Challenge: Stance detection (SD) identifies a text’s position towards a target, typically labeled as favor, against, or none.
Approach: They introduce Open-Target Stance Detection (OTSD) which aims to determine the position of a text towards a target, typically labeled as favor, against, or none.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the only existing task, Target-Stance Extraction (TSE), which benefits from predefined targets.

Similar Papers

LLM-Driven Knowledge Injection Advances Zero-Shot and Cross-Target Stance Detection (2024.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for stance detection focus on background information and not on the accompanying input texts.
Approach: They propose to prompt Large Language Models to explicitly extract the relationship between paired text and unseen target as contextual knowledge and inject it into a generation model BART to exploit the rich contexts and semantics.
Outcome: The proposed model is able to detect stance labels in zero-shot and cross-target scenarios.
Are Stereotypes Leading LLMs’ Zero-Shot Stance Detection ? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models inherit stereotypes from their pretraining data, leading to biased behavior toward certain social groups in many tasks.
Approach: They propose to annotate posts in pre-existing stance detection datasets with dialect or vernacular of a specific group and text complexity/readability to investigate whether these attributes influence the model’s stance detect decisions.
Outcome: The proposed model exhibits significant stereotypes when performing stance detection tasks in a zero-shot setting.
A New Direction in Stance Detection: Target-Stance Extraction in the Wild (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for stance detection assume that the target is known in advance . Existing tasks use implicit mentions in the source text and are infeasible to have manual annotations at a large scale.
Approach: They propose a task Target-Stance Extraction that aims to extract the (target, stance) pair from social media texts.
Outcome: The proposed task can facilitate future research in the field of stance detection.
DEEM: Dynamic Experienced Expert Modeling for Stance Detection (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on stance detection tasks using large language models shows promising results, but it may not be able to provide detailed background knowledge.
Approach: They propose a method which leverages the generated experienced experts and lets LLMs reason in a semi-parametric way.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms methods with self-consistency reasoning and reduces bias.
LLM-Driven Implicit Target Augmentation and Fine-Grained Contextual Modeling for Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Stance Detection (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies on zero-shot and few-shot stance detection neglect implicit yet semantically important targets.
Approach: They propose a framework that uses Large Language Models to annotate implicit targets . they also propose 'DyMCA' to dynamically adjust text-target contributions based on context .
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on a benchmark dataset.
Modeling Human-Like Cognition for Stance Detection: Integrating Intuitive Judgment and Analytical Reasoning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized stance detection, enabling complex reasoning strategies such as chain-of-thought prompting.
Approach: They propose Cognitive-Driven Stance Detection (CDSD) that integrates fast intuitive judgment and analytical reasoning enhanced by three key modules: attention-based cognitive alignment to compare system focus, uncertainty-aware belief update using Bayesian inference, and self-doubt-triggered counterfactual reasoning for re-evaluation under low consistency or high uncertainty.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods on SEM16, P-Stance, and VAST.
Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representations (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for stance detection are topic-specific and cross-target stance.
Approach: They propose a new dataset for zero-shot stance detection that captures a wider range of topics and lexical variation than in previous datasets.
Outcome: The proposed model improves performance on a number of challenging linguistic phenomena.
Cross-Domain Label-Adaptive Stance Detection (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Stance detection is a task that focuses on the classification of a writer’s viewpoint towards a target.
Approach: They propose an end-to-end unsupervised framework for out-of-domain prediction of unseen, user-defined labels.
Outcome: The proposed framework shows that it can be used to predict unseen labels over strong baselines.
Reinforcement Tuning for Detecting Stances and Debunking Rumors Jointly with Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Social media has become a fertile ground for nurturing rumors and misinformation due to its lack of systematic moderation.
Approach: They propose a framework to enhance the joint predictive capabilities of LLMs for stance detection and rumor verification tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods and generalizes to non-LLMs accommodated as task models.
ZeroStance: Leveraging ChatGPT for Open-Domain Stance Detection via Dataset Generation (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Until recently, zero-shot stance detection was limited to in-domain tasks.
Approach: They propose a method for stance detection that trains a model that can generalize well to unseen targets across multiple domains.
Outcome: The proposed method generalizes well to unseen targets across multiple domains over baselines on most benchmarks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations