Related Knowledge Perturbation Matters: Rethinking Multiple Pieces of Knowledge Editing in Same-Subject (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
Zenghao Duan, Wenbin Duan, Zhiyi Yin, Yinghan Shen, Shaoling Jing, Jie Zhang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods struggle when tasked with editing multiple related knowledge pieces for the same subject. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the effectiveness of knowledge editing methods . they use same-subject edits to ensure comprehensive updates to entity-centric knowledge . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method over-relys on subject information, neglecting other critical factors, resulting in reduced editing effectiveness. |
Similar Papers
Can We Edit LLMs for Long-Tail Biomedical Knowledge? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods can enhance LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, but their performance on high-frequency popular knowledge remains inferior to that on high frequency popular knowledge. |
| Approach: | They conduct the first comprehensive study to investigate the effectiveness of knowledge editing methods for editing long-tail biomedical knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, but their performance on high-frequency popular knowledge remains inferior even after editing. |
MEMIT-Merge: Addressing MEMIT’s Key-Value Conflicts in Same-Subject Batch Editing for LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing techniques that modify models’ internal knowledge without full model retraining have gained significant attention. |
| Approach: | They propose an enhanced approach that merges value computation processes for facts sharing the same subject to improve editing efficiency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method maintains a 98% editing success rate on same-subject and distinct-sub subject datasets while the original success rate drops to 46%. |
Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique for updating factual knowledge in large language models (LLMs) but studies have identified side effects such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities that have emerged after editing. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the side effects of knowledge editing in large language models using metrics and benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The results of the study highlight the limitations of current knowledge editing methods and outline potential research directions. |
RelEdit: Evaluating Conceptual Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Relational Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods struggle to reason about related conceptual knowledge effectively, despite a lack of model-level relational reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess concept-level and instance-level relational reasoning abilities of edited models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model obtains the best scores on the memory-based in-context editing baseline, MICE, suggesting a promising direction for model editing. |
Resolving UnderEdit & OverEdit with Iterative & Neighbor-Assisted Model Editing (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to update model parameters are limited due to their low efficiency and cost. |
| Approach: | They propose two methods to improve model editing performance by incorporating neighboring knowledge during editing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods reduce UnderEdit by 38 percentage points and OverEdit by up to 6 . |
MLaKE: Multilingual Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on knowledge editing focus on monolingual scenarios, neglecting the complexities presented by multilingual contexts and multi-hop reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the adaptability of multilingual knowledge editing methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the adaptability of multilingual knowledge editing methods across five languages. |
Can We Continually Edit Language Models? On the Knowledge Attenuation in Sequential Model Editing (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for model editing suffer from knowledge attenuation due to redundant parameters interference and update weight disentanglement. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to mitigate the problem of knowledge attenuation in sequential editing by analyzing redundant parameters interference and update weight disentanglement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method mitigates the knowledge attenuation issue and improves on existing benchmarks. |
Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique to adapt large language models to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual dataset to translate a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset from English to Chinese and then to evaluate their performance in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can change model performance on several special cases without retraining from scratch. |
Detecting Edit Failures In Large Language Models: An Improved Specificity Benchmark (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent model editing techniques can introduce large unwanted side effects, a new study shows . existing specificity benchmarks do not detect these unwanted side-effects . a recent study shows that model edits can cause significant performance drop . |
| Approach: | They extend existing CounterFact benchmark to include a dynamic component and propose a new benchmark to evaluate model editing techniques. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark improves existing benchmarks for specificity and avoids unwanted side effects. |
MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for retraining from scratch are limited and only work on the recall of edited facts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark method that allows users to ask multi-hop questions to assess whether edited models correctly answer questions where the answer should change as an entailed consequence of edited facts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing models and scales well with LLMs (up to 175B) it is based on a memory-based approach that stores all edited facts externally while prompting the language model iteratively to generate answers consistent with the edited facts. |