SILO-BENCH: A Scalable Environment for Evaluating Distributed Coordination in Multi-Agent LLM Systems (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuzhe Zhang, Feiran Liu, Yi Shan, Xinyi Huang, Xin Yang, Yueqi Zhu, Xuxin Cheng, Cao Liu, Ke Zeng, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Wenyuan Jiang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks conflate coordination ability with role-based priors. |
| Approach: | They propose a role-free benchmark for evaluating free-form collaboration under information silos. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark systematically probes coordination capabilities under information silos using 54 configurations and 3 frontier LLMs. |
Similar Papers
When 20 Agents Fail to Sort: The Distributed Sorting Benchmark for Scalable Multi-Agent Systems (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MAS-BENCH isolates coordination under explicit communication constraints . CAMOC significantly improves coordination success and efficiency across backends . |
| Approach: | They propose a distributed-sorting benchmark that isolates coordination under explicit communication constraints. |
| Outcome: | MAS-BENCH improves coordination success and efficiency across backends . CAMOC significantly improves efficiency under shared-state interaction . |
MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang, Shuyi Guo, Zhe Wang, Zhenhailong Wang, Cheng Qian, Robert Tang, Heng Ji, Jiaxuan You
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents, yet existing benchmarks focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework measures task completion and quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators. |
LLM-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent common-sense reasoning and Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities, making them promising candidates for developing coordination agents. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze coordination models in Pure Coordination settings where agents must cooperate to maximize gains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs through two distinct tasks: Agentic Coordination and Coordination Question Answering. |
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shihan Deng, Weikai Xu, Hongda Sun, Wei Liu, Tao Tan, Liujianfeng Liujianfeng, Ang Li, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Rui Yan, Shuo Shang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for LLM-based mobile agents are insufficient to evaluate their capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based mobile agents' planning capabilities . they expand UI operations by incorporating 103 APIs to accelerate task completion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are based on 103 collected APIs and real user queries . the data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT . |
PAC-BENCH: Evaluating Multi-Agent Collaboration under Privacy Constraints (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Minjun Park, Donghyun Kim, Hyeonjong Ju, Seungwon Lim, Dongwook Choi, Taeyoon Kwon, Minju Kim, Jinyoung Yeo
| Challenge: | Recent research explores multi-agent systems where agents collaborate toward shared goals to handle complex tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for systematic evaluation of multi-agent collaboration under privacy constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that privacy constraints degrade collaboration performance and make outcomes depend more on the initiating agent than the partner. |
TelAgentBench: A Multi-faceted Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Agents in Telecommunications (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Sunwoo Lee, Daseong Jang, Dhammiko Arya, Gyoung-eun Han, Injee Song, SaeRom Kim, Sangjin Kim, Seojin Lee, Seokyoung Hong, Sereimony Sek, Seung-Mo Cho, Sohee Park, Sungbin Yoon, Wonbeom Jang, Eric Davis
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming powerful agentic systems . generic benchmarks fail to assess realistic, non-English performance . |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate five core agentic capabilities: Reasoning, Planning, Action (tool-use), Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Instruction Following. |
| Outcome: | The evaluations reveal significant performance disparities between models that employ explicit reasoning and those that do not. |
CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World Uncertainty (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents focus on task completion under idealistic settings but overlook reliability in real-world, user-facing applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks evaluate consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain. |
AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Keyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang, Jie Sun, Yunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Shijie Xia, Xiaojie Cai, Tianze Xu, Weiye Si, Wenjie Li, Dequan Wang, Pengfei Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates 6 agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that closed-source models outperform open-source model (48.4% vs 32.1%) integrating models with advanced scaffolds to form autonomous agents is a paradigm shift. |
Can LLMs Help You at Work? A Sandbox for Evaluating LLM Agents in Enterprise Environments (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Enterprise systems are crucial for enhancing productivity and strategic growth, but data is fragmented across multiple sources and access controls are complex. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that simulates enterprise settings with 500 diverse tasks . they show that even the most capable models achieve only 41.8% task completion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that even the most capable models achieve only 41.8% task completion. |
FlowBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Workflow-Guided Planning for LLM-based Agents (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LLM-based agents are susceptible to undesired planning hallucinations when lacking specific knowledge for expertise-intensive tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the efficacy of workflow-guided agent planning by formalizing different formats of workflow knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark aims to improve the planning reliability of LLM-based agents by incorporating external workflow-related knowledge. |