V-SEAM: Visual Semantic Editing and Attention Modulating for Causal Interpretability of Vision-Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on causal interpretability focuses on large language models (LLMs) but internal mechanisms of vision-language models remain underexplored, authors say . |
| Approach: | They introduce a framework that combines visual and semantic manipulations for causal interpretation of vision-language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows improved performance for LLAVA and InstructBLIP on three diverse benchmarks. |
Similar Papers
Treble Counterfactual VLMs: A Causal Approach to Hallucination (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies link hallucination to data or representation biases, but their causal origins remain unclear. |
| Approach: | They propose a causal framework to analyze and mitigate hallucination in vision-language models by using counterfactual analysis to estimate the Natural Direct Effect (NDE) of each modality and their interaction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly reduces hallucination while preserving task performance while retaining reliability. |
What Do VLMs NOTICE? A Mechanistic Interpretability Pipeline for Gaussian-Noise-free Text-Image Corruption and Evaluation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have gained prominence due to their success in solving complex cross-modal tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Gaussian-Noise-free pipeline for mechanistic interpretability in VLMs that introduces Semantic Image Pairs corruption, the first visual counterpart to Symmetric Token Replacement for text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline identifies a set of “universal attention heads” in BLIP and LLaVA that consistently contribute across different tasks and modalities. |
What’s Missing in Vision-Language Models? Probing Their Struggles with Causal Order Reasoning (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks often include a mixture of reasoning questions, making it difficult to truly assess VLMs’ causal reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose two new benchmarks specifically designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate VLMs’ causal reasoning abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that vision-language models perform poorly on causal reasoning tasks, often only marginally surpassing random guessing. |
Weaving Context Across Images: Improving Vision-Language Models through Focus-Centric Visual Chains (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing vision-language models struggle to disentangle information scattered across complex visual inputs, leading to performance degradation. |
| Approach: | They propose a focus-centric visual chain paradigm that enhances VLMs’ perception, comprehension, and reasoning abilities in multi-image scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves average performance gains of 3.16% and 2.24% across two distinct model architectures, without compromising the general vision-language capabilities. |
Can VLMs Actually See and Read? A Survey on Modality Collapse in Vision-Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Vision-language models integrate textual and visual information, enabling them to process visual inputs and generate predictions. |
| Approach: | They review work on modality collapse analysis to provide insights into the reason for this unintended behavior and review probing studies for fine-grained vision-language understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can achieve competitive performance in vision-language tasks despite relying heavily on textual information and ignoring visual information. |
CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large vision-language models have shown impressive ability in various language tasks, especially with their emergent in-context learning capability. |
| Approach: | They propose a causal reasoning benchmark for multi-modal in-context learning from large vision-language models that incorporates visual inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on three visual causal reasoning tasks and demonstrates their strengths and weaknesses. |
Adapting Vision-Language Models for E-commerce Understanding at Scale (2026.eacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Matteo Nulli, Vladimir Orshulevich, Tala Bazazo, Christian Herold, Michael Kozielski, Marcin Mazur, Szymon Tuzel, Cees G. M. Snoek, Seyyed Hadi Hashemi, Omar Javed, Yannick Versley, Shahram Khadivi
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to adapt VLMs to attribute-centric, multi-image, and noisy data are limited. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel evaluation suite that incorporates deep product understanding, strict instruction following, and dynamic attribute extraction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves e-commerce performance while preserving broad multimodal capabilities. |
A Corpus for Visual Question Answering Annotated with Frame Semantic Information (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a computer vision problem. |
| Approach: | They propose to annotate a visual question answering dataset with verb semantics to help the model understand verbs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is built on the imSitu dataset annotated with verb semantic information. |
How Do LLMs and VLMs Understand Viewpoint Rotation Without Vision? An Interpretability Study (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhen Yang, Ping Jian, Zhongbin Guo, Zuming Zhang, Chengzhi Li, Yonghong Deng, Xinyue Zhang, Wenpeng Lu
| Challenge: | Existing studies on spatial intelligence from the perspective of visual-spatial intelligence have not explored whether visual intelligence alone is sufficient to endow models with spatial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a linguistic perspective to investigate spatial intelligence from a theoretical perspective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs poorly on the proposed dataset while human can easily achieve 100% accuracy. |
Guiding Medical Vision-Language Models with Diverse Visual Prompts: Framework Design and Comprehensive Exploration of Prompt Variations (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current vision-language models lack the ability to focus on specific areas designated by humans . a new framework that integrates medical entity extraction, visual prompt generation, and dataset adaptation is proposed to improve visual prompt-guided fine-tuning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use visual prompts to guide and enhance formation of region-specific attention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art large vision-language models on medical datasets. |