LeTS: Learning to Think-and-Search via Process-and-Outcome Reward Hybridization (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Qi Zhang, Shouqing Yang, Lirong Gao, Hao Chen, Xiaomeng Hu, Jinglei Chen, Jiexiang Wang, Sheng Guo, Bo Zheng, Haobo Wang, Junbo Zhao
| Challenge: | Recent research focuses on integrating reasoning capabilities into the realm of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via outcome-supervised reinforcement learning (RL). |
| Approach: | They propose a process-level reward module to mitigate the unawareness of intermediate reasoning steps in outcome-level supervision without additional annotation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can boost LLMs’ reasoning ability by integrating external knowledge sources through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) The proposed model can mitigate the unawareness of intermediate reasoning steps in outcome-level supervision without additional annotation. |
Similar Papers
Advancing Reasoning in Diffusion Language Models with Denoising Process Rewards (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for improving reasoning in diffusion language models rely on outcome-based rewards that provide no direct supervision over the denoising process. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that provides a process-level reinforcement signal over denoising trajectory of diffusion language models. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed model improves reasoning stability, interpretability and overall performance. |
R-Search: Empowering LLM Reasoning with Search via Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Qingfei Zhao, Ruobing Wang, Dingling Xu, Daren Zha, Ma Bowen, Zhichun Wang, Shijie Jia, Limin Liu, Xin Wang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in multi-step and long-chain reasoning, but extending their reasoning capabilities to encompass deep interactions with search remains a non-trivial challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Reasoning–Search integration that integrates multi-reward signals to optimize the reasoning–search interaction trajectories. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on seven datasets show that R-Search significantly outperforms mainstream RAG baselines. |
UR2 : Unify RAG and Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing attempts to unify large language models are limited to open-domain QA with fixed retrieval settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a general reinforcement learning framework that dynamically coordinates retrieval and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing paradigms on open-domain QA, MMLU-Pro, medical, and mathematical reasoning tasks. |
Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has shown that large language models can be substantially improved using outcome-level verification signals. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework where intermediate reasoning steps are checked by deterministic, rule-based verifiers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves 20% higher F1 than state-of-the-art models and 6.5% higher than verifiable outcome rewards, with substantial gains in evidence grounding and logical coherence. |
A Comprehensive Survey of Process Reward Models: Data Generation, Model Construction, and Usage (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Congmin Zheng, Jiachen Zhu, Zhuoying Ou, Yuxiang Chen, Kangning Zhang, Rong Shan, Zeyu Zheng, Mengyue Yang, Jianghao Lin, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models that judge only final answers. |
| Approach: | They summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents . goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables finer credit assignment, richer diagnostics, and improved robustness. |
R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) output evaluation scores directly, limiting both learning efficiency and evaluation accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (R-PRM) which activates inherent reasoning to enhance process-level evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on ProcessBench and PRMBench by 13.9 and 8.5 F1 scores. |
RiT: Rubrics-in-Thinking Reinforcement Learning for Improved Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Reasoning Models benefit from generating intermediate reasoning steps alongside final answers. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to introduce thinking-rubric supervision into intermediate reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms outcome-only RL baselines on reasoning-intensive and open-ended tasks. |
Reinforced Efficient Reasoning via Semantically Diverse Exploration (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ziqi Zhao, Zhaochun Ren, Jiahong Zou, Liu Yang, Zhiwei Xu, Xuri Ge, Zhumin Chen, Xinyu Ma, Daiting Shi, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Xin Xin
| Challenge: | Existing methods for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards suffer from limited exploration diversity and inefficient reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that rewards concise and correct reasoning while penalizing unnecessarily long reasoning chains. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on Qwen and Llama models validate the effectiveness and efficiency of ROSE. |
GRAT: Guiding Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning through Process Rewards Tree Search (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to enhance large models for multi-hop question-answering lack the ability for multipath exploration, strategic look-ahead, stepwise evaluation, and global selection. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm guided by Monte Carlo Tree Search and process rewards that assigns fine-grained rewards to each step in the search path. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms various RAG-based methods on four multihop QA datasets and shows that it can self-train and self-update. |
ReCode: Reinforcing Code Generation with Reasoning-Process Rewards (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Bringing process-level supervision into RL often neglects optimizing reasoning quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for RL that integrates reasoning-process rewards with strict execution outcomes and a benchmark comprising preference pairs of superior and inferior reasoning processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the base version of ReCode by 16.1% and reaches performance comparable to GPT-4-Turbo. |