Context Reasoner: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability for Contextualized Privacy and Safety Compliance via Reinforcement Learning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Wenbin Hu, Haoran Li, Huihao Jing, Qi Hu, Ziqian Zeng, Sirui Han, Xu Heli, Tianshu Chu, Peizhao Hu, Yangqiu Song
| Challenge: | Current mitigation strategies fail to preserve contextual reasoning capabilities in risky scenarios, leading to systemic risks for legal compliance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning with a rule-based reward to incentivize contextual reasoning capabilities while enhancing compliance with safety and privacy norms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model in safety and privacy benchmarks and achieves +8.58% accuracy improvement. |
Similar Papers
PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliance (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haoran Li, Wenbin Hu, Huihao Jing, Yulin Chen, Qi Hu, Sirui Han, Tianshu Chu, Peizhao Hu, Yangqiu Song
| Challenge: | Recent advances in generative large language models (LLMs) have enabled wider applicability, accessibility, and flexibility. |
| Approach: | They propose a contextual privacy evaluation benchmark that covers the entire relevant social context through private information flows. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks cover legal compliance, real court cases, privacy policies, and synthetic data. |
ContextLens: Modeling Imperfect Privacy and Safety Context for Legal Compliance (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haoran Li, Yulin Chen, Huihao Jing, Wenbin Hu, Tsz Ho Li, Chanhou Lou, Hong Ting Tsang, Sirui Han, Yangqiu Song
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to contextualize safety and privacy assessments assume the availability of complete and clear context, whereas real-world contexts tend to be ambiguous and incomplete. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-rule-based framework that leverages large language models to ground the input context in the legal domain and explicitly identify both known and unknown factors for legal compliance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can significantly improve existing baselines without training and can identify the ambiguous and missing factors. |
Towards Operationalizing Right to Data Protection (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work introduces the concept of generating unlearnable datasets (by adding imperceptible spurious correlations to the clean data) this approach is limited by several practical constraints like requiring knowledge of the target model. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that injects imperceptible spurious correlations into natural language datasets, rendering them unlearnable without affecting semantic content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can restrict newer models like GPT-4o and Llama from learning on generated data, resulting in a drop in test accuracy compared to their zero-shot performance. |
Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal Reasoning (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to large language models focus on semantic similarity, neglecting the intricate logical structures and reasoning essential for addressing complex legal issues. |
| Approach: | They propose a Logical-Semantic Integration Model (LSIM) that bridges semantic and logical coherence and a supervised framework that integrates semantic features with in-context learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves accuracy and reliability on a real-world legal QA dataset. |
GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theory (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research studies privacy by exploring various privacy attacks, defenses, and evaluations within narrowly predefined patterns. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages the theory of contextual integrity as a bridge to help LLMs understand the complex contexts for judicial assessing privacy violations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework bridges the theory of contextual integrity as a bridge, creating numerous synthetic scenarios grounded in relevant privacy statutes (e.g., HIPAA). |
Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing privacy studies focus on sub-fields, but they focus on a few sub-domains. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 as an example to develop a checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed checklist covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations. |
Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yijia Xiao, Yiqiao Jin, Yushi Bai, Yue Wu, Xianjun Yang, Xiao Luo, Wenchao Yu, Xujiang Zhao, Yanchi Liu, Quanquan Gu, Haifeng Chen, Wei Wang, Wei Cheng
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable linguistic comprehension and generation capability, but when applied to specialized industries, they face challenges such as hallucination, insufficient domain knowledge, and failing to incorporate the latest domain knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a paradigm for fine-tuning LLMs that effectively injects domain-specific knowledge while safeguarding inference-time data privacy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model protects private data while enhancing the model's knowledge. |
Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lightweight technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight technique that trains only new token embeddings on axioms . they train only new embeddables and evaluate them on unseen tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
Legal Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs: Procedural Alignment through Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing legal mathematical reasoning models lack structured numerical reasoning . existing models perform poorly on LexNum, while LexPam improves both mathematical accuracy and legal coherence. |
| Approach: | They propose a legal mathematical reasoning benchmark LexNum and LexPam to address this problem . LexPam is a two-stage reinforcement learning framework for efficient legal reasoning training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves mathematical accuracy and legal coherence . it also improves legal cohesion and generalizes effectively across tasks and domains. |
UR2 : Unify RAG and Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing attempts to unify large language models are limited to open-domain QA with fixed retrieval settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a general reinforcement learning framework that dynamically coordinates retrieval and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing paradigms on open-domain QA, MMLU-Pro, medical, and mathematical reasoning tasks. |