Understanding the Thinking Process of Reasoning Models: A Perspective from Schoenfeld’s Episode Theory (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ming Li, Nan Zhang, Chenrui Fan, Hong Jiao, Yanbin Fu, Sydney Peters, Qingshu Xu, Robert Lissitz, Tianyi Zhou
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) generate extensive chain-of-thought reasoning, but we lack a principled framework for understanding how these thoughts are structured. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to analyze the reasoning traces of Large Reasoning Models using Schoenfeld’s Episode Theory. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides a theoretically grounded methodology for interpreting LRM cognition and enables future work on more controllable and transparent reasoning systems. |
Similar Papers
Schoenfeld’s Anatomy of Mathematical Reasoning by Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models expose reasoning traces, yet their underlying cognitive structure and steps remain difficult to identify and analyze beyond surface-level statistics. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that explicitly abstracts reasoning traces into functional reasoning steps such as Analysis, Explore, Implement, Verify, etc. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reveals reproducible thinking dynamics and structural differences between reasoning and non-reasoning models, which are not apparent from token-level views. |
Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often display unstable behaviors, e.g., hallucinating unsupported premises, overthinking simple tasks, and displaying higher sensitivity to prompt variations. |
| Approach: | They propose a graph-based analytical framework that clusters long, verbose CoT outputs into semantically coherent reasoning steps, then constructs directed reasoning graphs to capture contextual and logical dependencies among these steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables quantitative evaluation of internal reasoning structure and quality beyond conventional metrics and provides practical insights for prompt engineering and cognitive analysis of LLMs. |
Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamics (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Sheldon Yu, Yuxin Xiong, Junda Wu, Xintong Li, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Ritwik Sinha, Jingbo Shang, Julian McAuley
| Challenge: | Recent advances in chain-of-thought prompting have demonstrated the ability of large language models to perform multi-step reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to analyze latent dynamics of CoT trajectories for interpretability . they segment generated CoT into discrete reasoning steps and abstract each step into a spectral embedding based on token-level Gram matrices . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework segments generated CoT steps into discrete reasoning steps, abstracts each step into a spectral embedding based on token-level Gram matrices, and clusters these embeddements into semantically meaningful latent states. |
How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using chain-of-thought to elicit reasoning capabilities is not always effective and accurate. |
| Approach: | They compare the reasoning process of LLMs with humans to understand the causal chain . they find that LLM deviates from the ideal causal chain, resulting in spurious correlations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method does not improve performance or accurately represent reasoning processes in LLMs. |
What Makes a Good Reasoning Chain? Uncovering Structural Patterns in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in reasoning with large language models have popularized Long Chain-of-Thought (LCoT) a framework that converts sequential LCoTs into hierarchical tree structures enables deeper structural analysis of LLM reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that converts sequential LCoTs into hierarchical tree structures and enables deeper structural analysis of LLM reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to analyze LLM reasoning in a variety of tasks and models. |
From "Aha Moments" to Controllable Thinking: Toward Meta-Cognitive Reasoning in LRMs via Decoupled Reasoning and Control (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models exhibit step-by-step reasoning, reflection, and backtracking, but these behaviors are often unregulated, leading to overthinking. |
| Approach: | They propose a meta-cognitive reasoning framework that decouples reasoning from control to enable independent optimization of control strategies. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that the proposed model improves efficiency and accuracy across reasoning benchmarks. |
From Complex to Simple: Unraveling the Cognitive Tree for Reasoning with Small Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to solve complex logical reasoning problems are cumbersome for language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use iterative methodology to construct a cognitive tree using language models . they propose to generate multiple responses by utilizing in-context examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves a performance level comparable to that of GPT-3.5 . the proposed model contains fewer parameters than 5% of the model with 175B parameters . |
AlgBench: To What Extent Do Large Reasoning Models Understand Algorithms? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for algorithmic reasoning fail to answer a critical question: do LRMs master algorithmic thinking? Empirical evaluations on leading LRM models reveal substantial performance heterogeneity, while models perform well on non-optimized tasks, accuracy drops sharply to around 49% on globally optimized algorithms. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm-centric benchmark that evaluates large reasoning models under an algorithmic paradigm. |
| Outcome: | Empirical evaluations on leading LRMs reveal substantial performance heterogeneity . models perform well on non-optimized tasks, accuracy drops sharply to around 49% . |
Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failures (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yi Hu, Jiaqi Gu, Ruxin Wang, Zijun Yao, Hao Peng, Xiaobao Wu, Jianhui Chen, Muhan Zhang, Liangming Pan
| Challenge: | Recent research has shown that reinforcement learning can elicit intriguing emergent reasoning behaviors. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive survey of the mechanistic understanding of large reasoning models . they organize findings into three core dimensions: 1) training dynamics, 2) reasoning mechanisms, and 3) unintended behaviors. |
| Outcome: | This paper synthesizes the mechanistic understanding of large reasoning models into three dimensions . authors outline a roadmap for future studies including improved interpretability and methodologies . |
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence that plays a crucial role in many intellectual activities. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve LLMs' ability to elicit reasoning by providing exemplars or prompts to model reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on reasoning in large language models. |