Challenge: Existing benchmarks focus on English and underexplore how linguistic structure contributes to temporal meaning.
Approach: They propose a Turkish benchmark to evaluate temporal understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) their benchmark examines Reichenbach’s temporal points and reported speech through date arithmetic .
Outcome: The proposed model fails to resolve reported speech and fails to generalize across word order variations.

Similar Papers

ChronoSense: Exploring Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models with Time Intervals of Events (2025.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) still face significant challenges in reasoning and arithmetic.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark to evaluate LLMs' temporal understanding that includes 16 tasks identifying the Allen relation between two temporal events and temporal arithmetic.
Outcome: The proposed model handles Allen relations, even symmetrical ones, quite differently.
Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Temporal reasoning is a vital component of human communication and understanding, yet remains an underexplored area within the context of Large Language Models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose to use 3 prompting strategies to evaluate 8 different LLMs across 6 datasets and 2 Code Generation LMs to perform the analysis.
Outcome: The proposed models perform better on NLP tasks than the standard models on the same dataset.
Remember This Event That Year? Assessing Temporal Information and Understanding in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly ubiquitous, yet their ability to effectively retain and reason about temporal information remains limited.
Approach: They propose six metrics to assess three learning paradigms to enhance temporal knowledge acquisition.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve performance and reduce incorrect outputs.
Perceive the Passage of Time: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Model in Temporal Relativity (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Temporal perception is crucial for Large Language Models to understand the world.
Approach: They propose a temporal-relative ability benchmark to evaluate LLMs' temporal perception . they conduct extensive experiments on popular LLM GPT-4 scenarios .
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show a significant performance gap between LLMs and humans in temporal-relative capability.
Evaluating Large Language Models on Time Series Feature Understanding: A Comprehensive Taxonomy and Benchmark (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are a critical tool for time series analysis and reporting in many fields, including healthcare, finance, climate, and many more.
Approach: They propose a framework for rigorously evaluating the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) on time series understanding, encompassing both univariate and multivariate forms.
Outcome: The proposed framework delineates various characteristics inherent in time series data.
ETRQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Event Temporal Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Event temporal reasoning (ETR) is a significant indicator that a large language model understands the physical world.
Approach: They propose a unified taxonomy for event temporal questions and construct a benchmark based on this taxonomies.
Outcome: The proposed taxonomy inherits and expands existing datasets and contains multiple categories of compound questions.
DateLogicQA: Benchmarking Temporal Biases in Large Language Models (2025.naacl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: DateLogicQA examines temporal biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) 190 questions are curated by humans to examine temporal reasoning across date formats and contexts .
Approach: They propose a human-curated benchmark of 190 questions specifically designed to understand temporal bias in Large Language Models.
Outcome: The proposed dataset covers seven date formats across past, present, and future contexts . it examines four reasoning types: commonsense, factual, conceptual, and numerical .
Analyzing Temporal Complex Events with Large Language Models? A Benchmark towards Temporal, Long Context Understanding (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing research in complex event analysis has made significant strides but is constrained by inadequate natural language processing techniques.
Approach: They propose a novel approach using Large Language Models to extract and analyze the event chain within TCE, characterized by their key points and timestamps.
Outcome: The proposed model performs comparable to models with long context window and retrieval-augmented generation method in three distinct tasks .
Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning? (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current temporal reasoning datasets are limited to questions about single or isolated events, falling short in mirroring the realistic temporal characteristics involving concurrent nature and intricate temporal interconnections.
Approach: They propose a co-temporal Question Answering benchmark that contains four co-time scenarios with 4,748 samples for evaluating the co-timing abilities of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show that current LLMs struggle on CoTempQA tasks even when enhanced with Chain of Thought methodologies.
MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have shown nearly saturated performance on many NLP tasks.
Approach: They construct multiple sensitive factors time QA which encompasses three temporal factors . they test current mainstream LLMs with different parameter sizes .
Outcome: The proposed model incorporates three temporal factors with 2,853 samples . the results show that LLMs fall behind smaller models on these factors .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations