Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic Parsing improves performance of smaller models, but it is unclear whether it extends similarly to large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a prompting approach that embeds semantic hints within the prompt to improve LLM performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves LLMs’ performance across various tasks, highlighting the potential of integrating semantic information to improve LLM capabilities. |
Similar Papers
Do Code Semantics Help? A Comprehensive Study on Execution Trace-Based Information for Code Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Code Large Language Models have limited ability to reason about runtime behavior and understand functionality . authors present a generic framework to support integrating semantic information to code task-relevant prompts . |
| Approach: | a study examines the role of trace-based semantic information in boosting supervised fine-tuning and post-phase inference of Code LLMs. |
| Outcome: | a new framework integrates semantic information to code task-relevant prompts . the proposed framework shows that trace-based semantic information boosts reasoning ability . |
Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhijing Jin, Yuen Chen, Fernando Gonzalez Adauto, Jiarui Liu, Jiayi Zhang, Julian Michael, Bernhard Schölkopf, Mona Diab
| Challenge: | Existing studies show the benefits of semantic representations in NLP tasks . Existing work using AMR is concerned with trainable models . |
| Approach: | They propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method that uses AMR . they propose to use it to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method hurts performance more than it helps on five different tasks. |
Context Dependent Semantic Parsing: A Survey (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing is the task of translating natural language utterances into machine-readable meaning representations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextual information to translate natural language utterances into machine-readable meaning representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods do not utilize contextual information, which could boost the semantic parsing systems. |
Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parsers (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Richard Shin, Christopher Lin, Sam Thomson, Charles Chen, Subhro Roy, Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Dan Klein, Jason Eisner, Benjamin Van Durme
| Challenge: | Large pretrained language models excel at generating natural language, but they are not efficient for task specific semantic parsing. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large pretrained language models as few-shot semantic parsers . they paraphrase inputs into a controlled sublanguage resembling English . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate surprisingly accurate models on multiple tasks with minimal code and data. |
The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that pretraining and instruction-tuned LLMs can achieve impressive performance on a multitude of tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a standard for prompting research to better understand linguistic properties of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed standard would improve the performance of pre-trained and instruction-tuned LLMs on a multitude of tasks. |
Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | specialized LLMs are often limited in domain-specific applications that require specialized knowledge. |
| Approach: | They provide a comprehensive overview of four key methods to enhance large language models by integrating domain-specific knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are categorized into four key approaches: dynamic knowledge injection, static knowledge embedding, modular adapters, and prompt optimization. |
Enhancing Semantic Consistency of Large Language Models through Model Editing: An Interpretability-Oriented Approach (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models generate inconsistent and sometimes contradictory outputs when presented with a prompt that has equivalent semantics but is expressed differently from the original prompt. |
| Approach: | They propose to refine a Large Language Model (LLM) with prompt-output pairs with equivalent semantics to achieve semantic consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the semantic consistency and task performance of LLMs. |
Large Language Models Might Not Care What You Are Saying: Prompt Format Beats Descriptions (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning has improved performance of large language models, but descriptive instructions are still under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose an ensemble prompt framework to describe selection criteria of multiple in-context examples. preliminary experiments on machine translation confirm that this framework boosts ICL performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on commonsense, math, logical reasoning and hallucination tasks with three LLMs. |
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial. |
| Approach: | This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning. |
Traffic Light or Light Traffic? Investigating Phrasal Semantics in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Phrases are fundamental linguistic units through which humans convey semantics. |
| Approach: | They assess the capacity of API-based large language models to comprehend phrase semantics . they use three human-annotated datasets to analyze their results . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms embedding-based methods in phrase semantic reasoning tasks . the proposed model does not show significant advantage over fine-tuned methods . |