A Representation Level Analysis of NMT Model Robustness to Grammatical Errors (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on robustness failures or improving robustness has focused on documenting failures . however, there has been limited analysis of model representations in response to noise. |
| Approach: | They perform Grammatical Error Detection probing and representational similarity analysis to examine model representations of ungrammatical inputs and how they evolve through model layers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model detects and corrects the grammatical error by moving its representation toward the correct form. |
Similar Papers
On the Robustness of Language Encoders against Grammatical Errors (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language encoders are effective in facilitating downstream natural language processing tasks, but they often assume training and test corpora are clean and it is unclear how the models behave when confronted with noisy input. |
| Approach: | They conduct adversarial attacks to simulate grammatical errors on clean text data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better when confronted with natural grammatical errors than when faced with noisy input. |
Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the performance gains, NLP models are still fragile and brittle to out-of-domain data, adversarial attacks, or small perturbation to the input. |
| Approach: | They propose a survey of how to define, measure and improve robustness in NLP by connecting multiple definitions of robustness and identifying failures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are robust against unseen or challenging scenarios, but are still fragile and brittle to out-of-domain data and adversarial attacks. |
Methods for Estimating and Improving Robustness of Language Models (2022.naacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models suffer from weak generalisation ability due to shallow textual relations over full semantic complexity of the problem. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate some of these measures into training objectives to enhance distributional robustness of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform human models on complex tasks and outperformed other models on deep networks. |
Robustness and Adversarial Examples in Natural Language Processing (2021.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial aims to raise awareness of practical concerns about NLP robustness . it aims at addressing the weaknesses of NLP systems when faced with adversarial inputs and data with a distribution shift . |
| Approach: | This tutorial aims to bring awareness of practical concerns about NLP robustness . it reviews recent studies on analyzing the weakness of NLP systems when facing adversarial inputs . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial aims to bring awareness of practical concerns about NLP robustness . it will examine the weaknesses of NLP systems when faced with adversarial inputs and data with a distribution shift . |
Whispers of Doubt Amidst Echoes of Triumph in NLP Robustness (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to measure robustness are problematic, and out-of-domain evaluations are no longer relevant. |
| Approach: | They examine models of different sizes spanning different architectural choices and pretraining objectives. |
| Outcome: | The results show that not all out-of-domain tests provide insight into robustness . merely scaling models does not make them adequately robust . |
Sometimes We Want Ungrammatical Translations (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems focus on improving translation quality and improving robustness to perturbations. |
| Approach: | They propose a way to quantify faithfulness to the original text by focusing on word-order perturbations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method aims to measure faithfulness and robustness in word-order perturbations without deleting or injecting tokens. |
Improving Neural Machine Translation Robustness via Data Augmentation: Beyond Back-Translation (D19-55)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural Machine Translation models are sensitive to noise in the input data. |
| Approach: | They propose new methods to extend limited noisy data and further improve NMT robustness to noise while keeping the models small. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods extend limited noisy data and improve robustness to noise while keeping the models small. |
Do Multilingual Neural Machine Translation Models Contain Language Pair Specific Attention Heads? (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies on multilingual representations focus on whether there is an emergence of language-independent representations or whether multilingual models partition their weights among different languages. |
| Approach: | They analyze encoder self-attention and encoder-decoder attention heads in a multilingual neural translation model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a multilingual neural translation model with a language-independent representation. |
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Neural Machine Translation of Text from Non-Native Speakers (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems are known to degrade when confronted with noisy data. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment training data with sentences containing artificially-introduced grammatical errors to make the system more robust to such errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach recovers 1.0 BLEU out of 2.4 BLUE lost due to grammatical errors on a set of Spanish translations of the JFLEG grammar error correction corpus. |