ChessArena: A Chess Testbed for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on isolated question-answering tasks that may not capture the essential aspects of strategic reasoning. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 13 large language models across over 800 games in chess . they use a chessian-based framework to test strategic reasoning and pattern recognition . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance and basic understanding of large language models. |
Similar Papers
Explore the Reasoning Capability of LLMs in the Chess Testbed (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that large language models struggle with long-term, complex reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate annotated strategy and tactic into large language models to improve reasoning capability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better than GPT, Claude, and Gemini models . it integrates annotated strategy and tactic into the model . |
LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environments (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating large language models use static datasets, leading to data leakage or overlooking the complexities of multi-agent interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that evaluates the diverse capabilities of LLM agents in multi-agent dynamic environments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses the diverse capabilities of LLM agents in multi-agent dynamic environments. |
RuleArena: A Benchmark for Rule-Guided Reasoning with LLMs in Real-World Scenarios (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | RuleArena assesses the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex, real-world rules in reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex, real-world rules in reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers airline baggage fees, NBA transactions, and tax regulations. |
LLMsPark: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Strategic Gaming Contexts (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly important for their intelligence evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a game theory-based evaluation platform that measures LLMs’ decision-making strategies and social behaviors in classic game-theoretic settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system cross-evaluates 15 leading LLMs using leaderboard rankings and scoring mechanisms. |
GuessArena: Guess Who I Am? A Self-Adaptive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Domain-Specific Knowledge and Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for large language models rely on static benchmarks and standardized evaluation protocols. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive evaluation framework that integrates dynamic domain knowledge modeling with progressive reasoning assessment to improve evaluation fidelity. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the framework distinguishes LLMs in terms of domain knowledge coverage and reasoning chain completeness. |
How Far Can LLMs Improve from Experience? Measuring Test-Time Learning Ability in LLMs with Human Comparison (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks primarily assess static knowledge, while intelligence also entails the ability to rapidly learn from experience. |
| Approach: | They propose to use semantic games to evaluate test-time learning . they recruit eight human participants to complete the same task . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares model performance under limited and cumulative experience settings and contains four forms of experience representation. |
PlanningArena: A Modular Benchmark for Multidimensional Evaluation of Planning and Tool Learning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that LLMs can be significantly improved by integrating external tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates external tools into large language models to evaluate their ability to generate action plans. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the ability of large language models to generate action plans and generate action plan templates. |
Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their logical reasoning abilities across various domains. |
| Approach: | They propose to divide puzzles into rule-based and rule-less categories and critically assess LLMs' performance through various methodologies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models have demonstrated capabilities in deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning, but they face limitations in inductive thinking. |
CodeArena: A Collective Evaluation Platform for LLM Code Generation (2025.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Mingzhe Du, Anh Tuan Luu, Bin Ji, Xiaobao Wu, Yuhao Qing, Dong Huang, Terry Yue Zhuo, Qian Liu, See-Kiong Ng
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have reshaped code generation, but persistent challenges impede accurate assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose an online evaluation framework tailored for large language models to assess their coding capabilities. |
| Outcome: | a new evaluation framework for large language models (LLMs) provides unbiased, unbiased evaluations and open access to solutions and test cases. |
ResearchArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel across many natural language processing tasks but face challenges in domain-specific, analytical tasks such as conducting research surveys. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in conducting research surveys. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is designed to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in conducting research surveys. |