LOTUS: A Leaderboard for Detailed Image Captioning from Quality to Societal Bias and User Preferences (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Yusuke Hirota, Boyi Li, Ryo Hachiuma, Yueh-Hua Wu, Boris Ivanovic, Marco Pavone, Yejin Choi, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Yuta Nakashima, Chao-Han Huck Yang
| Challenge: | Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have transformed image captioning . existing evaluations lack standardized criteria and a standardized evaluation framework . |
| Approach: | They propose a leaderboard for evaluating detailed captions that addresses three main gaps in existing evaluations: lack of standardized criteria, bias-aware assessments, and user preference considerations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates caption quality, descriptiveness, risks, and societal biases while tailoring criteria to user preferences. |
Similar Papers
CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Kanzhi Cheng, Wenpo Song, Jiaxin Fan, Zheng Ma, Qiushi Sun, Fangzhi Xu, Chenyang Yan, Nuo Chen, Jianbing Zhang, Jiajun Chen
| Challenge: | Image captioning has been a challenge for vision-language researchers for decades . current VLMs focus on tasks like visual question answering (YA) but image captioning is not as advanced as expected. |
| Approach: | They evaluate VLMs' performance on image captioning using human annotations . they find that some metrics show high caption-level agreement with humans . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models on image captioning . it achieves 93.4% correlation with human rankings at $4 per test . |
Conceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Practical applications of automatic image description systems include leveraging descriptions for image indexing or retrieval, and helping those with visual impairments by transforming visual signals into information that can be communicated via text-to-speech technology. |
| Approach: | They propose to extract and filter image caption annotations from billions of webpages and use them to train models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model architectures perform better when trained on the Conceptual Captions dataset. |
What Makes for Good Image Captions? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a formal information-theoretic framework is developed for image captioning . the pyramid of captions is a method that generates enriched captions by integrating local and global visual information. |
| Approach: | They propose a formal information-theoretic framework for image captioning . they propose 'Pyramid of Captions' method that generates enriched captions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides a flexible foundation for analyzing and optimizing image captioning systems across diverse task requirements. |
CLAIR: Evaluating Image Captions with Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing measures for image caption evaluation fail to capture dimensions of similarity . a novel method that leverages the zero-shot language modeling capabilities of large language models (LLMs) demonstrates a stronger correlation with human judgments of caption quality compared to existing measures. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages the zero-shot language modeling capabilities of large language models to evaluate captions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows a stronger correlation with human judgments of caption quality compared to other measures. |
Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained evaluation metrics can perpetuate and amplify biases, causing inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations. |
| Approach: | They conduct a systematic study of gender biases in image captioning tasks . they show that pretrained models perpetuate and amplify biase . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model-based evaluation metrics have shown good correlations with human judgments in language generation tasks. |
TIGEr: Text-to-Image Grounding for Image Caption Evaluation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
Ming Jiang, Qiuyuan Huang, Lei Zhang, Xin Wang, Pengchuan Zhang, Zhe Gan, Jana Diesner, Jianfeng Gao
| Challenge: | Existing metrics based on text-level comparisons fail to assess the quality of captions produced by machines. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a machine-learned text-image grounding model to measure the accuracy of machine-generated captions and their correlation with human judgments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric has higher consistency with human judgments and is more accurate than existing metrics. |
Enhancing Large Vision-Language Models with Ultra-Detailed Image Caption Generation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing pipelines for generating high-quality, ultra-detailed image captions are limited by the scarcity of image caption data. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline for generating high-quality, ultra-detailed image captions that integrates both pre-processing and post-processor stages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline improves LVLMs' perception and cognitive abilities across multiple vision-language benchmarks. |
A Unified Framework and Dataset for Assessing Societal Bias in Vision-Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have highlighted the existence of social biases within large vision and language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for systematically evaluating gender, race, and age biases in vision-language models with respect to professions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework covers all supported inference modes of the recent vision-language models, including image-to-text, text-to image, and image- to-image. |
IRR: Image Review Ranking Framework for Evaluating Vision-Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Kazuki Hayashi, Kazuma Onishi, Toma Suzuki, Yusuke Ide, Seiji Gobara, Shigeki Saito, Yusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Taro Watanabe
| Challenge: | Large-scale vision language models excel at generating factual content, but their ability to rank images from multiple perspectives has not been explored. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate large-scale vision-language models by measuring their ability to rank image texts from multiple perspectives. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework measures how closely LVLMs' judgments align with human interpretations. |
Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioning (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jungo Kasai, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Lavinia Dunagan, Jacob Morrison, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin Choi, Noah A. Smith
| Challenge: | Recent work has demonstrated that image captioning is a complex task that requires a large amount of human input. |
| Approach: | They develop a human evaluation protocol for image captioning models based on machine- and human-generated captions on the MSCOCO dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves CLIPScore, a recent metric that uses image features, and improves human judgments because it is more sensitive to recall. |