Joel Niklaus, Jakob Merane, Luka Nenadic, Sina Ahmadi, Yingqiang Gao, Cyrill A. H. Chevalley, Claude Humbel, Christophe Gösken, Lorenzo Tanzi, Thomas Lüthi, Stefan Palombo, Spencer Poff, Boling Yang, Nan Wu, Matthew Guillod, Robin Mamié, Daniel Brunner, Julio Pereyra, Niko Grupen
| Challenge: | In Switzerland legal translation relies on legal experts who must be both legal experts and skilled translators—creating bottlenecks and impacting effective access to justice. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual benchmarking system that evaluates Swiss legal translation systems based on 180K aligned Swiss legal translator pairs . they show frontier models achieve superior translation performance across all document types while specialized translation systems excel specifically in laws but under-perform in headnotes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms specialized models in laws but underperform in headnotes. |
Similar Papers
Unlocking Legal Knowledge: A Multilingual Dataset for Judicial Summarization in Switzerland (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Luca Rolshoven, Vishvaksenan Rasiah, Srinanda Brügger Bose, Sarah Hostettler, Lara Burkhalter, Matthias Stürmer, Joel Niklaus
| Challenge: | a dataset of 20K rulings from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court is lacking in legal headnotes due to the high cost of manual annotation. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset that contains 20K rulings from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court . they fine-tune open models and compare them to larger general-purpose and reasoning-tunned LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset contains 20K rulings from the Swiss Federal Supreme Court with headnotes in German, French, and Italian. |
PLAWBENCH: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuzhen Shi, Huanghai Liu, Yiran HU, Song Gaojie, Xu Xinran, Yubo Ma, Tianyi Tang, Li Zhang, Qingjing Chen, Feng Di, Wenbo Lv, Weiheng Wu, Kexin Yang, Sen Yang, Wei Wang, Rongyao Shi, Qiu Yuanyang, Yuemeng Qi, Zhang Jingwen, Sui Xiaoyu, Yifan Chen, Zhang Yi, An Yang, Bowen Yu, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Weixing Shen, Bing Zhao, Charles L. A. Clarke, HU Wei
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are coarse, single-dimensional metrics and do not explicitly assess fine-grained legal reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a Practical Law Benchmark to evaluate large language models in real-world legal practice scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on 850 questions and 13 scenarios with expert-designed evaluation rubrics. |
GreekBarBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Free-Text Legal Reasoning and Citations (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | GreekBarBench evaluates LLMs on legal questions across five different legal areas from the Greek Bar exams. |
| Approach: | They propose a three-dimensional scoring system and an LLM-as-a-judge approach to tackle the challenges of free-text evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system uses an LLM-as-a-judge approach to evaluate LLMs on legal questions across five legal areas from the Greek Bar exams. |
Towards Explainability and Fairness in Swiss Judgement Prediction: Benchmarking on a Multilingual Dataset (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using Swiss Judgement Prediction, we evaluate the explainability of state-of-the-art monolingual and multilingual LJP models. |
| Approach: | They propose an occlusion-based approach to evaluate the explainability performance of legal judgement prediction models using Swiss Judgement Prediction, the only available multilingual LJP dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework allows us to quantify the influence of lower court information on model predictions, exposing current models’ biases. |
UCL-Bench: A Chinese User-Centric Legal Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Ruoli Gan, Duanyu Feng, Chen Zhang, Zhihang Lin, Haochen Jia, Hao Wang, Zhenyang Cai, Lei Cui, Qianqian Xie, Jimin Huang, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Existing legal benchmarks focusing on knowledge and logic evaluate LLMs on various tasks in legal domain, but few have explored the practical application of LLM by actual users. |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese user-centric legal benchmark that aims to assess the practical application of LLMs by real users. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on various tasks in legal domain but does not outperfect ChatGPT. |
JurisBench: A Deep Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models in Professional Legal Practice (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ziang Chen, Guannan Li, Fanlin Ji, Yipeng Kang, Jiaqi Li, Muhan Zhang, Yangtao Zhang, Li Tianjiao, Jiannan Wang, Xin Guo, Song-Chun Zhu, Bin Ling
| Challenge: | Existing legal benchmarks evaluate isolated tasks or exam-style questions, failing to capture the procedural interdependencies and adjudicative rigor inherent in professional practice. |
| Approach: | They propose a vertical, depth-oriented, domain-specific benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) in Chinese civil litigation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that large language models exhibit an "illusion of competence" the results highlight a critical gap between fluent linguistic output and judicial reliability . |
LEXTREME: A Multi-Lingual and Multi-Task Benchmark for the Legal Domain (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in legal NLP have led to a rapid growth of the field . however, many benchmarks are available only in English and no multilingual benchmark exists . |
| Approach: | They propose to use 11 datasets covering 24 languages to compare NLP models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that even the best baseline only achieves modest results and ChatGPT struggles with many tasks. |
LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Katz, Nikolaos Aletras
| Challenge: | Laws and their interpretations, legal arguments and agreements are typically expressed in writing. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate model performance across legal NLU tasks . they also evaluate several generic and legal-oriented models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better across multiple tasks than previous models. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
LeCoDe: A Benchmark Dataset for Interactive Legal Consultation Dialogue Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Weikang Yuan, Kaisong Song, Zhuoren Jiang, Junjie Cao, Yujie Zhang, Jun Lin, Kun Kuang, Ji Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu
| Challenge: | Current systems for legal consultation are insufficient to handle the knowledge-intensive nature of real-world consultations. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-turn benchmark dataset to evaluate LLMs in legal consultation settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses LLMs’ consultation capabilities in terms of (1) clarification capability and (2) professional advice quality. |