Object Hallucination in Image Captioning (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing image captioning metrics do not capture image relevance . current metrics only measure similarity to ground truth captions .
Approach: They propose a new image relevance metric to evaluate captioning models with veridical visual labels and assess their rate of object hallucination.
Outcome: The proposed metrics show that models with veridical visual labels have higher hallucination rates than models with lower hallucinosity.

Similar Papers

ALOHa: A New Measure for Hallucination in Captioning Models (2024.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metric for object hallucination, CHAIR, is limited to MS COCO objects and synonyms.
Approach: They propose a new open-vocabulary metric, ALOHa, which leverages large language models to measure object hallucinations.
Outcome: The proposed metric correctly identifies 13.6% more hallucinated objects than CHAIR on HAT and 30.8% more on nocaps.
Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models? (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) often hallucinate and produce captions that mention concepts that cannot be found in the image.
Approach: They propose to add grounding objectives to captions that explicitly align image regions or objects to text spans to reduce hallucination.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation protocol reduces the amount of hallucination in LVLMs by adding grounding objectives.
Plausible May Not Be Faithful: Probing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Pre-training (2023.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large-scale vision-language pre-trained (VLP) models generate unfaithful or nonsensical texts given the source input, which is called hallucination.
Approach: They propose a VLP loss-based model to mitigate object hallucination by decoupling VLP objectives and a token-level image-text alignment.
Outcome: The proposed model reduces object hallucination by 17.4% on two benchmarks.
Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) suffer from object hallucinations, i.e., they tend to generate objects inconsistent with the target images in the descriptions.
Approach: They propose to integrate powerful large vision-language models (LVLMs) they propose a polling-based query method to evaluate object hallucination .
Outcome: The proposed model can evaluate object hallucination in a more stable and flexible way.
Evaluating and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models: Can They Still See Removed Objects? (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: LVLMs often mistakenly determine objects as present in images where they do not exist . authors propose a new benchmark to evaluate object hallucinations by removing objects from images and asking the model whether it can still see the removed objects.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate object hallucinations by removing objects from images . they propose oDPO, a direct preference optimization objective based on visual objects .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark reduces the likelihood of object hallucinations by removing objects from images and asking the model whether it can still see the removed objects.
Evaluating Evaluation Metrics – The Mirage of Hallucination Detection (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large-scale empirical evaluation of hallucination detection metrics is conducted . hallucinosity is a significant obstacle to the reliability and widespread adoption of language models .
Approach: They conduct large-scale empirical evaluation of hallucination detection metrics . they compare hallucinian language models, language models and decoding methods .
Outcome: The results show that the evaluations of hallucination detection metrics fail to align with human judgments, they say . they also show that evaluations with LLM-based evaluation yield the best overall results .
Mitigating Open-Vocabulary Caption Hallucinations (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for image captioning ignore the long-tailed nature of hallucinations . a new framework is proposed to address hallucines in image captions in the open-vocabulary setting .
Approach: They propose a framework to address hallucinations in image captioning in the open-vocabulary setting.
Outcome: The proposed framework surpasses the CHAIR benchmark in diversity and accuracy in open-vocabulary captioning.
Do Language Models Know When They’re Hallucinating References? (2024.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: State-of-the-art language models (LMs) are notoriously susceptible to generating hallucinated information.
Approach: They propose to use hallucinated book and article references as "model organism" of hallucinism research . authors propose queries to the language model to identify hallucinous references .
Outcome: The authors show that language models can identify hallucinated references without external resources . they show that LMs often produce inconsistent author lists for hallucinos, but also accurately recall the authors of real references .
Perceptual Hallucination in Vision–Language Models: Definition, Analysis and Verification (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have dramatically improved text understanding and generation capabilities.
Approach: They define perceptual hallucination as the phenomenon where VLMs generate information as if perceived, despite absent or damaged visual evidence.
Outcome: The proposed model reduces hallucination exposure by 36% on average, with reductions of up to 88%.
TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluation (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics based on text-level comparisons fail to assess the quality of captions produced by machines.
Approach: They propose to use a machine-learned text-image grounding model to measure the accuracy of machine-generated captions and their correlation with human judgments.
Outcome: The proposed metric has higher consistency with human judgments and is more accurate than existing metrics.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations