Challenge: Recent research explores multi-agent systems where agents collaborate toward shared goals to handle complex tasks.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for systematic evaluation of multi-agent collaboration under privacy constraints.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark shows that privacy constraints degrade collaboration performance and make outcomes depend more on the initiating agent than the partner.

Similar Papers

SILO-BENCH: A Scalable Environment for Evaluating Distributed Coordination in Multi-Agent LLM Systems (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks conflate coordination ability with role-based priors.
Approach: They propose a role-free benchmark for evaluating free-form collaboration under information silos.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark systematically probes coordination capabilities under information silos using 54 configurations and 3 frontier LLMs.
Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for privacy performance of LLM agents are limited to static, simplified scenarios.
Approach: They propose a model-agnostic, contextual integrity based mitigation approach that effectively reduces privacy leakage from 36.08% to 7.30% on DeepSeek-R1 and from 33.06% to 8.32% on GPT-4o.
Outcome: The proposed approach reduces privacy leakage from 36.08% to 7.30% on DeepSeek-R1 and from 33.06% to 8.32% on GPT-4o while preserving task helpfulness.
When 20 Agents Fail to Sort: The Distributed Sorting Benchmark for Scalable Multi-Agent Systems (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: MAS-BENCH isolates coordination under explicit communication constraints . CAMOC significantly improves coordination success and efficiency across backends .
Approach: They propose a distributed-sorting benchmark that isolates coordination under explicit communication constraints.
Outcome: MAS-BENCH improves coordination success and efficiency across backends . CAMOC significantly improves efficiency under shared-state interaction .
Privacy-R1: Privacy-Aware Multi-LLM Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior approaches to rewriting large language models shatters linguistic coherence and removes privacy-sensitive information.
Approach: They propose a framework that trains an agent to dynamically route text chunks . it implicitly distinguishes between replaceable Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and task-critical PII .
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on the privacy-utility frontier . it trains an agent to dynamically route text chunks, learning a policy that balances privacy leakage and task performance.
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for LLM-based mobile agents are insufficient to evaluate their capabilities.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based mobile agents' planning capabilities . they expand UI operations by incorporating 103 APIs to accelerate task completion .
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks are based on 103 collected APIs and real user queries . the data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT .
PII-Bench: Evaluating Query-Aware Privacy Protection Systems (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models do not detect PII in user prompts, despite their convenience . current models show significant limitations in determining PI I query relevance .
Approach: They propose a query-unrelated PII masking strategy and propose PIi-Bench . they propose 'quick-and-easy' PI I masking with a user query and context description .
Outcome: The proposed model performs well in basic PII detection, but shows significant limitations in query relevance.
MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents, yet existing benchmarks focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
Outcome: The proposed framework measures task completion and quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators.
ConVerse: Benchmarking Contextual Safety in Agent-to-Agent Conversations (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transitioning from passive text generators to autonomous agents that act and communicate on behalf of users.
Approach: a new benchmark evaluates privacy and security risks in agent–agent interactions . a converse model enables attackers to embed malicious requests within plausible discourse . the model is based on a three-tier taxonomy assessing abstraction quality .
Outcome: ConVerse tests privacy and security risks in agent–agent interactions with 12 user personas and over 864 contextually grounded attacks.
CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World Uncertainty (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents focus on task completion under idealistic settings but overlook reliability in real-world, user-facing applications.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks evaluate consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain.
AutoPenBench: A Vulnerability Testing Benchmark for Generative Agents (2025.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: LLM agents are promising for vulnerability testing, but lack benchmarks to evaluate and compare them.
Approach: They propose an open-source benchmark for the evaluation of vulnerability testing agents that includes 33 tasks ranging from introductory exercises to actual vulnerable systems.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark includes 33 tasks ranging from introductory exercises to actual vulnerable systems.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations