Behavioral Consistency Validation for LLM Agents: An Analysis of Trading-Style Switching through Stock-Market Simulation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zeping Li, Guancheng Wan, Keyang Chen, Yu Chen, Yiwen Zhao, Philip Torr, Guangnan Ye, Zhenfei Yin, Hongfeng Chai
| Challenge: | Recent studies have applied Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents in financial stock market simulations to test if micro-level behaviors aggregate into macro-level phenomena. |
| Approach: | They propose four alignment metrics and use Mann–Whitney U tests to compare agents’ style-switching behavior with financial theory. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is only partially consistent with financial theory. |
Similar Papers
Do LLM Agents Really Mimic Humans? Diagnosing and Aligning Microeconomic Behaviors in Macro-ABMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on replicating macro-level stylized facts while neglecting verification of micro-level decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that replicates macro-level stylized facts while ignoring micro-level decision-making. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves alignment with human trends and captures behavioral heterogeneity. |
Agent Trading Arena: A Study on Numerical Understanding in LLM-Based Agents (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to large language models are limited to historical backtesting and static data. |
| Approach: | a new large-language model is developed to simulate real-time trading in a virtual stock market . the agent trading arena simulates real-world bid-ask interactions and provides real-life trading scenarios . |
| Outcome: | The Agent Trading Arena simulates real-world market conditions and directly impacts price dynamics. |
Evaluating Behavioral Alignment in Conflict Dialogue: A Multi-Dimensional Comparison of LLM Agents and Humans (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in socially complex, interaction-driven tasks, yet their ability to mirror human behavior in emotionally and strategically complex contexts remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They examine alignment of personality-prompted Large Language Models in conflict dialogues that incorporate negotiation by simulating a five-factor personality profile. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves the closest alignment with humans in linguistic style and emotional dynamics while Claude-3.7-Sonnet best reflects strategic behavior. |
Fin-Bias: Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM Decision-Making under human bias in Finance Domain (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are limited to small sample and fail to demonstrate LLM susceptibility to context with potential human bias. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating LLM investment decision-making when faced with uncertainty and possible human-biased opinions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can herd the explicit bias in context and even exceed human performance in predicting future stock return. |
Large Language Model Agents in Finance: A Survey Bridging Research, Practice, and Real-World Deployment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yifei Dong, Fengyi Wu, Kunlin Zhang, Yilong Dai, Sanjian Zhang, Wanghao Ye, Sihan Chen, Zhi-Qi Cheng
| Challenge: | a systematic review of large language models (LLMs) is conducted to better align their capabilities with real-world demands. |
| Approach: | They propose a functional taxonomy mapping financial domains to tasks, datasets, and institutional constraints. they catalog over 30 financial benchmarks and 20 representative models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model frameworks are bridging financial practice and LLM research. |
Can LLM Agents Simulate Multi-Turn Human Behavior? Evidence from Real Online Customer Behavior Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxuan Lu, Jing Huang, Yan Han, Bingsheng Yao, Sisong Bei, Yaochen Xie, Yisi Sang, Qi He, Dakuo Wang
| Challenge: | Recent research shows that LLM Agents can generate “believable” human behaviors via prompt-only methods, leaving open questions of whether they can accurately generate step-by-step actions in multi-turn interaction tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use shopping data to evaluate LLMs' ability to accurately generate step-by-step actions in a multi-turn interaction task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 17.26% action generation accuracy and 33.86% F1 score on final purchase prediction, representing improvements of 5.4% and 13.85% over baselines. |
InvestAlign: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Aligning Large Language Models with Investor Decision-Making Processes Under Herd Behavior (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | relying on authentic data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is costly and expensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that constructs high-quality SFT datasets by leveraging theoretical solutions to similar and simple optimal investment problems rather than the complex scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves faster parameter convergence than using real-user data, suggesting superior learning efficiency. |
Do LLMs Align Human Values Regarding Social Biases? Judging and Explaining Social Biases with LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models can lead to undesired consequences when misaligned with human values . previous studies have shown misalignment of LLMs with human value using expert-designed or agent-based emulated bias scenarios . |
| Approach: | They investigate whether large language models (LLMs) are misaligned with human values . they find no significant differences in understanding of HVSB between LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The results show that large language models do not have lower misalignment rates and attack success rates . the study also shows that smaller language models have the ability to explain HVSB . |
Noise, Adaptation, and Strategy: Assessing LLM Fidelity in Decision-Making (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for social science simulations . however, most evaluations focus on task optimality rather than variability and adaptation characteristic of human decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose a process-oriented evaluation framework with progressive interventions to evaluate two economics tasks using large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework targets two economic tasks with progressive interventions. |
AlignUSER: Human-Aligned LLM Agents via World Models for Recommender System Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation practices for recommender systems rely on few-shot prompting and offline metrics are often misaligned with online behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that learns world-model-driven agents from human interactions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables agents to express rich preferences and feedback in natural language and interact with recommender systems in a simulation. |