METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks evaluate contextual causal reasoning in fragmented settings, failing to ensure context consistency or cover the full causal hierarchy. |
| Approach: | They use a unified context to benchmark large language models' contextual causal reasoning skills. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that LLMs are susceptible to distraction by irrelevant but factually correct information at lower level of causality. |
Similar Papers
CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large vision-language models have shown impressive ability in various language tasks, especially with their emergent in-context learning capability. |
| Approach: | They propose a causal reasoning benchmark for multi-modal in-context learning from large vision-language models that incorporates visual inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on three visual causal reasoning tasks and demonstrates their strengths and weaknesses. |
Large Language Models and Causal Inference in Collaboration: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyu Liu, Paiheng Xu, Junda Wu, Jiaxin Yuan, Yifan Yang, Yuhang Zhou, Fuxiao Liu, Tianrui Guan, Haoliang Wang, Tong Yu, Julian McAuley, Wei Ai, Furong Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential to enhance Natural Language Processing (NLP) models in areas such as predictive accuracy, fairness, robustness, and explainability. |
| Approach: | They evaluate or improve generative Large Language Models from a causal perspective in areas such as reasoning capacity, fairness and safety issues, explainability, and handling multimodality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to perform causal relationship discovery and causal effect estimation tasks. |
Causal Inference with Large Language Model: A Survey (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing causal inference frameworks do not match human judgment in several key areas, such as domain knowledge, logical inference, and cultural context. |
| Approach: | They propose to apply large language models to causal inference tasks . they summarize the main causal problems and approaches and compare their results . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are compared with traditional methods in healthcare, finance, and economics. |
CausalGraph2LLM: Evaluating LLMs for Causal Queries (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened up new avenues for their use beyond standard Natural Language Processing tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) they use over 700k queries to compare their encoding capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compared LLMs on graph-level and node-level queries and open-sourced and closed models. |
MDC-Bench: A Multidisciplinary Causal Benchmark Based on Causal Structures for Evaluating Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Peng Wang, Yuxiong Yan, Xiao Ding, Kai Xiong, Bibo Cai, Chao Peng, Yutai Hou, Dandan Tu, Bing Qin, Ting Liu
| Challenge: | Existing causal datasets focus on the commonsense domain, but LLMs perform poorly when answering complex questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a multidisciplinary causal evaluation benchmark to assess LLMs' knowledge and skills. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves in domain specialization, structural diversity, and task complexity. |
NoisyCausal: A Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Under Structured Noise (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on clean, abstract scenarios where causal structure is simple or implicitly assumed. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate causal reasoning under structured noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms standard prompting and reasoning baselines on NoisyCausal. |
CausalEval: Towards Better Causal Reasoning in Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Longxuan Yu, Delin Chen, Siheng Xiong, Qingyang Wu, Dawei Li, Zhikai Chen, Xiaoze Liu, Liangming Pan
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have been used for a variety of tasks, including problem-solving, decision-making, and understanding of the world. |
| Approach: | They propose a review of existing methods aimed at enhancing LMs for causal reasoning . they categorize existing methods as reasoning engines or as helpers providing knowledge or data to traditional methods . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods perform better than existing methods on a range of tasks. |
On the Reliability of Large Language Models for Causal Discovery (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing statistical methods to identify causal relationships from observational data remain elusive. |
| Approach: | They examine the impact of memorization for accurate causal relation prediction, the influence of incorrect causal relations in pre-training data and the contextual nuances that influence LLMs’ understanding of causal relations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are effective in recognizing causal relations that occur frequently in pre-training data, but their ability to generalize to new or rare causal relations is limited. |
CausalGraphBench: a Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models capabilities of Causal Graph discovery (2025.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have expanded their applications into domains not traditionally associated with natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of large language models to construct Causal Graphs (CGs) they examine various methods for CG discovery and their performance across different graph sizes and complexity levels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark comprises 35 CGs sourced from publicly available repositories and academic papers. |
Multi-component Causal Tracing in Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are prone to various forms of safety risks, such as learning and propagating societal biases and even creating harmful or deceptive content through jailbreak attacks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for causally tracing multiple components simultaneously that systematically identifies the subsets of components most critical to a desired performance metric. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods in identifying components critical to a desired performance metric. |