Challenge: Existing methods for aggregating large-form outputs overlook the nuance of neutral information and suffer from the high computational cost of fine-grained decomposition.
Approach: They propose a UQ framework that uses NLI neutral probabilities as triggers to distinguish irrelevance from uncertainty, reducing computation costs.
Outcome: Experiments on BIO and LongFact show that the proposed framework reduces inference time by 60% compared to full atomic decomposition.

Similar Papers

SIMBA UQ: Similarity-Based Aggregation for Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) provides measures of uncertainty, such as an estimate of the confidence in an LLM’s generated output.
Approach: They propose a black-box approach where consistency is used as a proxy for confidence in a model's output.
Outcome: The proposed methods are primarily but not necessarily entirely black- box, with consistency between output and other sampled generations used as a proxy for confidence in its correctness.
LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing research on Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) predominantly targets short text generation, however, real-world applications often necessitate much longer responses.
Approach: They propose a method that ensembles responses from multiple models and selects the response with the lowest uncertainty.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baseline methods in correlating with the model’s factuality scores (negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro).
IUQ: Interrogative Uncertainty Quantification for Long-Form Large Language Model Generation (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent approaches to quantify uncertainty in LLMs produce short or constrained answer sets, but many real-world applications require long-form and free-form text generation.
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages inter-sample consistency and intra-sampled faithfulness to quantify the uncertainty in long-form LLM outputs.
Outcome: The proposed framework provides reliable measures of claim-level uncertainty and the model’s faithfulness over two widely used long-form generation datasets.
Token-Level Density-Based Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Eliciting Truthfulness of Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a prominent approach for eliciting truthful answers from large language models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose to use a well-established method for text generation to extract token embeddings from multiple layers of LLMs and compute MD scores for each token.
Outcome: The proposed method improves on existing methods and provides accurate and computationally efficient uncertainty scores for sequence-level selective generation and claim-level fact-checking tasks.
Efficient Latent Semantic Clustering for Scaling Test-Time Computation of LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for scaling test-time computation rely on external models that introduce substantial computational overhead and fail to capture context-aware semantics.
Approach: They propose a method that leverages the generator LLM’s internal hidden states for clustering, eliminating the need for external models.
Outcome: The proposed method improves the computational efficiency of test-time scaling while maintaining or exceeding the performance of existing methods.
Semantic Token Clustering for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have limited truthfulness and tendency toward overconfidence constrain reliability in factual tasks.
Approach: They propose an efficient method that leverages semantic information encoded in LLMs to quantify uncertainty.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves comparable performance to baselines while significantly reducing computational overhead.
Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models (2025.acl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) produce hallucinations, which undermine user trust and reliability.
Approach: This tutorial offers the first systematic introduction to uncertainty quantification (UQ) for LLMs in text generation tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework provides tools for communicating the reliability of a model answer.
SPUQ: Perturbation-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models (2024.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have a tendency to make confidently wrong predictions, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification (UQ) . previous studies focused on aleatoric uncertainty, but the full spectrum of uncertainties, including epistemic, remains inadequately explored.
Approach: They propose a method to quantify uncertainty in large language models (LLMs) they use a set of perturbations and an aggregation module to generalize the method.
Outcome: The proposed method improves model uncertainty calibration and reduces expected calibration error by 50% on average.
Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models through Multiple Uncertainty Sources (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for uncertainty quantification fail to capture multifaceted nature of natural language generation.
Approach: They propose a multi-resource Uncertainty Quantification framework that integrates heterogeneous uncertainty signals into a unified measure.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on CoQA, NQ_Open, and HotpotQA.
Clustered Self-Assessment: A Simple yet Effective Method for Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for uncertainty quantification in large language models rely on indirect signals, such as entropy across sampled generations, which can be difficult to interpret and do not fully leverage the model’s ability to assess its own uncertainty.
Approach: They propose a method that groups sampled generations into semantically distinct clusters and uses the probability assigned by the LLM to each option as a confidence estimate.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baseline methods and achieves competitive performance with as few as two additional samples.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations