Challenge: a study compares zero-shot role-playing, reasoning-optimized LLMs, and reasoning-based LLM.
Approach: They propose to use reasoning-optimized LLMs to improve role-playing performance . they propose to develop a chain-of-thought-based learning system that can be used to improve LLM performance if reasoning is used .
Outcome: The proposed research compares zero-shot role-playing, role-playering with Chain-of-Thought, and reasoning-optimized LLMs.

Similar Papers

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence that plays a crucial role in many intellectual activities.
Approach: They propose to improve LLMs' ability to elicit reasoning by providing exemplars or prompts to model reasoning.
Outcome: This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on reasoning in large language models.
How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning? (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using chain-of-thought to elicit reasoning capabilities is not always effective and accurate.
Approach: They compare the reasoning process of LLMs with humans to understand the causal chain . they find that LLM deviates from the ideal causal chain, resulting in spurious correlations .
Outcome: The proposed method does not improve performance or accurately represent reasoning processes in LLMs.
Explore the Reasoning Capability of LLMs in the Chess Testbed (2025.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that large language models struggle with long-term, complex reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose to integrate annotated strategy and tactic into large language models to improve reasoning capability.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better than GPT, Claude, and Gemini models . it integrates annotated strategy and tactic into the model .
Aligning Large and Small Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2024.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting empowers Large Language Models to solve complex reasoning tasks in a step-wise manner.
Approach: They propose a method for aligning and transferring reasoning abilities between larger and smaller Language Models by using CoT-Demonstrations.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baselines on question-answering and mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Prompting (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent years have witnessed a paradigm shift in natural language processing, driven by large language models such as GPT-3, PaLM, and Llama.
Approach: They propose a strategy for role-play prompting and assess its performance under the zero-shot setting.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms the standard zero-shot prompting approach across 12 reasoning benchmarks.
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial.
Approach: This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO.
Outcome: This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning.
On the Impact of Fine-Tuning on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have emerged as powerful tools for general intelligence, showcasing advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Approach: They propose to use supervised fine-tuning and Quantized Low-Rank Adapters to improve LLMs' task-specific performance to address privacy and safety risks.
Outcome: The proposed model improves the accuracy of the chain-of-thought reasonings across four datasets and demonstrates that the faithfulness of CoT reasoning decreases.
Evaluating the Deductive Competence of Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing large language models have limited abilities to solve deductive reasoning problems . performance differences between conditions do not improve overall performance .
Approach: They investigate whether several large language models can solve a deductive reasoning problem in their conventional form.
Outcome: The proposed models can solve a classic type of deductive reasoning problem in their conventional form.
Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key? (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent progress in LLMs discussion suggests that multi-agent discussion improves the reasoning abilities of LLM.
Approach: They propose a group discussion framework to enrich the set of discussion mechanisms.
Outcome: The proposed framework performs better on a wide range of reasoning tasks and backbone LLMs.
Unlocking General Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Representation Engineering (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work finds that long CoT reasoning can be efficiently elicited by tuning on only a few examples and can easily transfer to other tasks.
Approach: They propose a representation engineering method to unleash the general long CoT reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed method is effective in in-domain and cross-domain scenarios.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations