Challenge: Current large language models struggle to answer questions that span tens of thousands of tokens.
Approach: They evaluate 1–4 hop QA over 64k–128k-token excerpts from 83 novels . they find consistent accuracy drops with increased hops and context length .
Outcome: The novelhopqa benchmark evaluates 1–4 hop QA over 64k–128k-token excerpts from 83 public-domain novels.

Similar Papers

What are the Essential Factors in Crafting Effective Long Context Multi-Hop Instruction Datasets? Insights and Best Practices (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to generate long-context instruction-tuning data are limited by poor quality and fewer than 35% of samples are multi-hop .
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates a quality verification agent, a single-hop question generation agent, and a multi-hop questions merger agent to enhance model performance.
Outcome: The proposed framework significantly improves data quality with high-quality, multi-hop, and diverse data.
BioHopR: A Benchmark for Multi-Hop, Multi-Answer Reasoning in Biomedical Domain (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for multi-hop reasoning in biomedical domain are lacking . bioHopR provides benchmarks to evaluate multi-step reasoning in structured biomedic knowledge graphs .
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate multi-hop, multi-answer reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs.
Outcome: BioHopR evaluates multi-hop reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs based on the PrimeKG model . it outperforms proprietary models and open-source biomedal models in 1-hop and 2-hop tasks .
MultiHoax: A Dataset of Multi-hop False-premise questions (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks focus on single-hop FPQs, but real-world reasoning often requires multi-hop inference . state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to detect false premises across different countries, knowledge categories, and multi-step reasoning types.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' ability to handle false premises in complex, multi-step reasoning tasks.
Outcome: The proposed tests show that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to detect false premises across different countries, knowledge categories, and multi-hop reasoning types.
LiteraryQA: Towards Effective Evaluation of Long-document Narrative QA (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing Question Answering systems are limited by noisy documents and flawed QA pairs.
Approach: They propose a high-quality subset of NarrativeQA focused on literary works . they identify and correct low-quality QA samples while removing extraneous text .
Outcome: The proposed subset of NarrativeQA is based on literary works.
Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing multi-hop question answering datasets do not provide a complete explanation for the reasoning process from the question to the answer.
Approach: They propose a multi-hop question answering dataset that uses structured and unstructured data to test reasoning skills.
Outcome: The proposed dataset ensures multi-hop reasoning while being challenging for multi-models.
Seemingly Plausible Distractors in Multi-Hop Reasoning: Are Large Language Models Attentive Readers? (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: State-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) are accredited with a number of different capabilities, including reading comprehension, mathematical and reasoning skills, and possessing scientific knowledge.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to generate seemingly plausible multi-hop reasoning chains that ultimately lead to incorrect answers.
Outcome: The proposed model circumvents the reasoning requirement but in subtle ways . it shows that it is more difficult to generate plausible alternatives .
Making Long-Context Language Models Better Multi-Hop Reasoners (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in long-context modeling have enhanced language models for complex tasks, but they struggle with multi-hop reasoning and noisy contexts.
Approach: They propose an approach that prompts LMs to supply attributions for each assertion during reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves competitive performance on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks, closely paralleling proprietary LMs such as ChatGPT and Claude-instant.
Chain-of-Thought Matters: Improving Long-Context Language Models with Reasoning Path Supervision (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the challenge of handling long-context tasks.
Approach: They propose a chain-of-thought framework that teaches models to generate high-quality reasoning paths for enhanced long-context performance.
Outcome: The proposed framework generalizes across most long-context scenarios and amplifys with increasing context length.
Failure Modes in Multi-Hop QA: The Weakest Link Effect and the Recognition Bottleneck (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have identified a position bias in Large Language Models that causes them to overlook information at certain positions.
Approach: They propose a semantic probe to disentangle position bias in Large Language Models . they propose MFAI to steer attention towards selected positions .
Outcome: The proposed model can locate and integrate information at certain positions even in noisy, long-context settings.
One Thousand and One Pairs: A “novel” challenge for long-context language models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing long-context evaluation methods measure surface-level retrieval capabilities, but do not assess performance on the more challenging task of synthesizing distant and underlying information.
Approach: They propose a dataset of 1,001 minimally different pairs of true and false claims about 67 recently-published English fictional books.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better on pairs that require only sentence-level retrieval vs. global reasoning . the proposed model also performs worse on speculative fiction books with extensive world-building .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations