HATECAT-TR: A Hate Speech Span Detection and Categorization Dataset for Turkish (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new dataset of Turkish tweets contains 4465 hateful spans . each hateful post is directed at one of eight minority groups . |
| Approach: | They propose a span-annotated dataset of Turkish tweets containing 4465 hateful spans . each hateful spat is categorized into one of five discourse types . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset contains 4465 hateful spans across 2981 tweets . each span is categorized into one of five discourse types . |
Similar Papers
ViHOS: Hate Speech Spans Detection for Vietnamese (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Increasing use of social networking sites can cause problems for human moderators to review tagged comments. |
| Approach: | They present a dataset that contains 26k spans on 11k comments and detailed annotation guidelines . they also provide definitions of hateful and offensive spans in Vietnamese comments . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that it is difficult to detect specific types of spans in the dataset . the dataset is the first human-annotated corpus containing 26k spans on 11k comments . |
A Turkish Hate Speech Dataset and Detection System (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Davidson et al., 2017: hate speech is a discourse that targets a specific group based on race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, etc. |
| Approach: | They propose a machine learning system for automatic detection of hate speech in Turkish . they use a hate speech dataset and a dataset to collect tweets about immigrants . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is able to detect hate speech in Turkish and annotate it using BERTurk. |
So Hateful! Building a Multi-Label Hate Speech Annotated Arabic Dataset (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Social media enables widespread propagation of hate speech targeting groups based on ethnicity, religion, or other characteristics. |
| Approach: | They analyze 70,000 Arabic tweets to identify hate speech patterns and train models . 15% of tweets contain offensive language while 6% have hate speech . authors hope to prevent spread of hateful content on social media platforms . |
| Outcome: | The analysis of 70,000 Arabic tweets shows that 15% of tweets contain offensive language while 6% have hate speech . 10% of tweet provide verifiable factual claims, and 7% are deemed important . |
STATE ToxiCN: A Benchmark for Span-level Target-Aware Toxicity Extraction in Chinese Hate Speech Detection (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on Chinese hate speech detection lack span-level fine-grained annotations. |
| Approach: | They construct a Span-level target-aware Toxicity Extraction dataset and evaluate existing models for Chinese hateful slang. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is the first span-level Chinese hate speech dataset and evaluates the ability of existing models to understand hate semantics. |
HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twitter (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Manuel Tonneau, Diyi Liu, Niyati Malhotra, Scott A. Hale, Samuel Fraiberger, Victor Orozco-Olvera, Paul Röttger
| Challenge: | Prior work on automated hate speech detection models has been limited due to systematic biases in evaluation datasets and poor performance across geographies. |
| Approach: | They propose to construct a global hate speech dataset representative of social media settings from tweets posted on September 21, 2022. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset covers eight languages and four English-speaking countries and covers eight countries where English is the main language on Twitter. |
Data-Efficient Methods For Improving Hate Speech Detection (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for hate speech detection are data-hungry and require large datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose an input-level data augmentation technique EasyMix to improve hate speech detection in english and multilingual datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance across english and multilingual datasets by 1% and 2-8%. |
JL-Hate: An Annotated Dataset for Joint Learning of Hate Speech and Target Detection (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing data resources for the detection of hate speech focus on text sequence classification, but the target of hateful content is lacking. |
| Approach: | They propose a tweet dataset for the task of joint learning of hate speech detection and target detection called JL-Hate. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset performs similar tasks to the existing datasets in sequence and token classification tasks. |
Hatemoji: A Test Suite and Adversarially-Generated Dataset for Benchmarking and Detecting Emoji-Based Hate (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for detecting hate expressed with emojis have weaknesses when used for sensitive applications such as content moderation. |
| Approach: | They propose a test suite of 3,930 short-form statements that evaluates hateful language expressed with emoji. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on emoji-based hate while maintaining strong performance on text-only hate. |
Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Mai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi, Jordyn Seybolt, Munmun De Choudhury, Diyi Yang
| Challenge: | Existing studies on explicit or overt hate speech have failed to address a more pervasive form based on coded or indirect language. |
| Approach: | They propose a theoretically-justified taxonomy of implicit hate speech and a benchmark corpus with fine-grained labels for each message and its implication. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset will serve as a useful benchmark for understanding this multifaceted issue. |
An Italian Twitter Corpus of Hate Speech against Immigrants (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study has annotated 6,000 tweets for hate speech against immigrants . the annotation scheme was designed to account for the multiplicity of factors that can contribute to the definition of a hate speech notion . |
| Approach: | They describe a Twitter corpus annotated for hate speech against immigrants . they propose a scheme that includes aggressiveness, offensiveness, irony, stereotype and intensity . |
| Outcome: | The proposed annotation scheme includes aggressiveness, offensiveness, irony, stereotype, intensity and (on an experimental basis) intensity. |