Challenge: Existing shortening methods for long reasoning models rely on additional supervision or multi-stage post-training.
Approach: They propose a lazy length penalty that imposes length pressure on models without extra training stages.
Outcome: The proposed method significantly reduces response length without extra training stages while maintaining or improving performance.

Similar Papers

Beyond Token Length: Step Pruner for Efficient and Accurate Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing reinforcement learning methods for large reasoning models suffer from excessive verbosity, known as "overthinking." Existing models penalize generated tokens to promote conciseness, but these methods encounter two challenges: they may develop hacking behavior in later stages of training by discarding reasoning steps.
Approach: They propose a framework that steers large reasoning models toward more efficient reasoning . they prioritize correctness while imposing penalties for redundant steps .
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces token usage by 69.7% on AIME24.
Anti-Length Shift: Dynamic Outlier Truncation for Training Efficient Reasoning Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing efficient reasoning methods rely on explicit length penalties for excessive verbosity on simple queries.
Approach: They propose a training-time intervention that selectively suppresses redundant tokens . they find length shift occurs when models generate unnecessary reasoning on trivial inputs - a phenomenon that is often unexplored .
Outcome: The proposed method reduces inference token usage by 78% while increasing accuracy compared to the initial policy and surpasses state-of-the-art efficient reasoning methods.
LEASH: Adaptive Length Penalty and Reward Shaping for Efficient Large Reasoning Model (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to long reasoning traces are hard to tune and fail to adapt to evolving LLMs.
Approach: They propose a reinforcement learning framework that optimizes the length of reasoning traces by a Lagrangian primal–dual method.
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces the average reasoning length by 60% across diverse tasks while maintaining competitive performance.
Not All Tokens Matter: Towards Efficient LLM Reasoning via Token Significance in Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) often produce unnecessarily long explanations that reduce efficiency.
Approach: They propose a length-aware reward that selectively penalizes insignificance tokens . they also propose 'dynamic length control' that encourages more detailed reasoning .
Outcome: The proposed method reduces response length while maintaining correctness, the authors show . it selectively penalizes insignificance tokens while maintaining accuracy .
Optimizing Length Compression in Large Reasoning Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Reasoning Models suffer from producing unnecessary and verbose reasoning chains.
Approach: They propose a post-training method that uses a Length Reward and a Compress Reward to remove the invalid portion of the thinking process.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces sequence length by 50% with only a marginal (2%) drop in accuracy.
ReCUT: Balancing Reasoning Length and Accuracy in LLMs via Stepwise Trails and Preference Optimization (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to train LLMs suffer from overthinking, leading to lengthy reasoning traces . Existing approaches to train large language models suffer from this problem .
Approach: They propose a method to combine multiple reasoning chains for training LLMs . they use stepwise exploration and long-short switched sampling to evaluate reasoning paths .
Outcome: The proposed method reduces reasoning lengths by approximately 30-50% . it also maintains or improves reasoning accuracy compared to baselines .
Correct, Concise and Complete: Multi-stage Training For Adaptive Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) increase test-time computation, often in the form of chain-of-thought (CoT) however, reasoning traces can become unnecessarily long, increasing computation costs without improving accuracy and sometimes even degrading performance.
Approach: They propose a multi-stage efficient reasoning method that combines supervised fine-tuning with reinforcement learning using an adaptive length penalty.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces response length by an average of 28% for 8B models and 40% for 32B models while incurring only minor performance drops of 1.6 and 2.5 points, respectively.
AutoL2S: Auto Long-Short Reasoning for Efficient Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to distilling large language models (LLMs) are inefficient and generate excessively long chain-of-thought reasoning even for inputs that admit concise solutions.
Approach: They propose a distillation framework that empowers non-reasoning LLMs to think only when necessary.
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces reasoning length up to 71% with minimal accuracy loss while preserving accuracy.
Stabilizing Efficient Reasoning with Step-Level Advantage Selection (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models generate long and verbose reasoning traces at inference time . short context post-training alone induces substantial reasoning compression .
Approach: They propose a step-level advantage selection approach that reduces reasoning length by over 30% . they propose to use GRPO without any length-aware objective to train models in a shorter context window .
Outcome: The proposed approach reduces average reasoning length by over 30% while improving Pass@1 accuracy by 3.79 points over the strongest length-aware baseline.
Step Potential Advantage Estimation: Harnessing Intermediate Confidence and Correctness for Efficient Mathematical Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to RLVR provide sparse supervision since reward arrives only after the full generation is complete.
Approach: They propose a step-level reward system that extracts confidence and correctness and combines them into a Step Potential signal that explicitly estimates reasoning state at each step.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods on multiple benchmarks and improves accuracy while reducing response length.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations