RepoDebug: Repository-Level Multi-Task and Multi-Language Debugging Evaluation of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Jingjing Liu, Zeming Liu, Zihao Cheng, Mengliang He, Xiaoming Shi, Yuhang Guo, Xiangrong Zhu, Yuanfang Guo, Yunhong Wang, Haifeng Wang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited significant proficiency in code debugging, especially in automatic program repair. |
| Approach: | They propose a repository-level code debugging dataset with 22 subtypes of errors that supports 8 commonly used programming languages and 3 debug tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset supports 8 commonly used programming languages and 3 debugging tasks. |
Similar Papers
DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Runchu Tian, Yining Ye, Yujia Qin, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin, Yinxu Pan, Yesai Wu, Hui Haotian, Liu Weichuan, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional coding capabilities, but their debugging capabilities remain relatively unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a debugging benchmark consisting of 4,253 LLMs with four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. |
MdEval: Massively Multilingual Code Debugging (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Shukai Liu, Linzheng Chai, Jian Yang, Jiajun Shi, He Zhu, Liran Wang, Jin Ke, Wei Zhang, Hualei Zhu, Shuyue Guo, Tao Sun, Jiaheng Liu, Yunlong Duan, Yu Hao, Liqun Yang, Guanglin Niu, Ge Zhang, Zhoujun Li
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are limited in terms of language diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual debugging benchmark that includes 3.9K test samples of 20 programming languages and introduces the debug instruction corpora MdEval-Instruct by injecting bugs into the correct multilingual queries and solutions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark includes 3.9K test samples of 20 programming languages and covers the automated program repair task, bug localization task, and bug identification task. |
Turning the Tide: Repository-based Code Reflection (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Code large language models (LLMs) enhance programming by understanding and generating code across languages. |
| Approach: | a new benchmark evaluates code understanding and generation in repositories using code large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves code understanding and generation in repositories by evaluating 1,888 test cases across 6 programming languages. |
DependEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Repository Dependency Understanding (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a benchmark is designed to evaluate the repository-level dependency understanding of large language models (LLMs) based on 2683 repositories from real-world websites. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate repository dependency understanding for large language models . DEPENDEVAL evaluates models on three core tasks across 8 programming languages . |
| Outcome: | The benchmark evaluates models on three core tasks across 8 programming languages from real-world repositories. |
Can Language Models Replace Programmers for Coding? REPOCOD Says ‘Not Yet’ (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for code generation use short completions, synthetic examples, or focus on limited scale repositories, failing to represent real-world coding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Python code-generation benchmark that contains 980 whole-function generation tasks with realistic dependencies from 11 popular projects. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are short completions, synthetic examples, or focus on limited scale repositories, failing to represent real-world coding tasks. |
Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step by Step (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are leading progress in code generation, but they are underutilized in the literature. |
| Approach: | They propose a debugging framework that allows LLMs to refine their generated programs with the runtime execution information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the baseline performance by 9.8% across the HumanEval, MBPP, and TransCoder benchmarks. |
XCodeEval: An Execution-based Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have shown impressive abilities in generating codes from natural language descriptions, repairing buggy codes, translating codes between languages, and retrieving relevant code segments. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual multitask benchmark to evaluate large language models that can generate codes from natural language descriptions, repair buggy codes, and translate between languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs 7 tasks covering up to 11 languages with execution-level parallelism and 25 M document-level coding examples (16.5 B tokens) |
Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Bowen Li, Wenhan Wu, Ziwei Tang, Lin Shi, John Yang, Jinyang Li, Shunyu Yao, Chen Qian, Binyuan Hui, Qicheng Zhang, Zhiyin Yu, He Du, Ping Yang, Dahua Lin, Chao Peng, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focused on simplified or isolated aspects of coding, ignoring the full spectrum of programming challenges. |
| Approach: | They propose a case study that examines the performance of large language models across the entire software development lifecycle with four programming languages, multiple domains, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs across the entire software development lifecycle, including design, environment setup, implementation, acceptance testing, and unit testing. |
MLDebugging: Towards Benchmarking Code Debugging Across Multi-Library Scenarios (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
JinYang Huang, Xiachong Feng, Qiguang Chen, Hanjie Zhao, Zihui Cheng, Jiesong Bai, Jingxuan Zhou, Min Li, Libo Qin
| Challenge: | MLDebugging is a benchmark designed to assess debugging challenges within multi-library Python code. |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce a benchmark to assess debugging challenges within multi-library Python code using 126 Python libraries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 126 Python libraries and a wide range of multi-library code issues. |
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan, Haidar Khan, Israt Jahan, Amran Bhuiyan, Chee Wei Tan, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains. |
| Approach: | They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust. |