Challenge: Large language models excel at capturing communicative intent, but they have a side effect: pragmatic hallucination.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to quantify the impact of pragmatic hallucination on large language models . they propose RLHF and SFT to induce a strong tendency for pragmatic over-attribution .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing models in predicting pragmatic hallucinations . the evaluations show that current alignment paradigms lack precise control over pragmatic boundaries .

Similar Papers

Fine-Grained Detection of Context-Grounded Hallucinations Using LLMs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing representations of hallucinations limit the types of errors that can be expressed, so we propose a new representation based on free-form textual descriptions, capturing the full range of possible errors.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for localizing hallucinations using LLMs with a human annotation of over 1,000 examples and a protocol to verify its quality in a humans evaluation.
Outcome: The proposed representation captures the full range of possible errors, and the best model achieves an F1 score of 0.67.
Analyzing LLM Behavior in Dialogue Summarization: Unveiling Circumstantial Hallucination Trends (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in large language models have improved summarization, but they still face a challenge of hallucination.
Approach: They propose a taxonomy of errors to address the problem of hallucination in LLMs . they propose two prompt-based approaches for fine-grained error detection .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing metrics in identifying the novel "Contextual Inference" error type.
Why LLMs Hallucinate on Structured Knowledge: A Mechanistic Analysis of Reasoning over Linearized Representations (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing literature primarily addresses this problem through external interventions such as retrieval augmentation and prompt engineering at the input or output level.
Approach: They find that LLMs can still produce hallucinated outputs when using structured external knowledge.
Outcome: The proposed models fail to ground the provided knowledge, causing the model to revert to parametric memory.
Rolling the DICE on Idiomaticity: How LLMs Fail to Grasp Context (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models fail to resolve idiomaticity when it depends on contextual understanding . idiom frequency influences performance but does not guarantee accurate interpretation.
Approach: They propose a novel contrastive dataset to assess whether large language models can effectively leverage context to disambiguate idiomatic meanings.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better on sentences deemed more likely by the model . collocational frequency and sentence probability influence performance but not accuracy .
Harmful Factuality: LLMs Correcting What They Shouldn’t (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained for factual accuracy, but can conflict with the critical demand for source fidelity.
Approach: They propose a reproducible framework to elicit and measure HFH using controlled entity-level perturbations and strategic entity selection.
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces HFH rates by 50% across summarization, rephrasing, and QA tasks.
Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decoding (2024.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language models (LMs) often struggle to pay enough attention to the input context, and generate texts that are unfaithful or contain hallucinations.
Approach: They propose a context-aware decoding technique that amplifies the difference between the output probabilities when a model is used with and without context.
Outcome: The proposed model significantly improves faithfulness of different LM families including OPT, GPT, LLaMA, and FLAN-T5 for summarization tasks.
Stochastic Chameleons: Irrelevant Context Hallucinations Reveal Class-Based (Mis)Generalization in LLMs (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that LLMs reproduce training artifacts, exploit spurious correlations, and fail when faced with distribution shifts.
Approach: They examine irrelevant context hallucinations in which models integrate misleading contextual cues into their predictions.
Outcome: The proposed model errors are reflected in the model's internal computations, and they are consistent with previous studies.
PRISM: Probing Reasoning, Instruction, and Source Memory in LLM Hallucinations (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for hallucination evaluation rely on mixed queries and posterior evaluation, which quantifies hallucinosity severity but offers limited insight into where and why they occur.
Approach: They propose a controlled benchmark that disentangles hallucinations into four dimensions: knowledge missing, knowledge errors, reasoning errors, and instruction-following errors.
Outcome: The proposed model disentangles hallucinations into four dimensions: knowledge missing, knowledge errors, reasoning errors, and instruction-following errors.
The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models - An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in Large Language Models have generated widespread acclaim, but hallucination has also emerged as a by-product.
Approach: They propose a fine-grained discourse on profiling hallucination based on its degree, orientation, and category . they categorize hallucines into six types: acronym ambiguity, generated golem, virtual voice, geographic erratum, time wrap .
Outcome: The proposed method categorizes hallucination into six types based on their degree, orientation, and category .
The Pragmatic Mind of Machines: Tracing the Emergence of Pragmatic Competence in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated emerging capabilities in social intelligence tasks, including implicature resolution and theory-of-mind reasoning.
Approach: They introduce a dataset grounded in the pragmatic concept of alternatives to evaluate whether large language models can accurately infer nuanced speaker intentions.
Outcome: The proposed model can infer nuanced speaker intentions by inferring the speaker’s intended meaning and explaining when and why a speaker would choose one utterance over its alternative.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations