Are Economists Always More Introverted? Analyzing Consistency in Persona-Assigned LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personalized Large Language Models are increasingly used in diverse applications . prior research examined how well LLMs adhere to predefined personas in writing style . inconsistent responses are influenced by multiple factors, including the assigned persona, stereotypes, and model design choices. |
| Approach: | They propose a standardized framework to analyze consistency in persona-assigned LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates personas across multiple tasks and runs. |
Similar Papers
An Empirical Analysis of the Writing Styles of Persona-Assigned LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts to "personalize" large language models by assigning them specific personas are limited by current knowledge of how well they perform. |
| Approach: | They use a style embedding model to analyze writing styles of persona-assigned LLMs . they find significant style differences between personas using Kullback-Leibler divergence . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows significant differences in writing styles among personas across socio-demographic groups. |
Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Pranav Bhandari, Nicolas Fay, Michael J Wise, Amitava Datta, Stephanie Meek, Usman Naseem, Mehwish Nasim
| Challenge: | Large language models are often subjected to context-shifting behaviour, resulting in a lack of consistent and interpretable personality-aligned interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use two conversation agents to generate a discourse with an assigned personality from the OCEAN framework and then use multiple judge agents to infer original traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on two conversation agents with a personality assigned from the OCEAN framework and then multiple judge agents to infer the original traits assigned. |
Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometrics (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Seungbeen Lee, Seungwon Lim, Seungju Han, Giyeong Oh, Hyungjoo Chae, Jiwan Chung, Minju Kim, Beong-woo Kwak, Yeonsoo Lee, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo, Youngjae Yu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adaptation as conversational agents. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark that uses 8K multi-choice questions to assess the personality of Large Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed personality test outperforms existing personality tests for LLMs in reliability and validity. |
Aligning Language Models to User Opinions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personality is a defining feature of human beings, shaped by a complex interplay of demographic characteristics, moral principles, and social experiences. |
| Approach: | They use public opinion surveys to model past user opinions in addition to user demographics and ideology to achieve up to 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from survey questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from public opinion surveys across a broad set of topics. |
Spotting Out-of-Character Behavior: Atomic-Level Evaluation of Persona Fidelity in Open-Ended Generation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods struggle to capture subtle inconsistencies in large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose an atomic-level evaluation framework that quantifies persona fidelity at a finer granularity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework detects inconsistencies that prior evaluation methods overlook . it captures subtle deviations that real users would encounter . |
PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Vinay Samuel, Henry Peng Zou, Yue Zhou, Shreyas Chaudhari, Ashwin Kalyan, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ameet Deshpande, Karthik R Narasimhan, Vishvak Murahari
| Challenge: | Persona agents are LLM agents conditioned to act according to an assigned persona . evaluating how faithfully these agents adhere to their personas remains a challenge . |
| Approach: | a new study evaluates persona agents' ability to act according to an assigned persona . a persona agent's person score is a human-aligned automatic metric that can be used to evaluate a model . |
| Outcome: | a new evaluation framework and a human-aligned automatic metric show that persona agents can perform better. |
Modeling, Evaluating, and Embodying Personality in LLMs: A Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Iago Alves Brito, Julia Soares Dollis, Fernanda Bufon Färber, Pedro Schindler Freire Brasil Ribeiro, Rafael Teixeira Sousa, Arlindo Rodrigues Galvão Filho
| Challenge: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Approach: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy analyzes the limitations of existing methods and identifies key research gaps. |
Enhancing Persona Consistency for LLMs’ Role-Playing using Persona-Aware Contrastive Learning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for analyzing and analyzing large language models (LLMs) lack of emotion and fine-grained role awareness limits the model’s ability to provide personalized and diverse interactions further. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation-free framework to align LLMs’ behavior during role-playing, enhancing the model’s role consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms vanilla LLMs under automatic evaluation methods and human expert evaluation. |
SCORE: Systematic COnsistency and Robustness Evaluation for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Typical evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) report a single accuracy metric per dataset, often derived from an optimized setup. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for non-adversarial evaluation of large language models that evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups to give a realistic estimate of their accuracy and consistency. |
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality traits, but there is limited research on whether they consistently reflect specific personality traits. |
| Approach: | They propose to study the behavior of LLM-based agents which they refer to as LLM personas and simulate them to measure their personality traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on the Big Five personality model and has been validated by human evaluations and automatic evaluations. |