-string level.
Outcome: The proposed representations outperform ROUGE on recent corpora but are less good on test data used in previous studies.

Similar Papers

Re-Evaluating Evaluation for Multilingual Summarization (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that automated evaluation approaches correlate with human ratings in English, but this is unclear for other languages.
Approach: They construct a small-scale pilot dataset containing article-summary pairs and human ratings in English, Chinese and Indonesian to measure the strength of summaries.
Outcome: The results show that standard metrics are unreliable measures of quality in Chinese and Indonesian.
SueNes: A Weakly Supervised Approach to Evaluating Single-Document Summarization via Negative Sampling (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on automatic summary evaluation metrics focus on lexical similarity and require a reference summary which is expensive to obtain.
Approach: They propose to use a weakly supervised summary evaluation approach without the presence of reference summaries to transform existing summarization datasets into corrupted reference summarizers.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baselines and shows that it improves linguistic quality over all metrics.
An Anchor-Based Automatic Evaluation Metric for Document Summarization (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing reference-based evaluation metrics such as ROUGE have their own drawbacks.
Approach: They propose a protocol for a reference-based automatic evaluation metric that requires the endorsement of source document.
Outcome: The proposed metric is anchored on source document and has higher correlation with human judgments.
Summarization Evaluation in the Absence of Human Model Summaries Using the Compositionality of Word Embeddings (C18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing summary evaluation methods rely on multiple model summaries to evaluate quality of summary outputs.
Approach: They propose a new summary evaluation approach that does not require human model summaries . they exploit compositional capabilities of word embeddings to develop features .
Outcome: The proposed metric replicates human-generated summarization scores on data from TAC 2008 and 2009 . the features are then used to train a learning model for predicting the summary content quality in the absence of gold models.
A Graph-theoretic Summary Evaluation for ROUGE (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: ROUGE is one of the most widely used evaluation metrics for text summarization.
Approach: They propose to use ROUGE to evaluate summaries based on lexical and semantic similarities.
Outcome: The proposed method improves ROUGE's correlation with human judgments by exploiting lexical and semantic similarities.
Evaluation Metrics for Headline Generation Using Deep Pre-Trained Embeddings (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent generative language models have shown promise in abstractive summarization tasks.
Approach: They propose to use Fr echet embedding distance and angular embeddable similarity to evaluate the performance of generative language models in abstractive summarization tasks.
Outcome: The proposed metric shows close relation with human judgments and has overall better correlations with them.
How Far are We from Robust Long Abstractive Summarization? (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization has made tremendous progress in recent years . however, even under a short document setting, abstractive models often generate summaries that are repetitive, ungrammatical, and factually inconsistent with the source.
Approach: They perform fine-grained human annotations to evaluate long document abstractive summarization systems and develop factual consistency metrics.
Outcome: The proposed model can generate more relevant summaries but not factual ones.
Revisiting Automatic Evaluation of Extractive Summarization Task: Can We Do Better than ROUGE? (2022.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to evaluate text summarization tasks using ROUGE have been criticized for lack of semantic understanding.
Approach: They propose a semantic-aware metric for extractive summarization task that is semantic-based . they use CNN/DailyMail dataset to study the new metric .
Outcome: The proposed metric is semantic-aware and shows higher correlation with human judgement and yields a large number of disagreements with the original ROUGE metric.
Automated Metrics for Medical Multi-Document Summarization Disagree with Human Evaluations (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work has shown that models may exploit shortcuts that are difficult to detect using standard n-gram similarity metrics such as ROUGE.
Approach: They propose to use human-assessed summary quality facets and pairwise preferences to improve MDS evaluation methods.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve the quality of literature review summarization models . they use human-assessed summary quality facets and pairwise preferences .
On the Correlation of Word Embedding Evaluation Metrics (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Word embeddings are geometrical representations of word paradigmatics and syntagmatics.
Approach: They propose to investigate evaluation metrics on various datasets to find correlations . they propose a fast solution to select the best word embeddings among many others .
Outcome: The proposed method could be used to select the best word embeddings among many others.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations