Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion Dynamics (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jiarui Liu, Yueqi Song, Yunze Xiao, Mingqian Zheng, Lindia Tjuatja, Jana Schaich Borg, Mona T. Diab, Maarten Sap
| Challenge: | a study of multi-dimensional persona effects in AI-AI debates shows that personas influence moral stances and debate outcomes . political ideology and personality traits exert the strongest influence, according to our study . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a 6-dimensional persona space to simulate structured debates . they find political ideology and personality traits exert the strongest influence . |
| Outcome: | The study shows that personas affect moral stances and debate outcomes . political ideology and personality traits exert the strongest influence . |
Similar Papers
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
An Empirical Study of Group Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled multi-agent systems that simulate real-world interactions with near-human reasoning. |
| Approach: | They analyze how LLM agents shape public opinion through debates on five contentious topics by simulating over 2,500 debates. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that LLM agents adopt specific stances over time and align with numerically dominant groups or more intelligent agents, exerting a greater influence. |
Evaluating Large Language Model Biases in Persona-Steered Generation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent wave of powerful new large language models has raised concerns that their expressed opinions may be biased towards certain political, national or moral viewpoints. |
| Approach: | They define an incongruous persona as a persona with multiple traits where one trait makes its other traits less likely in human survey data. |
| Outcome: | The results show that LLMs are less steerable towards incongruous personas than congruous ones . the models that are fine-tuned with RLHF are more steerable, especially towards stances associated with political liberals and women . |
Are Personalized Stochastic Parrots More Dangerous? Evaluating Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models enable them to follow freeform instructions, including imitating generic or specific demographic personas in conversations. |
| Approach: | They propose to investigate persona biases by experimenting with UNIVERSALPERSONA, a model that incorporates both generic and specific personas. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model systematically measures persona biases in harmful expression and harmful agreement. |
Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior studies have reported that large language models (LLMs) are also susceptible to human-like cognitive biases, but the extent to which LLMs selectively reason toward identity-congruent conclusions remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They investigate whether assigning 8 personas across 4 political and socio-demographic attributes induces motivated reasoning in LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is assigned 8 personas across 4 political and socio-demographic attributes and shows that they have 9% reduced veracity discernment compared to models without persona. |
I Know, but I Don’t Know! How Persona Conflict Undermines Instruction Adherence in Large Language Models (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on persona-grounded dialogue assume idealized scenarios where persona and user utterances are fully aligned. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy that categorizes model behaviors into three response types . they propose sycophantic, adherent, and wavering responses as response types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework categorizes model behaviors into three response types and develops a measurement schema grounded in this taxonomy. |
Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Pranav Bhandari, Nicolas Fay, Michael J Wise, Amitava Datta, Stephanie Meek, Usman Naseem, Mehwish Nasim
| Challenge: | Large language models are often subjected to context-shifting behaviour, resulting in a lack of consistent and interpretable personality-aligned interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use two conversation agents to generate a discourse with an assigned personality from the OCEAN framework and then use multiple judge agents to infer original traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on two conversation agents with a personality assigned from the OCEAN framework and then multiple judge agents to infer the original traits assigned. |
PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Vinay Samuel, Henry Peng Zou, Yue Zhou, Shreyas Chaudhari, Ashwin Kalyan, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ameet Deshpande, Karthik R Narasimhan, Vishvak Murahari
| Challenge: | Persona agents are LLM agents conditioned to act according to an assigned persona . evaluating how faithfully these agents adhere to their personas remains a challenge . |
| Approach: | a new study evaluates persona agents' ability to act according to an assigned persona . a persona agent's person score is a human-aligned automatic metric that can be used to evaluate a model . |
| Outcome: | a new evaluation framework and a human-aligned automatic metric show that persona agents can perform better. |
Adaptable Moral Stances of Large Language Models on Sexist Content: Implications for Society and Gender Discourse (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using large language models, large language model learning has become more integrated into our daily lives, making it increasingly important to ensure they reflect ethical and equitable values. |
| Approach: | They assess how LLMs can apply moral reasoning to both criticize and defend sexist language by evaluating their models and evaluating the moral foundations cited by them. |
| Outcome: | The models show they can provide comprehensible and contextually relevant text for understanding diverse views on how sexism is perceived. |
Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-Making (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jillian Fisher, Shangbin Feng, Robert Aron, Thomas Richardson, Yejin Choi, Daniel W Fisher, Jennifer Pan, Yulia Tsvetkov, Katharina Reinecke
| Challenge: | Recent studies have found that biased LLMs can influence decisions in areas such as medical classifications and educational hiring. |
| Approach: | They conducted two interactive experiments on partisan bias in large language models while completing tasks with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model. |
| Outcome: | The results show that prior knowledge of AI is weakly correlated with a reduction of the bias, suggesting that AI education can be crucial for mitigating bias effects. |