CLICKER: Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing via In-Context Learning with Adaptive Stepwise Reasoning (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods are static and fail to propagate edits across languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a KE method that dynamically retrieves only knowledge relevant to a given query and edits it to maintain cross-lingual consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms static KE methods on a multilingual dataset with semantically similar but irrelevant prompts. |
Similar Papers
Editing Across Languages: A Survey of Multilingual Knowledge Editing (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge Editing is a growing subdomain of model editing focused on ensuring factual edits generalize across languages. |
| Approach: | They present a taxonomy of multilingual knowledge editing methods and benchmarks . authors summarize key findings on method effectiveness and transfer patterns . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are compared against available benchmarks and benchmark datasets. |
Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique to adapt large language models to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual dataset to translate a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset from English to Chinese and then to evaluate their performance in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can change model performance on several special cases without retraining from scratch. |
Edit Once, Update Everywhere: A Simple Framework for Cross-Lingual Knowledge Synchronization in LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to update large language models focus on single-language editing or basic multilingual editing, failing to achieve true cross-linguistic knowledge synchronization. |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-linguistic knowledge democracy edit technique to improve cross-lingual performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves cross-lingual performance while maintaining high accuracy in monolingual settings. |
BMIKE-53: Investigating Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing with In-Context Learning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a benchmark for cross-lingual knowledge editing, knowledge editing is underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for cross-lingual in-context knowledge editing that spans 53 languages and three KE datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark systematically evaluates cross-lingual knowledge editing (IKE) under zero-shot, one-shot and few-shot setups. |
Retrieval-Augmented Multilingual Knowledge Editing (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing (KE) is an effective and economical alternative to inject new knowledge or to fix factual errors in Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual knowledge editing method that can be used to update knowledge in LLMs by concatenating new knowledge retrieved from a knowledge base with users’ prompts before querying an LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baseline knowledge editing methods by a significant margin and is scalable to real-word application scenarios. |
XRICL: Cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented In-Context Learning for Cross-lingual Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work focuses on English datasets, and it is unclear whether large language models can serve as competitive semantic parsers for other languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that learns to retrieve relevant English exemplars for a given query to construct prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework learns to retrieve relevant English exemplars for a given query to construct prompts. |
Cross-Lingual Multi-Hop Knowledge Editing (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work on knowledge editing in monolingual settings focused on a single language, but there are significant gaps in performance between the two settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-lingual multi-hop knowledge editing paradigm for measuring and analyzing the performance of various SoTA knowledge editing techniques in a multilingual setup. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves on previous methods in a cross-lingual setting and in English. |
Breaking the Language Barrier: Improving Cross-Lingual Reasoning with Structured Self-Attention (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that multilingual language models (MultiLMs) are capable of logically reasoning over natural language statements, reasoning with their implicit knowledge, and performing multi-step reasoning when the model size is large enough. |
| Approach: | They propose a mechanism that encourages cross-lingual attention in code-switched sequences and improves reasoning performance by up to 14%. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves reasoning performance by 14% and 4% on the RuleTaker and LeapOfThought datasets. |
StepKE: Stepwise Knowledge Editing for Multi-Hop Question Answering (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods overlook interplay with pre-existing knowledge, leading to inconsistent edit propagation. |
| Approach: | stepKE integrates edited and existing knowledge for coherent multi-hop reasoning . stepKE decomposes multi-step questions into sequential single-hop sub-questions . |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that StepKE generates more accurate and consistent responses than baselines. |
Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge Editing (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong, Xingshan Zeng, Jiahui Gao, Liangyou Li, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Qun Liu, Wei Wang
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing techniques rely on memorizing updated knowledge, impeding LLMs from effectively combining the new knowledge with their inherent knowledge when answering questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a Learning to Edit framework that equips LLMs with the ability to apply updated knowledge to input questions through a two-phase process . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in knowledge editing tasks and compares it with four benchmarks and two LLM architectures. |