ChartMind: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Complex Real-world Multimodal Chart Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chart question answering (CQA) is a multimodal task for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of vision-language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a chart question answering benchmark that incorporates multilingual contexts and supports open-domain textual outputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the previous three common CQA paradigms: instruction-following, OCR-enhanced, and chain-of-thought. |
Similar Papers
ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Ahmed Masry, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Mahir Ahmed, Aayush Bajaj, Firoz Kabir, Aaryaman Kartha, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mizanur Rahman, Shadikur Rahman, Mehrad Shahmohammadi, Megh Thakkar, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty
| Challenge: | Chart Question Answering systems are limited in their ability to interpret data visually and reason with visual representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a chart-based chart question-answering system that includes 1,341 charts from 99 diverse sources and 1,948 questions in various types. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark includes 1,341 charts from 99 diverse sources and 1,948 questions in various types. |
Chart Question Answering from Real-World Analytical Narratives (2025.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a dataset for chart question answering is constructed from visualization notebooks . data visualizations are an essential modality for communicating complex information about data. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for chart question answering constructed from visualization notebooks . they use real-world, multi-view charts paired with natural language questions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is constructed from student-authored visualization notebooks . it features real-world, multi-view charts paired with natural language questions . initial evaluations highlight significant performance gaps . |
Unraveling the Truth: Do VLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustness (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chart question answering (CQA) is a crucial area of Visual Language Understanding. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the robustness and consistency of current Visual Language Models on a dataset encompassing diverse question categories and chart formats. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models handle varying levels of chart and question complexity and are robust across different visual representations of the same underlying data. |
ChartInsights: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models for Low-Level Chart Question Answering (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chart question answering (ChartQA) tasks are a critical part of visualization charts. |
| Approach: | They propose a chart question answering task that uses MLLMs to analyze charts . they propose 'Chain-of-Charts' textual prompt strategy that directs attention to visual elements . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance by 14.41% and 80% in low-level ChartQA tasks. |
MultiChartQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Multi-Chart Problems (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing chart understanding benchmarks focus on single-chart tasks, neglecting multi-hop reasoning required to extract and integrate information from multiple charts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates MLLMs’ capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering and comparative reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates MLLMs’ capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering and comparative reasoning. |
Charting the Future: Using Chart Question-Answering for Scalable Evaluation of LLM-Driven Data Visualizations (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods rely on human judgment to assess data accuracy and visual communication, which is costly and unscalable. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages Visual Question Answering (VQA) models to automate the evaluation of LLM-generated data visualizations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses data representation quality and communicative clarity of charts using two leading VQA benchmark datasets, ChartQA and PlotQA, with visualizations generated by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 Turbo and Meta’s Llama 3.1 70B-Instruct models. |
ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing datasets that focus on complex reasoning questions do not address such questions as they are template-based and answers come from a fixed-vocabulary. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark that uses visual and logical reasoning to answer questions using a transformer-based model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models achieve state-of-the-art on the previous datasets and on the current one, but also show that they have several challenges in answering complex reasoning questions. |
Beyond Single Plots: A Benchmark for Question Answering on Multi-Charts (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on chart understanding has been limited to single chart images. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset specifically designed for question answering over multi-chart images. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows a 27.4% LLM-based accuracy drop on human-authored questions and a 5.39% gain in the human-generated questions. |
WikiMixQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Question Answering over Tables and Charts (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Negar Foroutan, Angelika Romanou, Matin Ansaripour, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Karl Aberer, Rémi Lebret
| Challenge: | Documents are fundamental to preserving and disseminating information, often incorporating complex layouts, tables, and charts that pose significant challenges for automatic document understanding (DU). |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating cross-modal reasoning over tables and charts extracted from 4,000 Wikipedia pages . they evaluate 12 vision-language models that achieve 70% accuracy when provided with direct context . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates models with high accuracy over tables and charts extracted from 4,000 Wikipedia pages . proprietary models achieve 70% accuracy when provided with direct context, but open-source models perform worse when retrieval from long documents is required. |
DashboardQA: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Question Answering on Interactive Dashboards (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Aaryaman Kartha, Ahmed Masry, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Thinh Lang, Shadikur Rahman, Ridwan Mahbub, Mizanur Rahman, Mahir Ahmed, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty
| Challenge: | Existing question-answering benchmarks for data visualizations focus on static charts instead of interactive dashboards. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess how vision-language GUI agents comprehend and interact with real-world dashboards. |
| Outcome: | The first benchmark explicitly designed to assess how vision-language GUI agents comprehend and interact with real-world dashboards. |