Nine Ways to Break Copyright Law and Why Our LLM Won’t: A Fair Use Aligned Generation Framework (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Aakash Sen Sharma, Debdeep Sanyal, Priyansh Srivastava, Sundar Athreya H, Shirish Karande, Mohan Kankanhalli, Murari Mandal
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) often risk copyright infringement by reproducing protected content verbatim or with insufficient transformative modifications. |
| Approach: | They propose a legally-grounded framework to align LLM outputs with fair-use doctrine . LAW-LM uses a dataset containing 18,000 expert-validated examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework aligns outputs with fair-use doctrine and is validated by 18,000 experts. |
Similar Papers
SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text Generation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed machine learning but have raised significant legal concerns due to their potential to produce text that infringes on copyrights. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight, real-time defense mechanism to prevent the generation of copyrighted text by evaluating methods and testing attack strategies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed defense significantly reduces the volume of copyrighted text generated by LLMs by effectively refusing malicious requests. |
LLMs and Copyright Risks: Benchmarks and Mitigation Approaches (2025.naacl-tutorial)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, but their widespread use has raised significant copyright concerns. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide an overview of relevant copyright principles and their application to AI and examine specific copyright issues in LLM development and deployment. |
| Outcome: | The course will provide an overview of relevant copyright principles and their application to AI, followed by an examination of specific copyright issues in LLM development and deployment. |
Do LLMs Know to Respect Copyright Notice? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on the occurrence of copyright violations in LLM output, but a negative answer would suggest that LLMs will become the primary facilitator and accelerator of copy right infringement behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose to examine whether LLMs respect copyright information in user input . they use a set of language models, user prompts, and copyrighted materials . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be the primary facilitator and accelerator of copyright infringement behavior, the study finds . the study also provides a benchmark dataset serving as a test bed for evaluating infringement behaviors by LLMs . |
Copyright Violations and Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examines the extent to which language models can memorize training data . a fair use exemption to copyright laws allows for limited use of copyrighted material . |
| Approach: | They examine the extent to which language models can redistribute copyrighted text . they use a range of popular books and coding problems to study copyright violations . |
| Outcome: | This study examines the extent to which language models can redistribute copyrighted text . it shows that language models may memorize entire chunks of training data . |
LegalLens: Leveraging LLMs for Legal Violation Identification in Unstructured Text (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Dor Bernsohn, Gil Semo, Yaron Vazana, Gila Hayat, Ben Hagag, Joel Niklaus, Rohit Saha, Kyryl Truskovskyi
| Challenge: | a recent study focused on detecting legal violations within unstructured textual data . a similar study focused only on associating violations with potentially affected individuals . |
| Approach: | They constructed two datasets using Large Language Models (LLMs) they publicize the results to advance legal natural language processing research . |
| Outcome: | The proposed datasets and the code used for the experiments have been released to advance legal natural language processing (NLP) |
Certified Mitigation of Worst-Case LLM Copyright Infringement (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are trained on vast datasets that include copyrighted material or content with usage restrictions. |
| Approach: | They propose a "copyright takedown" method that provides certified copyright take down . they use a combination of inference-time and rewriting techniques to transform potentially infringing segments . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces infringement risk, preserves utility, and accommodates different levels of enforcement stringency with adaptive abstention. |
Confusion is the Final Barrier: Rethinking Jailbreak Evaluation and Investigating the Real Misuse Threat of LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yu Yan, Sheng Sun, Zhe Wang, Yijun Lin, Zenghao Duan, Zhifei Zheng, Min Liu, Zhiyi Yin, Jianping Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have been developed to deal with real-world crimes, but it remains unclear whether they internalize authentic knowledge or are forced to simulate toxic language patterns. |
| Approach: | They construct knowledge-intensive Q&A to investigate misuse threats of Large Language Models in terms of dangerous knowledge possession, harmful task planning utility, and harmfulness judgment robustness. |
| Outcome: | The findings raise concerns that jailbreak success is often attributable to a hallucination loop between jailbroken LLM and judger LLM . |
Web Intellectual Property at Risk: Preventing Unauthorized Real-Time Retrieval by Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new framework protects web content from unauthorized LLM real-time extraction and redistribution . multiple AI companies have been accused of scraping digital IP for proprietary benefit . |
| Approach: | They propose a defense framework that empowers web content creators to safeguard their web-based IP from unauthorized LLM real-time extraction and redistribution by leveraging the semantic understanding capability of LLMs themselves. |
| Outcome: | The proposed defense outperforms traditional defenses on LLMs and improves on black-box optimization problems. |
On the Vulnerability of Safety Alignment in Open-Access LLMs (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jingwei Yi, Rui Ye, Qisi Chen, Bin Zhu, Siheng Chen, Defu Lian, Guangzhong Sun, Xing Xie, Fangzhao Wu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to malicious exploitation, but are often rejected and limited harmfulness is limited. |
| Approach: | They propose two types of reverse alignment techniques: reverse supervised fine-tuning (RSFT) and reverse preference optimization (RPO). |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can significantly enhance the success rate and harmfulness of jailbreak attacks, but they face high rejection rates and limited harmfulness. |
Jailbreak Open-Sourced Large Language Models via Enforced Decoding (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hangfan Zhang, Zhimeng Guo, Huaisheng Zhu, Bochuan Cao, Lu Lin, Jinyuan Jia, Jinghui Chen, Dinghao Wu
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that Large Language Models can be misused to generate undesired content. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to manipulate the generation process to generate undesired content without heavy computations or prompt designs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that open-sourced large language models could be misused to generate undesired content without heavy computations or prompt designs. |