MASSIVE-Agents: A Benchmark for Multilingual Function-Calling in 52 Languages (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using the original dataset, we cleaned up the MASSIVE dataset and reformatted it for evaluation within the Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard framework. |
| Approach: | They present a new benchmark for assessing multilingual function calling across 52 languages . they clean the original MASSIVE dataset and reformat it for evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark covers 55 functions and 286 arguments in 52 languages. |
Similar Papers
MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Kabir Ahuja, Harshita Diddee, Rishav Hada, Millicent Ochieng, Krithika Ramesh, Prachi Jain, Akshay Nambi, Tanuja Ganu, Sameer Segal, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Large Large Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on many natural language processing tasks such as language understanding, reasoning, and language generation. |
| Approach: | They present a framework for evaluating generative LLMs in the multilingual setting and provide directions for future progress in the field. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates generative models on 16 NLP datasets across 70 typologically diverse languages and compares them to state-of-the-art non-autoregressive models. |
GlotEval: A Test Suite for Massively Multilingual Evaluation of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Hengyu Luo, Zihao Li, Joseph Attieh, Sawal Devkota, Ona de Gibert, Xu Huang, Shaoxiong Ji, Peiqin Lin, Bhavani Sai Praneeth Varma Mantina, Ananda Sreenidhi, Raúl Vázquez, Mengjie Wang, Samea Yusofi, Fei Yuan, Jörg Tiedemann
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on English and a handful of high-resource languages, thereby overlooking the realistic performance of large language models in multilingual and lower-resourced scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified and lightweight framework that integrates 27 benchmarks under a standard ISO 639-3 language identifier system to enable seamless incorporation of new benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates 27 benchmarks under a standard ISO 639-3 language identifier system, allowing for seamless incorporation of new benchmarks. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe Zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Simon Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose a Massive Multitask Agent Understanding benchmark that evaluates LLMs across five domains and offline tasks. |
| Outcome: | The Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark evaluates models across five domains including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. |
Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that invoke external tools through structured function calls. |
| Approach: | They introduce a diagnostic benchmark and conduct a systematic evaluation of multilingual tool calling across Chinese, Hindi, and the low-resource language Igbo. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that multilingual tool calling fails despite correct intent understanding and tool selection. |
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Weihao Xuan, Rui Yang, Heli Qi, Qingcheng Zeng, Yunze Xiao, Aosong Feng, Dairui Liu, Yun Xing, Junjue Wang, Fan Gao, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Huitao Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Ruihai Dong, Shangding Gu, Yuekang Li, Xiaofei Xie, Felix Juefei-Xu, Foutse Khomh, Osamu Yoshie, Qingyu Chen, Douglas Teodoro, Nan Liu, Randy Goebel, Lei Ma, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Shijian Lu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Existing large language model evaluation benchmarks focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-lingual reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
MultiBLiMP 1.0: A Massively Multilingual Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (2026.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MultiBLiMP 1.0 is a massively multilingual benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs covering 101 languages and 2 types of subject-verb agreement. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multilingual benchmarks to evaluate linguistic minimal pairs in 101 languages and 2 types of subject-verb agreement to create the minimal pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 101 languages and 2 types of subject-verb agreement, and contains more than 128,000 minimal pairs. |
MAPS: A Multilingual Benchmark for Agent Performance and Security (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Omer Hofman, Jonathan Brokman, Oren Rachmil, Shamik Bose, Vikas Pahuja, Toshiya Shimizu, Trisha Starostina, Kelly Marchisio, Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant, Roman Vainshtein
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks do not provide a comprehensive, multi-domain, security-aware evaluation of multilingual agentic AI systems. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual benchmark suite to evaluate agentic AI systems across languages and tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates agentic AI systems across languages and tasks. |
MEGAVERSE: Benchmarking Large Language Models Across Languages, Modalities, Models and Tasks (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Sanchit Ahuja, Divyanshu Aggarwal, Varun Gumma, Ishaan Watts, Ashutosh Sathe, Millicent Ochieng, Rishav Hada, Prachi Jain, Mohamed Ahmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Several new LLMs have been introduced necessitating their evaluation on non-English languages. |
| Approach: | They perform a thorough evaluation of the non-English capabilities of SoTA LLMs by comparing them on the same set of multilingual datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models on multilingual datasets on 22 languages including low-resource African languages. |
MULTITuDE: Large-Scale Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmark (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dominik Macko, Robert Moro, Adaku Uchendu, Jason Lucas, Michiharu Yamashita, Matúš Pikuliak, Ivan Srba, Thai Le, Dongwon Lee, Jakub Simko, Maria Bielikova
| Challenge: | MULTITuDE benchmarks lack authentic and machine-generated text in languages other than English . defining characteristic of new generation of LLMs is increased quality of text . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking dataset for multilingual machine-generated text detection that compares detectors with authentic and machine-generated texts in 11 languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset compares detectors with zero-shot and fine-tuned detectors in 11 languages. |