Challenge: Prior work has focused on using large language models to simulate human behaviors . but, LLMs are known to generate erroneous, stereotypical, or overconfident answers .
Approach: They propose to specialize large language models for simulating survey response distributions by first-token probabilities.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms other methods and zero-shot classifiers on unseen questions, countries, and a completely unseened survey.

Similar Papers

Language Model Fine-Tuning on Scaled Survey Data for Predicting Distributions of Public Opinions (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior studies have failed to accurately predict distribution of survey responses from human subjects.
Approach: They propose to fine-tune large language models to predict human response distributions by leveraging unique structural characteristics of survey data.
Outcome: The proposed model can capture group-specific variability in public opinions, generalizing to unseen subpopulations, survey waves and question topics, and different survey families.
Valid Survey Simulations with Limited Human Data: The Roles of Prompting, Fine-Tuning, and Rectification (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are a cost-effective and time-consuming way to capture public opinion and behavior, but their outputs are often biased and yield invalid estimates.
Approach: They propose to use large language models to generate survey responses and rectification methods that debias population estimates to find out how human responses are best allocated between them.
Outcome: The proposed methods reduce bias below 5% and increase sample size by up to 14% under a fixed budget.
SocioBench: Modeling Human Behavior in Sociological Surveys with Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) lack large-scale, systematically constructed benchmarks for evaluating their alignment with real-world social attitudes.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to assess LLMs' alignment with real-world social attitudes . they find LLM models achieve only 30–40% accuracy when simulating individuals .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark shows that LLMs achieve only 30% accuracy when simulating individuals in complex survey scenarios.
Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies focus on generating closed-ended survey responses with large language models, whereas LLMs are typically trained to generate open-ended text.
Approach: They evaluate the impact of various Survey Response Generation Methods on simulated responses by generating closed-ended responses from large language models.
Outcome: The proposed methods perform best in individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment.
Missing the Margins: A Systematic Literature Review on the Demographic Representativeness of LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: 211 studies on the demographic representativeness of large language models have conflicting results . 29% of the studies report positive conclusions on the representativeness, 30% do not evaluate LLMs across multiple demographic categories or within demographic subcategories.
Approach: 211 papers review the representativeness of large language models . authors recommend more precise evaluation methods and comprehensive documentation of demographic attributes .
Outcome: 211 studies on the representativeness of large language models are reviewed . 29% of the studies report positive conclusions, but 30% fail to specify subcategories . authors recommend more precise evaluation methods and documentation of demographic attributes .
A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks in various domains, but they can be unreliable due to factual errors in their generations.
Approach: They summarize recent advances in LLM confidence estimation and calibration and outline their main lessons learned.
Outcome: The proposed methods can be used to assess the reliability of models and to calibrate them across tasks.
Large Language Models for Generative Recommendation: A Survey and Visionary Discussions (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing but are not fully able to leverage the generative power of LLM.
Approach: They examine the progress, methods, and future directions of large language models . they examine what generative recommendation is, why RS should advance to generative recommendations .
Outcome: The proposed approach can be simplified to generate recommendations from the entire pool of items.
A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation Methods on Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities but could produce biased, hallucinated, or non-factual responses.
Approach: They propose to conduct extensive experimental evaluations of LLM uncertainty estimation methods . large language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across tasks .
Outcome: The proposed method could produce biased, hallucinated, or non-factual responses . a lack of comprehensive surveys on LLM uncertainty estimation is a problem .
Large Language Models Are Bad Dice Players: LLMs Struggle to Generate Random Numbers from Statistical Distributions (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing large language models lack a functional internal sampler to faithfully sample from specified probability distributions . lack of robust sampling mechanisms across diverse application scenarios is a critical functional requirement .
Approach: They propose to use a dual-protocol design to disentangle failure modes . batch generation achieves only modest statistical validity, while independent requests collapse almost entirely .
Outcome: The proposed model fails to enforce uniform answer-position constraints and violates demographic targets in attribute-constrained text-to-image prompt synthesis.
Do LLMs Play Dice? Exploring Probability Distribution Sampling in Large Language Models for Behavioral Simulation (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: LLMs are used to emulate sequential decision-making processes of humans . however, their ability to perform probabilistic sampling is limited .
Approach: They propose to use large language models (LLMs) as agents to emulate the sequential decision-making processes of humans represented as Markov decision-makers (MDPs).
Outcome: The proposed models can understand probabilities, but struggle with sampling precision . integrating coding tools can improve sampling precision, but this level of sampling precision still makes it difficult to simulate human behavior as agents.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations