Challenge: Existing studies have shown that relying on LLMs as information providers may hurt student learning.
Approach: They introduce and apply two bias score metrics to evaluate LLMs for bias in the personalized educational setting, specifically on the models’ roles as “teachers.”
Outcome: The proposed models harm student learning by perpetuating harmful stereotypes and reversing them.

Similar Papers

Confronting LLMs with Traditional ML: Rethinking the Fairness of Large Language Models in Tabular Classifications (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies suggest using large language models to make tabular classifications . however, LLMs have been shown to exhibit harmful social biases based on stereotypes and inequalities present in society.
Approach: They propose to use large language models to make tabular classifications . they show that LLMs inherit biases from their training data .
Outcome: The proposed models exhibit harmful biases that reflect stereotypes and inequalities in society.
Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models exhibit undesirable preference toward predicting certain answers over others, despite their adaptability to diverse tasks.
Approach: They propose a label bias calibration method that outperforms recent calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias.
Investigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human Perception (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Detecting media bias is critical due to the spread of misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms.
Approach: They investigate the presence and nature of bias within large language models and its consequential impact on media bias detection.
Outcome: The proposed debiasing strategies include prompt engineering and model fine-tuning.
A Comparative Study of Explicit and Implicit Gender Biases in Large Language Models via Self-evaluation (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on the explicit and implicit biases in large language models (LLMs) focus on either explicit or implicit bias.
Approach: They propose a self-evaluation-based two-stage measurement of explicit and implicit biases within large language models grounded in social psychology.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on two stages of self-evaluation on state-of-the-art LLMs to measure explicit bias toward social targets, where bias is less likely to be self-recognized by the LLM.
Evaluating Bias in LLMs for Job-Resume Matching: Gender, Race, and Education (2025.naacl-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have potential to automate hiring but inherent biases may lead to unfair hiring practices.
Approach: They evaluate how factors such as gender, race, and educational background influence model decisions.
Outcome: The proposed model reduces biases related to gender and race, but implicit biase concerning educational background remains significant.
Explicit vs. Implicit: Investigating Social Bias in Large Language Models through Self-Reflection (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to quantify and quantify social biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) focus on explicit bias, with little attention to implicit bias.
Approach: They propose a self-reflection-based evaluation framework that measures implicit bias and evaluates explicit bias by prompting LLMs to analyze their own generated content.
Outcome: The proposed framework compares explicit and implicit biases in large language models . it demonstrates that explicit bias manifests as mild stereotypes, while implicit bias exhibits strong stereotypes.
Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-Making (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found that biased LLMs can influence decisions in areas such as medical classifications and educational hiring.
Approach: They conducted two interactive experiments on partisan bias in large language models while completing tasks with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model.
Outcome: The results show that prior knowledge of AI is weakly correlated with a reduction of the bias, suggesting that AI education can be crucial for mitigating bias effects.
LLMs Are Biased Towards Output Formats! Systematically Evaluating and Mitigating Output Format Bias of LLMs (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using format-following capabilities, state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) can be leveraged to tailor outputs to specific task formats.
Approach: They propose to define a format bias evaluation metric and establish effective strategies to reduce it.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation reduces the variance in ChatGPT’s performance among wrapping formats from 235.33 to 0.71 (%2)
Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Bias (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Proprietary models such as GPT-4, Claude, Gemini-Pro and others are being democratized to improve evaluations of LLMs.
Approach: They propose a framework that is free from referencing groundtruth annotations for investigating **Misinformation Oversight Bias**, **Gender Bia**,**Authority Bia* and **Beauty Bia's** on LLM and human judges.
Outcome: The proposed framework investigates **Misinformation Oversight Bias**, **Gender Bia**,**Authority Bia* and **Beauty Bia' on LLM and human judges.
Characterizing Positional Bias in Large Language Models: A Multi-Model Evaluation of Prompt Order Effects (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models can be influenced by various forms of biases, says a new study . positional bias affects how LLMs interpret and weigh information, the authors say .
Approach: a new study examines the impact of positional bias on large language models . positional biased models prioritize items based on their position rather than content or quality .
Outcome: a new study shows that LLMs prioritize items based on their position rather than content or quality . the positional bias affects how LLM interpret and weigh information, the authors say .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations