Why Do Multilingual Reasoning Gaps Emerge in Reasoning Language Models? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent reasoning language models (RLMs) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, yet they still exhibit a multilingual reasoning gap. |
| Approach: | They propose a strategy that incorporates an English translation into the initial reasoning trace when an understanding failure is detected. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy incorporates an English translation into the initial reasoning trace when an understanding failure is detected. |
Similar Papers
A Survey of Multilingual Reasoning in Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This survey provides the first in-depth review of multilingual reasoning in Language Models. |
| Approach: | This survey provides the first in-depth review of multilingual reasoning in LMs. |
| Outcome: | The present study provides the first in-depth review of multilingual reasoning in LMs. |
The Reasoning Lingua Franca: A Double-Edged Sword for Multilingual AI (2026.eacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are highly effective on mathematical, scientific, and other question-answering tasks. |
| Approach: | They compare an LRM's reasoning in English to that of a multilingual question . they find that English reasoning traces exhibit a substantially higher presence of cognitive behaviors . |
| Outcome: | The LRMs generate reasoning sequences in English, but the language of the question is not. |
Breaking the Language Barrier: Improving Cross-Lingual Reasoning with Structured Self-Attention (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that multilingual language models (MultiLMs) are capable of logically reasoning over natural language statements, reasoning with their implicit knowledge, and performing multi-step reasoning when the model size is large enough. |
| Approach: | They propose a mechanism that encourages cross-lingual attention in code-switched sequences and improves reasoning performance by up to 14%. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves reasoning performance by 14% and 4% on the RuleTaker and LeapOfThought datasets. |
Large Reasoning Models Are (Not Yet) Multilingual Latent Reasoners (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that large reasoning models arrive at the correct answer before completing textual reasoning steps, indicating the presence of latent reasoning. |
| Approach: | They conduct a systematic investigation of multilingual latent reasoning in large reasoning models across 11 languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model arrive at the correct answer before completing the reasoning steps, indicating the presence of latent reasoning. |
Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning language models (RLMs) excel at complex tasks by leveraging a chain-of-thought process to generate structured intermediate steps. |
| Approach: | They present the first systematic study of language mixing in reasoning language models, examining its patterns, impact, and internal causes across 15 languages, 7 task difficulty levels, and 18 subject areas. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates reasoning steps that include a mixture of languages when prompted in one language, and this improves accuracy. |
From Representation to Choice: Tracing Decision Emergence Across Languages in LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have made them highly multilingual, but how they internally reason remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose to model multilingual reasoning through a decision-making perspective using aligned multiple-choice questions from the mMMLU benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that languages share similar activation spaces, but subtle divergences emerge as decisions propagate through transformer layers. |
When Models Reason in Your Language: Controlling Thinking Language Comes at the Cost of Accuracy (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with thinking traces have shown strong performance on English reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They evaluate two leading LRMs with thinking traces on established benchmark XReasoning and propose directions for future research. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models often revert to English or produce fragmented reasoning in other languages, revealing a substantial gap in the capability of thinking in non-English languages. |
Breaking Language Barriers in Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning: Insights and Observations (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research focuses on developing powerful large language models for mathematical reasoning within monolingual languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to use translation to build powerful multilingual math reasoning models . they propose different training strategies to build xMR LLMs that outperform open-source LLM . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source LLMs and surpasses ChatGPT in few-shot scenarios. |
Multilingual Reasoning via Self-training (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have introduced eclectic strategies to improve reasoning beyond English, but these methods are related to specific language that is not always optimal for reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular approach that instructs models to structure reasoning passages in a different problem space and then self-refines their capabilities to deliver step-wise reasoning passage. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves significant improvements in multilingual reasoning of various models and task, with improved reasoning consistency across languages. |
Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | xSTREET exposes a gap in base LLM performance between English and non-English reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual structured reasoning and explanation dataset that covers four tasks across six languages and extends the English STREET benchmark to 5 additional diverse languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show improved multilingual performance on scientific commonsense reasoning subtasks and no regression on non-reasoning tasks. |