Enhancing Recommendation Explanations through User-Centric Refinement (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing explanations for user reviews often fail to meet user-centric aspects, reducing their usefulness to users. |
| Approach: | They propose a paradigm that refines initial explanations generated by existing models during the inference stage to enhance their quality in multiple aspects. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves explanations generated by existing models during the inference stage to enhance their quality in multiple aspects. |
Similar Papers
Cross-Refine: Improving Natural Language Explanation Generation by Learning in Tandem (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Natural language explanations (NLEs) are vital for elucidating the reasoning behind large language model (LLM) decisions. |
| Approach: | They propose a role-modeling approach that employs two LLMs as generator and critic to generate and refine NLEs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms self-refine and can perform with less powerful LLMs. |
XRec: Large Language Models for Explainable Recommendation (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Collaborative filtering (CF) is a widely adopted approach, but lacks the ability to provide explanations for the recommended items. |
| Approach: | They propose a model-agnostic framework that enables large language models to provide comprehensive explanations for user behaviors in recommender systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline approaches in explainable recommender systems. |
ReasoningRec: Bridging Personalized Recommendations and Human-Interpretable Explanations through LLM Reasoning (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical evaluations demonstrate that ReasoningRec surpasses state-of-the-art methods by up to 12.5% in recommendation prediction while simultaneously providing human-intelligible explanations. |
| Approach: | They propose a reasoning-based recommendation framework that leverages Large Language Models to model users and items, focusing on preferences, aversions, and explanatory reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses state-of-the-art methods by up to 12.5% in recommendation prediction while providing human-intelligible explanations. |
Beyond Persuasion: Towards Conversational Recommender System with Credible Explanations (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing CRSs can be highly persuasive, but they can be deceptive and can damage the long-term trust between users and the CRS. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to enhance the credibility of CRS’s explanations by using a set of credibility-aware persuasive strategies and a post-hoc self-reflection process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method enhances the credibility of CRS’s explanations and refines them via post-hoc self-reflection. |
Justifying Recommendations using Distantly-Labeled Reviews and Fine-Grained Aspects (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to generating reviews struggle to generate justifications that are relevant to users’ decision-making process. |
| Approach: | They propose an ‘extractive’ approach to identify review segments which justify users’ intentions and use it to distantly label massive review corpora and construct large-scale personalized recommendation justification datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate convincing and diverse justifications from massive review corpora and distantly label massive review data. |
A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and generation. |
| Approach: | They present a comprehensive synthesis of large language models and their applications . they dissect a four-module agent architecture and review representative designs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models address fundamental challenges in traditional recommender systems . they include limited comprehension of complex user intents, insufficient interaction capabilities . |
Enhancing Explainable Rating Prediction through Annotated Macro Concepts (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models learn user and item embeddings and generate reasons based on these embedds. |
| Approach: | They propose a concept-based explanation framework that leverages macro concepts to bridge the gap between the user/item embeddings and the recommendation reasons. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on three datasets prove the proposed model is superior to existing models. |
Enhancing Perception: Refining Explanations of News Claims with LLM Conversations (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) streamlines the task of crafting explanations for fake news . a study compared refinement conversations between human and LLMs to enhance the effectiveness of LLM explanations . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Large Language Models to streamline the task of crafting fake news explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the process of crafting explanations for fake news claims through conversational refinement. |
Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanations (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work has demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) can self-critique and refine their initial outputs, but this capability remains unexplored for improving explanation faithfulness. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enables models to improve the faithfulness of their own explanations through an iterative critique and refinement process without external supervision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces unfaithfulness rates in three datasets and four state-of-the-art LLMs by 36% compared to 54.81% for baseline. |
Improving Personalized Explanation Generation through Visualization (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing explainable recommendation models generate repetitive sentences for different items or empty sentences with insufficient details. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual-enhanced approach to generate rating scores and text explanations using visualization generation and text–image matching discrimination. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves both the text quality and the diversity and explainability of the generated explanations. |