LLM-induced Rationales for More Compact Explainable Style Classification Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for extracting explanations from complex models are based on discovering a large number of features, and this affects interpretability. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that leverages Large Language Models and clustering algorithms to discover a compact set of interpretable features. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces the number of features on 3 Style Classification tasks by 85–99% while reducing the number by 85. |
Similar Papers
Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models: A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on explainable AI focus on post-hoc explanation methods that interpret trained models through external approximations. |
| Approach: | They propose to categorize existing approaches into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approaches are categorized into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. |
LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiqiang Hu, Lei Wang, Yihuai Lan, Wanyu Xu, Ee-Peng Lim, Lidong Bing, Xing Xu, Soujanya Poria, Roy Lee
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown unprecedented performance across various tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose an easy-to-use framework that integrates adapters into LLMs . they evaluate adapters on 14 datasets from two different reasoning tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to fine-tune open-access language models with task-specific data and instruction data. |
RANCC: Rationalizing Neural Networks via Concept Clustering (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that construct explanations concurrently with classification predictions are opaque. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-explainable model for Natural Language Processing (NLP) text classification tasks . they extract a rationale from the text and use it to predict a concept of interest . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be compressed without complicated compression techniques. |
Unveiling Decision-Making in LLMs for Text Classification : Extraction of influential and interpretable concepts with Sparse Autoencoders (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Concept-based explanations for large language models are not well understood in text classification. |
| Approach: | They propose a model with a specialized classifier head and activation rate sparsity loss for sentence classification . they compare it to existing models with HI-Concept and ConceptShap . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves both the causality and interpretability of the extracted features. |
Explainable Text Classification with LLMs: Enhancing Performance through Dialectical Prompting and Explanation-Guided Training (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing explanation methods that generate keywords may be less effective due to missing critical contextual information. |
| Approach: | They propose a new method to generate explanations for possible labels using LLMs and a dialectical prompt. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves accuracy and explanation quality over state-of-the-art methods on multiple datasets from diverse domains. |
Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) provide potential for uncovering structured, human-interpretable representations in Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They analyze SAEs for interpretable feature extraction from Large Language Models in safety-critical classification tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms hidden-state and BoW models while demonstrating cross-lingual toxicity detection and visual classification tasks. |
Enabling LLM Knowledge Analysis via Extensive Materialization (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have majorly advanced NLP and AI, and a major success factor is their internalized factual knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to comprehensively materialize an LLM’s factual knowledge through recursive querying and result consolidation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method provides constructive insights into the scope and structure of LLM knowledge (or beliefs) it provides scale, accuracy, bias, cutoff and consistency at the same time. |
Can LLMs Augment Low-Resource Reading Comprehension Datasets? Opportunities and Challenges (2024.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive zero-shot performance on a wide range of NLP tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to augment extractive reading comprehension datasets by fine-tuning their annotations and comparing their performance to human annotators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to augment extractive reading comprehension datasets. |
Characterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Tasks (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models generate fluent text with minimal task-specific supervision, but their ability to generate rationales for knowledge-intensive tasks (KITs) remains under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate retrieval-augmented rationalization of KIT model predictions via external knowledge guidance within a few-shot setting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed rationales were compared with crowd-sourced rationale models on factuality, sufficiency, and convincingness. |
Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | specialized LLMs are often limited in domain-specific applications that require specialized knowledge. |
| Approach: | They provide a comprehensive overview of four key methods to enhance large language models by integrating domain-specific knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are categorized into four key approaches: dynamic knowledge injection, static knowledge embedding, modular adapters, and prompt optimization. |