PropXplain: Can LLMs Enable Explainable Propaganda Detection? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Maram Hasanain, Md Arid Hasan, Mohamed Bayan Kmainasi, Elisa Sartori, Ali Ezzat Shahroor, Giovanni Da San Martino, Firoj Alam
| Challenge: | Currently, propagandistic content detection studies focus on detection, with little attention given to explanations justifying the predicted label. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual explanation-enhanced dataset and an explanation-based LLM to address this issue. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs comparably while also generating explanations. |
Similar Papers
PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jiateng Liu, Lin Ai, Zizhou Liu, Payam Karisani, Zheng Hui, Yi Fung, Preslav Nakov, Julia Hirschberg, Heng Ji
| Challenge: | Existing research on propaganda detection does not capture the motives behind the content or its broader impact. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that dissects propaganda into techniques, arousal appeals, and underlying intent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance in a wide range of scenarios and can be used to identify and categorize propaganda techniques. |
MemeIntel: Explainable Detection of Propagandistic and Hateful Memes (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for label detection and explanation generation have been limited in understanding complex issues . identifying propaganda and hate in memes is essential for combating misinformation and minimizing harm . |
| Approach: | They propose an explanation-enhanced dataset for propaganda memes in Arabic and hateful memes on English to solve these tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the current state-of-the-art in label detection and explanation generation. |
Large Language Models for Propaganda Span Annotation (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using propagandistic techniques to manipulate online audiences is increasing in recent years. |
| Approach: | They investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 can extract propagandistic spans and the potential of employing them to collect more cost-effective annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model provides labels that have higher agreement with expert annotators and lead to specialized models that achieve state-of-the-art over an unseen Arabic testing set. |
Can GPT-4 Identify Propaganda? Annotation and Detection of Propaganda Spans in News Articles (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using large language models (LLMs) to detect propaganda from text is a challenge for the development of sophisticated models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large propaganda dataset to identify propagandistic content in text, visual, or multimodal languages to improve their models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on a large propaganda dataset than the existing models on skewed datasets. |
Unleashing the Power of Discourse-Enhanced Transformers for Propaganda Detection (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing systems focused on the surface words, ignoring the linguistic structure of the texts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use discourse analysis to analyze paragraph-level and token-level classifications and propose a Transformer architecture that can be used to detect propaganda. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves on English and Russian texts and shows strong correlations between propaganda instances and discourse spans. |
On Sentence Representations for Propaganda Detection: From Handcrafted Features to Word Embeddings (D19-50)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The rise of fake and hyperpartisan news on social media and online news outlets calls for improved automatic detection of propaganda in texts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use handcrafted features and learn dense semantic representations to detect propaganda in sentence-level and with random undersampling of the majority class (non-propaganda) |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves a ranking of 10 among 25 participants, with 59.5 F1-score. |
KinyaProp: Fine-Grained Propaganda Annotation in Kinyarwanda (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Propaganda is a widely used approach for shaping public opinion and disseminating misinformation in news media. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained propaganda dataset for Kinyarwanda . they find that current LLMs are not reliable annotators in low resource settings . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that current LLMs perform poorly in low resource settings . the dataset shows they perform poorly on discourse-level techniques . |
Reasoning-Aware AIGC Detection via Alignment and Reinforcement (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to AIGC detection have relied on statistical classifiers or black-box neural models, which exploit surface-level patterns and struggle to generalize as LLMs evolve. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that generates interpretable reasoning chains before classification using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to improve accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks, offering a robust and transparent solution for AIGC detection. |
NSIT@NLP4IF-2019: Propaganda Detection from News Articles using Transfer Learning (D19-50)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we describe our approach and system description for NLP4IF 2019 Workshop: Shared Task on Fine-Grained Propaganda Detection. |
| Approach: | They propose to use document Embeddings and LSTM to detect whether a sentence contains a propagandistic agenda. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach ranked 21st in the NLP4IF 2019 Workshop: Shared Task on Fine-Grained Propaganda Detection. |
A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xianjun Yang, Liangming Pan, Xuandong Zhao, Haifeng Chen, Linda Petzold, William Yang Wang, Wei Cheng
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to an increase in synthetic content generation . the ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance . |
| Approach: | They propose to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks, scrutinizing their differences and advocating for more adaptable and robust models to enhance detection accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be able to detect human-written content in real time. |