Challenge: Existing methods for code execution reasoning are limited by the difficulty of the training data.
Approach: They propose a model that uses reinforcement learning to reward correct answers from execution traces.
Outcome: The proposed model improves pass@1 by up to 5.9% on code generation tasks over strong baselines.

Similar Papers

CODERL+: Improving Code Generation via Reinforcement with Execution Semantics Alignment (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models excel at code generation by learning from vast code corpora, but a fundamental semantic gap remains between training on textual patterns and the goal of functional correctness . reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) approaches are inefficient for establishing a well-aligned connection between the textual representation of code and its execution semantics.
Approach: They propose a novel approach that integrates execution semantics alignment into the RLVR training pipeline for code generation.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms baseline training and RLVR and shows strong applicability across RL and LLMs.
Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been effective on structured tasks, but its reliance on simple, rule-based verifiers creates a bottleneck.
Approach: They propose a framework that uses a generative verifier to provide soft, probabilistic rewards.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing models up to 10x their size and can be scalable and effective.
StepCoder: Improving Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Compiler Feedback (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality but the long code generated by LLMs makes RL exploration ineffective.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning and compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks and integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to improve code generation quality.
Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has shown that large language models can be substantially improved using outcome-level verification signals.
Approach: They propose a framework where intermediate reasoning steps are checked by deterministic, rule-based verifiers.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves 20% higher F1 than state-of-the-art models and 6.5% higher than verifiable outcome rewards, with substantial gains in evidence grounding and logical coherence.
Integrating Symbolic Execution into the Fine-Tuning of Code-Generating LLMs (2025.naacl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs) have become essential tools in modern software development, enhancing productivity and accelerating development.
Approach: They propose to use Reinforcement Learning and Direct Preference Optimization to fine-tune code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs) by enhancing the training data with symbolic execution techniques.
Outcome: The proposed model improves on the CodeRL benchmark and shows that it is more accurate and objective than the baseline model.
CodeTool: Enhancing Programmatic Tool Invocation of LLMs via Process Supervision (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to tool invocation are often unnecessarily long and require lengthy reasoning paths.
Approach: They propose a framework for stepwise code generation that improves LLM tool invocation . they incorporate two distinct process rewards: the On-the-spot and the Latent Reward .
Outcome: The proposed framework improves LLM tool invocation by leveraging the concise nature of code.
CodePRM: Execution Feedback-enhanced Process Reward Model for Code Generation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in code generation focus on optimizing the thought process, but lack effective process supervision, making it difficult to optimize the thoughts.
Approach: They propose a method that leverages the code execution feedback to build a code PRM by collecting a large dataset of thought traces and then training it to take both the reasoning process and code execution as input.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms baselines and strong LLMs in the inference stage.
DARL: Encouraging Diverse Answers for General Reasoning without Verifiers (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent efforts such as RLPR have extended RLVR to general domains, enabling training on broader datasets and achieving improvements over RL PR.
Approach: They propose a framework that encourages the generation of diverse answers within a controlled deviation range from the reference while preserving alignment with it.
Outcome: Extensive experiments on 13 benchmarks show that DARL surpasses RLPR in both reasoning accuracy and output diversity.
Verifying the Subjective: Structured Multilingual Rewards for Low-Resource Alignment (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Structured Multilingual Reward Modeling Framework extends Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to subjective and open-ended tasks.
Approach: They propose a framework that extends Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards to subjective and open-ended tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves reasoning capability and response quality on 7 tasks across 50 low-resource languages.
From General Reward to Targeted Reward: Improving Open-ended Long-context Generation Models (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current research on long-form context in Large Language Models (LLMs) focuses on understanding of long-contexts, but the open-ended Long Text Generation (Open-LTG) remains underexplored.
Approach: They propose a method that uses data synthesis and a reward signal to enhance model performance.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms GPT-4-Turbo and improves performance by 20% on the Open-LTG task.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations