Speed Up Your Code: Progressive Code Acceleration Through Bidirectional Tree Editing (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Longhui Zhang, Jiahao Wang, Meishan Zhang, GaoXiong Cao, Ensheng Shi, Mayuchi Mayuchi, Jun Yu, Honghai Liu, Jing Li, Min Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing training methods, such as direct instruction fine-tuning, overlook hierarchical relationships among acceleration patterns. |
| Approach: | They propose a new training paradigm that uses bidirectional tree editing and progressive code acceleration learning to improve LLMs’ CA capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed training paradigm outperforms prompt-enhanced GPT-4 and current training-based methods on average across five programming languages. |
Similar Papers
Tree-of-Evolution: Tree-Structured Instruction Evolution for Code Generation in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Data synthesis is a key research area in large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that models code instruction synthesis process with a tree structure and optimization-driven evolution to alleviate constraints of unidirectional synthesis and randomness-driven generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms open-weight code LLMs on five widely-used benchmarks. |
PLD+: Accelerating LLM Inference by Leveraging Language Model Artifacts (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | speculative decoding is a novel decoding paradigm for large language models . however, its use is limited by its computational resources and fine-tuning requirements . |
| Approach: | They propose a tuning-free approach that accelerates inference of large language models . they use draft and verify principle to accelerate inference process . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms tuning-free approaches on input-guided tasks and outperformed state-of-the-art EAGLE on four of the tasks. |
UniSpec: Training-Free Speculative Decoding for Robust LLM Acceleration Across Languages and Hardware (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for speculative decoding ignore device-specific verification costs and lack of mechanisms to assess draft token quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free, lossless speculative decoding framework that enables robust, plug-and-play LLM acceleration across diverse hardware configurations and languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing training-free methods while maintaining identical output quality across different hardware environments. |
CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing code LLMs adopt a specific architecture or rely on a unified encoder-decoder network for downstream tasks, lacking flexibility to operate in the optimal architecture for a particular task. |
| Approach: | They propose to initialize code LLMs with frozen off-the-shelf LLM and explore instruction-tuning to align with natural language instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source LLMs on 20 code-related benchmarks. |
GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLM leaderboards often reference scores reported in other papers without consistent settings and prompts, which may encourage cherry-picking favored settings and for better results. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on top of OpenAI Evals that systematically evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
| Outcome: | The evaluation suite is built on top of OpenAI Evals and evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
PerfCoder: Large Language Models for Interpretable Code Performance Optimization (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiuding Yang, Shengyao Lu, Hongxuan Liu, Shayan Shirahmad Gale Bagi, Zahra Fazel, Tomasz Czajkowski, Di Niu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have advanced automatic code generation, but their ability to produce high-performance code remains limited. |
| Approach: | They propose a family of large language models that generate performance-enhanced code through interpretable and customized optimization strategies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on the PIE code performance benchmark and produces interpretable feedback that can guide larger LLMs in a planner–optimizer workflow. |
CodeArena: Evaluating and Aligning CodeLLMs on Human Preference (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jian Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Wei Zhang, Jin Ke, Yibo Miao, Lei Zhang, Liqun Yang, Zeyu Cui, Yichang Zhang, Zhoujun Li, Binyuan Hui, Junyang Lin
| Challenge: | Code large language models (codeLLMs) focus on synthesizing the correct code snippet, ignoring the alignment with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark code-based on 40 categories and 44 programming languages to emulate real-world coding tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that open-source code LLMs perform better than open-sourced ones. |
TrimLLM: Progressive Layer Dropping for Domain-Specific LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | specialized language models do not show simultaneous memory saving and inference speedup at deployment time. |
| Approach: | They develop a layer-wise specialization technique that reduces the depth of LLMs by progressive layer dropping and compares it to other algorithms for inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model retains LLMs’ capacity in specific domains and achieves inference speedup irrespective of hardware and deep learning frameworks. |
Bridging the Editing Gap in LLMs: FineEdit for Precise and Targeted Text Modifications (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that large language models can perform precise text editing tasks. |
| Approach: | InstrEditBench is a benchmark dataset that compares 30,000 structured editing tasks . experimental evaluations show FineEdit outperforms state-of-the-art models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models on single-turn edits and mistral-7B-OpenOrca on direct edits. |
CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CodeIF assesses the ability of large language models to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark designed to assess LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks across a wide range of complexity levels and programming domains. |