| Challenge: | a recent study shows that reward models overfit on superficial features, hindering generalization performance . prevailing approach to training preference-based reward models presents several challenges . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses synthetic natural language critiques to provide additional feedback to large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves performance and data efficiency of RMs initialized from different pretrained models, reducing the reliance on costly human annotations. |
Similar Papers
Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yue Yu, Zhengxing Chen, Aston Zhang, Liang Tan, Chenguang Zhu, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Yundi Qian, Xuewei Wang, Suchin Gururangan, Chao Zhang, Melanie Kambadur, Dhruv Mahajan, Rui Hou
| Challenge: | Existing reward models produce scalar scores and struggle to incorporate critiques in a natural language format. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that predicts critiques and rewards using self-generated critiques without extra supervision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reward modeling accuracy by 3.7%-7.3% compared to standard reward models and LLM judges. |
Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Dense Rewards from Language Model Critic (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) can align language models with non-differentiable reward signals, such as human preferences, but the sparsity of these signals can lead to inefficient and unstable learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that utilizes the critique capability of Large Language Models to produce intermediate-step rewards during RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves sample efficiency and the overall performance of the policy model, supported by both automatic and human evaluation. |
Aligning Large Language Models through Synthetic Feedback (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, alignment learning requires significant human demonstrations and feedback from proprietary LLMs such as ChatGPT. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses synthetic feedback to align large language models to human values without extensive human annotations and proprietary LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models on human-annotated demonstrations in alignment benchmarks. |
Navigating Noisy Feedback: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Error-Prone Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Muhan Lin, Shuyang Shi, Yue Guo, Behdad Chalaki, Vaishnav Tadiparthi, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Katia Sycara
| Challenge: | Reward hacking is a problem in reinforcement learning where the ability to specify the desired behavior of a reward function is difficult. |
| Approach: | They propose to use feedback as a potential-based shaping function to solicit and apply feedback from large language models to improve convergence speed and policy returns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves convergence speed and policy returns over baselines even with significant ranking errors and eliminates the need for complex post-processing of reward functions. |
RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Nathan Lambert, Valentina Pyatkin, Jacob Morrison, Lester James Validad Miranda, Bill Yuchen Lin, Khyathi Chandu, Nouha Dziri, Sachin Kumar, Tom Zick, Yejin Choi, Noah A. Smith, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
| Challenge: | Evaluating reward models presents an opportunity to understand the opaque technologies used for alignment of language models. |
| Approach: | They present a benchmark dataset and code-base for evaluation of reward models . they use prompt-chosen-rejected trios to benchmark how they perform on queries . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset compares RMs with other models on a set of questions. |
A Systematic Analysis of Base Model Choice for Reward Modeling (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and reward modeling are key to training powerful large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to combine RLHF and reward modeling to boost model selection . they also demonstrate that a small set of benchmarks could be combined to boost the model selection. |
| Outcome: | The results show that the model selection can be improved by up to 14% compared to the most common (default) choice. |
Prototypical Reward Network for Data-Efficient Model Alignment (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a reward model that fine-tunes Large Language Models (LLMs) by utilizing Prototypical Networks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework utilizing Prototypical Networks to enhance reward models under limited human feedback, enabling more stable and reliable structural learning from fewer samples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reward models under limited human feedback, surpassing traditional methods, especially in data-limited scenarios. |
Semi-Supervised Reward Modeling via Iterative Self-Training (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reward models capture values and preferences of humans and are used in Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) Traditionally, training large language models relies on extensive human-annotated preference data, which poses significant challenges in terms of scalability and cost. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that enhances RM training using unlabeled data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves reward models without incurring additional labeling costs on unlabeled datasets. |
Training Language Model to Critique for Better Refinement (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tianshu Yu, Chao Xiang, Mingchuan Yang, Pei Ke, Bosi Wen, Cunxiang Wang, Jiale Cheng, Li Zhang, Xinyu Mu, Chuxiong Sun, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have remarkable evaluation and critique capabilities, providing insightful feedback and identifying flaws in various tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to train critic models using refinement signals to generate feedback loops where critiques guide the model in refining its responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms traditional methods and open-source models in terms of critique quality and refinement outcomes. |
Igniting Creative Writing in Small Language Models: LLM-as-a-Judge versus Multi-Agent Refined Rewards (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with novelty and Reinforcement Learning from human feedback (RLHF) is costly. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Reward Model (RM) and a principle-guided LLM-as-a-Judge to enhance creative output over baselines. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach significantly enhances creative output over baselines, but the principle-guided LLM-as-a-Judge yields superior generation quality. |