Tokenization and Representation Biases in Multilingual Models on Dialectal NLP Tasks (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on massive text data in many languages are preferred solution for various Natural Language processing tasks. |
| Approach: | They compare tokenization parity and information parity as representational biases in pre-trained models . they find TP is better predictor of performance on tasks reliant on syntactic and morphological cues . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on dialect classification, topic classification, and extractive question answering tasks. |
Similar Papers
How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Models (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using pretraining data, we find that a designated monolingual tokenizer plays an equally important role in the downstream performance of the model. |
| Approach: | They propose to compare pretrained multilingual models with their monolingual counterparts on a set of five diverse monolingual downstream tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models offer previously unmatched performance in all NLP tasks. |
Tokenization Impacts Multilingual Language Modeling: Assessing Vocabulary Allocation and Overlap Across Languages (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual language models perform surprisingly well in a variety of NLP tasks for diverse languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the quality of lexical representation and vocabulary overlap observed in sub-word tokenizers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed criteria show that the overlap of vocabulary across languages can be detrimental to certain downstream tasks. |
Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial? (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Mehdi Ali, Michael Fromm, Klaudia Thellmann, Richard Rutmann, Max Lübbering, Johannes Leveling, Katrin Klug, Jan Ebert, Niclas Doll, Jasper Buschhoff, Charvi Jain, Alexander Weber, Lena Jurkschat, Hammam Abdelwahab, Chelsea John, Pedro Ortiz Suarez, Malte Ostendorff, Samuel Weinbach, Rafet Sifa, Stefan Kesselheim, Nicolas Flores-Herr
| Challenge: | Recent success of large language models has been driven by curating the training dataset composition, scaling of model architectures and advancements in pretraining objectives, leaving tokenizer influence as a blind spot. |
| Approach: | They conduct a comprehensive study on the influence of tokenizer choice on LLM downstream performance by training 24 mono- and multilingual LLMs at a 2.6B parameter scale. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can significantly impact the model's downstream performance and training costs. |
Tokenization is Sensitive to Language Variation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Variation in language is often linked to regional, social, and contextual factors. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to estimate tokenizer impact on downstream LLM performance . they pre-train BERT models with the popular Byte-Pair Encoding algorithm . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on Rényi efficiency and other metrics on language variation. |
Information Parity: Measuring and Predicting the Multilingual Capabilities of Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in user-facing applications worldwide, necessitating handling multiple languages across various tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a metric called Information Parity (IP) that can predict an LLM’s capabilities across multiple languages in a task-agnostic manner. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric can predict LLM’s capabilities across multiple languages in a task-agnostic manner. |
Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Historically, studies investigating minority variants of languages have been limited to a select few languages. |
| Approach: | They evaluate state-of-the-art large language models for regional dialects of several high- and low-resource languages and analyze how regional dialect gap is correlated with economic, social, and linguistic factors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with two high-use applications and shows that it can solve the regional dialect gap. |
Tokenization Falling Short: On Subword Robustness in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models typically tokenize raw text into sequences of subword identifiers from a predefined vocabulary. |
| Approach: | They propose to tokenize raw text into sequences of subword identifiers from a predefined vocabulary . they also investigate the challenges and their impact on large language models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can mitigate tokenization issues, but still suffer from typos and other variations. |
EnDive: A Cross-Dialect Benchmark for Fairness and Performance in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks often overlook intra-language variations, leaving speakers of non-standard dialects underserved. |
| Approach: | EnDive evaluates seven state-of-the-art large language models across tasks . human evaluations confirm high translation quality, with average scores of at least 6.02/7 . |
| Outcome: | EnDive evaluates state-of-the-art large language models across language understanding, reasoning, mathematics, logic tasks. |
Where are we Still Split on Tokenization? (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Identifying tokens is a crucial first step for many tasks in Natural Language Processing (NLP) gold tokenization is often assumed, but some work on token-level tasks is more challenging. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient method for tokenization with subword-based language models and evaluate it on 122 languages in 20 scripts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs on par with the state-of-the-art on 122 languages in 20 scripts. |
A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Decoding methods are essential for converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate decoding methods in general-purpose large language models . they find that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods perform task-dependently and are influenced by alignment, model size, and quantization. |