| Challenge: | Stance detection is a task that focuses on the classification of a writer’s viewpoint towards a target. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end unsupervised framework for out-of-domain prediction of unseen, user-defined labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that it can be used to predict unseen labels over strong baselines. |
Similar Papers
P-Stance: A Large Dataset for Stance Detection in Political Domain (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | stance detection is a method to determine whether a text author is in favor of, against or neutral toward a specific target. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large stance detection dataset in the political domain to detect stances on twitter. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves a macro-average F1-score of 80.53% and can be used to improve cross-domain stance detection. |
Contrastive Language Adaptation for Cross-Lingual Stance Detection (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches to fact-checking are time-consuming and tedious. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach which leverages labeled data in one language to identify relative perspective of a document with respect to a claim in a different target language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can deal with the challenge of limited labeled data in the target language. |
Topic-Guided Sampling For Data-Efficient Multi-Domain Stance Detection (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Stance Detection is a task that aims to identify the attitudes of an author towards a target of interest. |
| Approach: | They propose a topic-guided diversity sampling technique and a contrastive objective to improve stance detection using the produced set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art on 16 datasets with in-domain and out-of domain evaluations and is more generalizable with an averaged 10.2 F1 on out-domain evaluation. |
Guiding Computational Stance Detection with Expanded Stance Triangle Framework (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that strategically-enriched data can significantly improve the performance on out-of-domain and cross-target evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose to decompose a stance detection task from a theoretical perspective and extend it with additional annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task improves performance on out-of-domain and cross-target evaluations using a linguistic framework. |
Target-Aware Data Augmentation for Stance Detection (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for stance detection are not diversified or inconsistent with the given target and label information. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment a text with a conditional masked word prediction task . they propose to replace a target mention with 'target-aware' sentences by replacing a reference word with . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on 11 targets. |
TATA: Stance Detection via Topic-Agnostic and Topic-Aware Embeddings (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on topic-specific stance classifiers that fail to generalize to unseen topics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contrastive learning and an unlabeled dataset to train topic-agnostic/TAG and topic-aligned/TAW embeddings for use in downstream stance detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance across several public stance detection datasets (0.771 F1-score on the Zero-shot VAST dataset). |
Target-Oriented Relation Alignment for Cross-Lingual Stance Detection (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on cross-lingual stance detection has ignored the inconsistency in the occurrences and distributions of targets between languages, which consequently degrades the performance of stance detector in low-resource languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained method which considers both target-level associations and language-level alignments to learn the in-language and cross-language associations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is compared with competing methods under variant settings and shows that it performs better in low-resource languages. |
Multi-Task Stance Detection with Sentiment and Stance Lexicons (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show improvements in stance detection by using attention mechanism or sentiment information. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task framework that incorporates attention mechanism and takes sentiment classification as an auxiliary task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art deep learning methods on the SemEval-2016 dataset. |
A New Direction in Stance Detection: Target-Stance Extraction in the Wild (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for stance detection assume that the target is known in advance . Existing tasks use implicit mentions in the source text and are infeasible to have manual annotations at a large scale. |
| Approach: | They propose a task Target-Stance Extraction that aims to extract the (target, stance) pair from social media texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task can facilitate future research in the field of stance detection. |
A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Multi-Target Stance Detection (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models fail to learn target-specific representations and are prone to overfitting. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task learning network to train one model on all target pairs . their results show that their proposed model outperforms the best-performing baseline by 12.39% . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the best-performing baseline model by 12.39% in macro-averaged F1-score. |