FrontCoder: Scaling Visual Fidelity in Front-End Code Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jun Feng, Jian Yang, Wei Zhang, Jing Wang, Keyi Chen, Xiaokun Yang, Weicheng Gu, Yihang Lou, Yan Bai, Xianglong Liu
| Challenge: | Existing work on front-end code generation fails to provide visual fidelity and rendering quality for front- end developers. |
| Approach: | They propose a three-stage pipeline to enhance front-end code generation capabilities in LLMs . they use synthetic data, quality-controlled supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves competitive performance with frontier models while maintaining generation efficiency. |
Similar Papers
UnitCoder: Scalable Code Synthesis from Pre-training Corpora (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code understanding and generation, yet code generation remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that supervises pre-training data quality through automatically generated unit tests while ensuring correctness via an iterative fix and refine flow. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance on a large dataset with high quality pre-training data. |
StepCoder: Improving Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Compiler Feedback (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shihan Dou, Yan Liu, Haoxiang Jia, Enyu Zhou, Limao Xiong, Junjie Shan, Caishuang Huang, Xiao Wang, Xiaoran Fan, Zhiheng Xi, Yuhao Zhou, Tao Ji, Rui Zheng, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing work integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality but the long code generated by LLMs makes RL exploration ineffective. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning and compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks and integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to improve code generation quality. |
A Survey of Post-Training Scaling in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hanyu Lai, Xiao Liu, Junjie Gao, Jiale Cheng, Zehan Qi, Yifan Xu, Shuntian Yao, Dan Zhang, Jinhua Du, Zhenyu Hou, Xin Lv, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in understanding and generating human natural languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for scaling large language models using supervised fine-tuning, RLxF and test-time compute methodologies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to understand and generate human natural languages. |
CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Zifeng Wang, Chun-Liang Li, Vincent Perot, Long Le, Jin Miao, Zizhao Zhang, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister
| Challenge: | Recent work on generating diverse instructions and applying LLM to increase instruction complexity neglects downstream use cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for generating high-quality synthetic data for LLM alignment with different downstream instruction distributions and LLMs. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on four open-domain instruction using the proposed framework validate the effectiveness of CodecLM over the current state-of-the-art. |
CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CodeIF assesses the ability of large language models to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark designed to assess LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks across a wide range of complexity levels and programming domains. |
Integrating Symbolic Execution into the Fine-Tuning of Code-Generating LLMs (2025.naacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs) have become essential tools in modern software development, enhancing productivity and accelerating development. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Reinforcement Learning and Direct Preference Optimization to fine-tune code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs) by enhancing the training data with symbolic execution techniques. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the CodeRL benchmark and shows that it is more accurate and objective than the baseline model. |
OpenCoder: The Open Cookbook for Top-Tier Code Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Siming Huang, Tianhao Cheng, Jason Klein Liu, Weidi Xu, Jiaran Hao, Liuyihan Song, Yang Xu, Jian Yang, Jiaheng Liu, Chenchen Zhang, Linzheng Chai, Ruifeng Yuan, Xianzhen Luo, Qiufeng Wang, YuanTao Fan, Qingfu Zhu, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Yang Gao, Jie Fu, Qian Liu, Houyi Li, Ge Zhang, Yuan Qi, Xu Yinghui, Wei Chu, Zili Wang
| Challenge: | Code LLMs lack reproducible data pipelines and training protocols for reproducible advancements in code intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose a top-tier code LLM that releases model weights and inference code . reproducible data pipelines, rigorous experimental ablation results and training protocols are included . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves comparable performance to leading models and serves as an "open cookbook" reproducible training data, rigorous experimental ablation results, and detailed training protocols are also included in the model. |
VisCoder: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Executable Python Visualization Code Generation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing instruction-tuning datasets lack execution-grounded supervision and offer limited support for iterative code correction. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale instruction tuning dataset for Python-based visualization and self-correction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset outperforms strong open-source baselines and proprietary models like GPT-4o-mini. |
DocCGen: Document-based Controlled Code Generation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sameer Pimparkhede, Mehant Kammakomati, Srikanth Tamilselvam, Prince Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) produce state-of-the-art performance on natural language to code generation for resource-rich general-purpose languages like C++, Java, and Python. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that breaks the NL-to-Code generation task into two steps . they use library documentation to detect the correct libraries and schema rules extracted from the documentation to constrain the decoding . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves different sized language models across all six evaluation metrics, reducing syntactic and semantic errors in structured code. |
Grammar-Based Code Representation: Is It a Worthy Pursuit for LLMs? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Qingyuan Liang, Zhao Zhang, Zeyu Sun, Zheng Lin, Qi Luo, Xiao Yueyi, Yizhou Chen, Yuqun Zhang, Haotian Zhang, Lu Zhang, Chenbin Chenbin, Yingfei Xiong
| Challenge: | Existing research demonstrates the effectiveness of grammar-based code representations in small-scale models, showing their ability to reduce syntax errors and enhance performance. |
| Approach: | They develop a series of billion-scale grammar-based code representations that incorporate grammar rules into the code generation process. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on HumanEval and MBPP show that grammar-based representations reduce syntax errors and improve performance even in billion-scale models. |